Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

A simple question....If 911 was a conspiracy...

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 10:55 PM
link   
..then why didn't the Bush administration plant WMD in the Iraqi desert?

This is much easier, and more logistically feasible than having 4 hijacked planes, etc. etc.

If they can pull that off, why not just plant weapons?




posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by elitelogic
 


They did in the WTC towers. You think the plane hijackers were able to do that all in one night? It would of taken weeks to rig those building to fall at such fast speed.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:00 PM
link   
because they would have found them and taken them away = no problem



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:02 PM
link   
Because part of the thrill of evil is making people believe in lies!



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:05 PM
link   
all replies so far completely ignore the politics involved.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by elitelogic
 


The people at the top know that politics are fake and just a smokescreen to blind the masses. Presidents serve the CFR.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
..then why didn't the Bush administration plant WMD in the Iraqi desert?

This is much easier, and more logistically feasible than having 4 hijacked planes, etc. etc.

If they can pull that off, why not just plant weapons?


But knowing what we know now, they didn't have to!
It was all about American patriotic fervor. The war in Iraq was simply to add a Rothschild bank where there once was not. They did it and it doesn't matter at all if they found them or not, knowing what has transpired.

You attempt to tie in Iraq with 911 and to me there never was or is a tie to any terrorists from Iraq. I thought they were Saudi's and Israeli's. Did I miss something in your op?

I think you are using faulty logic and are building a strawman and not a logical case in point.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:37 PM
link   
reply to post by elitelogic
 


Planting WMD's in the deserts of Iraq would have done what? That by itself would not have brought a nation together to fight a enemy that "allegedly" attacked us on our soil. The lie was sold, we bought it and we are now busy 'nation building" all over the globe.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 11:39 PM
link   
Ummm because he didn't need to? 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq and the fact that they got the retard masses to even go along with invading Iraq was good enough.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
..then why didn't the Bush administration plant WMD in the Iraqi desert?

This is much easier, and more logistically feasible than having 4 hijacked planes, etc. etc.

If they can pull that off, why not just plant weapons?


Man, how quickly you people forget. Why bother planting weapons? Wouldn't it be even easier to forge documents?
Niger uranium forgeries

In other words, someone, we don't know who, did exactly that.
edit on 24-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 02:28 AM
link   
I don't know, why do people keep trying to debunk the 9/11 conspiracy? Doesn't matter what evidence, logic, sources, stories ect ect. It won't change anyones opinion. Same goes for truthers when talking to debunker's.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 03:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
..then why didn't the Bush administration plant WMD in the Iraqi desert?

This is much easier, and more logistically feasible than having 4 hijacked planes, etc. etc.

If they can pull that off, why not just plant weapons?


Saddam Hussein and Iraq had nothing to do with 911, Bush admitted that. He got legal approval from Congress and the UN for the war in Iraq claiming Saddam had WMD's and was an evil dictator.

He needed a war(war on terrorism) with undefined enemies that could on for as long as wanted. Planting WMD's in Iraq wouldn't have accomplished that. Wether Saddam Hussein actually had WMD's once the war was started was irrelevant.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 03:31 AM
link   
Why don't Al Queda (spelling) do a similar suicide mission if they were the instigators? Why is everything before or after 9/11 so small in scale to what happened on that fateful day?

Who bombed the building in Oklahoma, was it Al Queda?

It does not look like this terrorist organization can pull off big terrorist attacks.

edit on 24-6-2012 by Atlantien because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
..then why didn't the Bush administration plant WMD in the Iraqi desert?

This is much easier, and more logistically feasible than having 4 hijacked planes, etc. etc.

If they can pull that off, why not just plant weapons?


Because finding WMDs in the desert would not have had the impact on the public consciousness as aeroplanes crashing into buildings would have. Also, they would not have been able to use phrases such as "America is under attack' to put the fighteners on the masses..

Perhaps you might like to consider the possibility that 911 was an inside job because it was all too perfect.

full and complete video capture of planes hitting buildings and bursting into flames,photopgrahers got 'perfect shots not only partial capture like the Penatgon car park camera did.
photgraphers in the perfect spot to capture perfect video of horror and terror
video of planes hitting buildings with women screaming in the backgrorud etc.

Don't you think the whole thing was a just a little too perfect to be a supprise attack by a group exteremists?



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:18 AM
link   
The point was to get into Iraq and Afghanistan via public paranoia and fervor.

Succeeded.

What was the point of planting WMD's or not, if by extension, no one did a damn thing to stopping the invasions even after they admitted to finding nothing? Or how no criminal charges were filed? It hasn't even stopped people from future incursions into Libya e.g., or people talking about Syria. Even though the lie about "Iraqi Freedom" was well known.

The point being, they don't need to "plant weapons of mass destruction" to further their goals, do they.

Or how about another conspiracy, maybe they wanted to hold a "WMD Wild Card" to say that the Weapons were transported to Iran, or anywhere else.. so they could use that propaganda to convince the public we needed an invasion of either country. Ultimately deciding not to, and holding off further incursions at a future date... as is happening now...
edit on 24-6-2012 by SyphonX because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:04 AM
link   
The acting group who did 9/11, was disassembled the same day. At the VMD time about a year later, all what was left was the lies. I think that is the way to make this sort of operation to stick.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:06 AM
link   
I believe your answer would be...

Because 9/11 was meant to sling the nation into a panic so that we would fervently agree with anything that they said, blinded by anger. So we hear there's some WMD over there, eh, no surprise. An attack on AMERICAN SOIL!?!?!?! Unheard of. Just the thing to make the Country so insane that they could get away with anything. Getting to attach this to whomever they pleased was just the cherry on top.





new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join