Undercover Reporter Infiltrates Security Firm to Expose London Olympics

Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
This is some serious stuff. Although the journalist in question has very little references on the internet which is slightly suspicious. I definitely won't be going to the Olympics.

The source is from a weekly political editorial broadcast from a community radio station.

As individual burden of proof standards vary tremendously on ATS, I say draw your own conclusions.

Friday Drivetime/BCfm’s weekly politics show presented by Tony Gosling

At five: discussing the big stories in Bristol, Britain and around the world
After six: straight talking and investigative reports with Martin Summers & Marina Morris

For all the shows back to Easter 2009 visit the Friday Drivetime archive page.

First hour: Prime Minister David Cameron’s father Ian pioneered the abuse of Tax Havens and the Cameron family fortune was accumulated in Panama, Geneva and Jersey. News review with St. George East Labour Councillor Fabian Breckles.

Second hour: The 2012 London olympics start in 4 weeks time. Exclusive interview with investigative journalist Lee Hazledean who is training undercover as a security guard for the London olympics with private security firm G4S. Lee is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist. He has also been involved in major stories on the IRA and how British Army infiltrated the organisation and carried out false flag operations. He has managed to get undercover as part of the security team at the 2012 Olympics with G4S.....

BCfm 93.2fm
BCfm is the first community radio station in Bristol. Offering access to air time, direct community involvement, training and the desired community led output of the audience. BCfm gives the city of Bristol the choice and the voice to get involved and make a difference.

BCfm started broadcasting on March 26th 2007 to the city of Bristol. This was the culmination of many years of community development and radio projects in Bristol by Phil Gibbons and Joanne Schofield, such as radio19 (the New Deal for Communities), Commonwealth fm and B200fm (Celebration of Brunel’s life).


BCfm is a limited company and charity. Company number 5377534 and charity number 1123827

Anybody can be involved with BCfm and on an average week you will hear about 45 different programmes being broadcast by many different types of people who represent an area, age, religion, agency or just themselves! We broadcast in about nine different languages and aim to represent the WHOLE of Bristol and Bristol life. Local music is a big part of what we do as well.

reply to post by Drunkenparrot


Hmmm, thanks for that. I hate to be a cynic, but I'm calling BS on this one. I wouldn't be that surprised if it was true though.

Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
reply to post by Dnevnoi

 

I'm starting to doubt how genuine this journalist is too. Google has almost no info on him before this interview.

Ugh, don't even call him a journalist. Even RussiaToday and Xinhua journo's have more credibility than this "Lee Hazledean" and the fact that he ceased to exist before today only shows that he's using a pen name, which makes him lose credibility even more. The fact that he claims of a "media blackout" is laughable at best, since apparently only UK newspapers would be the only ones to take the story and not a global, multi-language news network such as, oh I don't know, Al-Jazeera?

Unfortunately this will turn into a "Gay Girl in Damascus" rallying point for those of a similar belief on this forum.

Looking at DrunkenParrot's post, let me add that "citizen journalism" through a "community radio station" is almost always bull#. There is no gatekeeping in that situation. Which means that alleged filmmakers and wannabe investigative journalists can put out their ideas and notions in a way that many seem to believe as fact. Even the most raw of citizen journalist sites have editors who keep watch for the absolutely, jaw-droppingly ridiculous stories.This little radio station clearly doesn't have an editor, which is a shame for their "credibility."

Everytime there's a NATO gathering, or some big gathering, these types of stories always "leak" out, but nothing happens.

And nothing will happen this time either. If it was your city, would you not see to it all of the measures are taken for safety? Of course you would.

Ya know, they don't just hire the local safety and regulations teens group for the security, right? Trust me, the people who are hired for security are trustworthy in events like this magnitude. For security measures of this magnitude, they don't hire new security firms, but firms who have a dependable track record. And they don't just do background checks on their new team members. Their checks are so extensive you wouldn't believe it if I went into details.

In short, this is just another dumping of waste material into an already polluted river by your typical fear factory. Not gonna happen.

One thing I have to mention, do you think a massive disaster could help the economy? 

Maybe this is planned? 

I'm in a town just outside London, I won't lie but the Olympics scares me, the fact I'm within 40ish miles away from the centre on London!

I have my bug out bag and safe house up north ready!

Anyone tried to research Lee Hazledean? Nothings come up, for an investigative journo that's strange, he would have had other work published. In fact, the only thing that is showing is this video and story.

Calling BS on this one.

Hi nice video it's very well informative, I just want to say that I live in London, NW in fact and I've been down to E last week and I've seen some troops and security around tower blocks where missiles are set up.

I myself live in a 16 story tower block.

Also wanted to say I left college in Christmas time and I have this friend who also just left college in Christmas who just got a job with G4S, his English speaking skills are fair.

I plan on leaving London in a few weeks because of the Olympics since I have a holiday home somewhere in the north of England.

Originally posted by ironsjack
Anyone tried to research Lee Hazledean? Nothings come up, for an investigative journo that's strange, he would have had other work published. In fact, the only thing that is showing is this video and story.

Calling BS on this one.

edit on 24-6-2012 by ironsjack because: (no reason given)

My point exactly. And if this is an alias, why come out now? Surely wait till he has more evidence. By his voice alone I'm sure G4S could nab him if it is a fake name.

And as for media blackout, take it from me that The Guardian would definitely take this story if he had sufficient proof.

Well I am surprised some people are worried enough to leave London ? I didnt think the missiles would go down very well either , i'd back the decisions up with that first . Its unprecedented , and amazing , really incredible that people are expected to live under them .

I mean , how much pressure can people take? Personally am undecided about it . The worst threat is the state extremists , by a long way , it seems . Thats the ones assembling weaponry on residential byuldings

LOL @ 4:20 of OP's video journalist is mistaken he is so naiv OMG. He decribed his training with metal detectors that every 50th user would beep meaning that the user has metal on him. He concluded that it means terrorists with metal (e.g. ammunition) would easily go through because metal detectors beep at every 50th user. LOL it was a training simulation, not a real thing. In reality metal detectors beep whenever they detect metal.

Isn't the British government using G4S for Private police work. Why would they ruin such a deal by exposing their weak points?

reply to post by Fichorka

not if its rigged
he then goes on to say he was a mock terrorist and carried a gun ect through,if you understand what he is saying it is set to bleep so it looks like its working when infact its not so there isnt a buildup of ques a,vlisual deterant
it sounds like they are putting a security show on not actual security and hope for the best

reply to post by DeyTookErJeobs


that could be why there is a media blackout we no the media and gov are in bed together.and it would be equily if not even more embaresing admiting that they have fuged up.this is the same company that used to lose prisoners they were escorting.

maybe g4s are the thugs of the future , like a private army . then it would be best to make sure the name of it and the whole deal stinks , completely stinks .
a company you really cant rely on to be safe , at all , even if you work for them . that kind of atmosphere that just about no one can take , there are those exactly like that have been murdering people in Yemen , hired thugs .
like standing on quicksand, anywhere near them .
fear , actualised fear , now it is a deterrent

reply to post by Scope and a Beam


before people jump into the loop of no proof of person = the story is completly bullcrap , please take a second to concider one thing... HE IS STILL UNDERCOVER and in that case why would he give his real name to the guy interviewing him if it would just lead to him being found out ... he makes a point of hiding who he is at the start of the interview when talking about his past work.... im not saying its true, but dont jump the gun... if he is an undercover whistleblower he deffinitely wont be using his real name at the moment, that would be beyond stupid!

i would also think that if he though he might get into some serious triuble, i.e disapear ... it might be a good idea to let the fact out someone is on the inside snooping, i would imagine before getting into somethign like this alot of redundencies woudl need to be in place incase the worst did happen.

Originally posted by boaby_phet
reply to post by Scope and a Beam

 

before people jump into the loop of no proof of person = the story is completly bullcrap , please take a second to concider one thing... HE IS STILL UNDERCOVER and in that case why would he give his real name to the guy interviewing him if it would just lead to him being found out ... he makes a point of hiding who he is at the start of the interview when talking about his past work.... im not saying its true, but dont jump the gun... if he is an undercover whistleblower he deffinitely wont be using his real name at the moment, that would be beyond stupid!

exactly! of course he's going to use a pen name right now, he's probably worried about his safety.

Every 4 years, we get this. Remember "8-8-8" - and all the ridiculous false flag / terror attack theories that circulated? All the supposed insiders, leaks and so on. Every Olympics is a false flag event waiting to happen. A disaster in the planning. Every Olympics, they go off without a hitch, no attacks, no bombs, nada.

Pardon me if I don't hold my breath due to some unknown "investigative journalist" spilling the beans on this new disaster in the making.

Explanation: S&F!

From the OP ...

Exclusive interview with investigative journalist Lee Hazledean who is training undercover as a security guard for the London olympics with private security firm G4S. Lee is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist. He has also been involved in major stories on the IRA and how British Army infiltrated the organisation and carried out false flag operations. He has managed to get undercover as part of the security team at the 2012 Olympics with G4S. He has found there is a media black out on all major news outlets to do with the Olympics unless the story is broken in a news paper or foreign news agency it's unlikely to see the light of day. Security training and officers are so appaling that the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics are in jeopardy.

Note ... All edits to bold and underline are mine for emphasis.

This may be related ...

Did the Murdoch Media Group Scandal Sink the UK 2012 Olympic Security Hopes as Two Top Cops Resign? (by OmegaLogos posted on 26-7-2011 @ 01:41 AM) [ATS]

Personal Disclosure:

There's more security going on than just G4S.
13,000 Soldiers To Provide Security
Metro Police and Royal Marines Perform Security Operations
Defensive Missiles Around Olympic Games

However, I definitely don't trust the British government after the Princess Diana fiasco or 7/7 bombings. Imagine them carrying out a false flag operation at the Olympics. It'll be far more impacting than 9/11 because hundreds of millions will be tuned in to see it and it's an event cherished globally. Their government will have permission to do anything they desire in the name of "anti-terrorism" and England will turn into George Orwell's Nineteen Eight-Four overnight. It's already been happening to the US for 10+ years.

Psychopaths run this world. Don't doubt it. Stay away from the Olympics is my advice.

Let's not forget what the Olympic Committee said regarding London winning the privilege to host the Olympics.

"London scored poorly in the "Transport concept" and "Government support, legal issues and public opinion" categories, but received a 10 in the "Accommodation" category."

I don't know about you, but "accommodation" is the least important on my criteria list.
Sounds like a setup.