Ok... so, to try and keep this cut and dry, black and white...
1. War on Drugs
2. Cartels committing acts of terror.
Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion. In the international community, however, terrorism has no universally
agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition. Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create
fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological goal; and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants
Coercion (play /koʊˈɜrʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by
use of threats or intimidation or some other form of pressure or force. In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as
leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way.
These 'Cartels' are notorious for
3.War on Terrorism
The United States, and the World are currently in a war against Terrorism... It would appear appropriate(in my opinion) to label these Cartels as
such. The means and characteristics of these groups echoes or reiterates just about every defining characteristic of what a terrorist is.
So far, we have identified two wars, culprits, and characteristics...
4. 2nd Amendment (right to bear arms)
The main focus of the 2nd Amendment can be summed up as the right for citizens to protect themselves from a tyrannical government.
Obama is not a fan of the Constitution, he holds very little ideological stances that parallel the foundation of the US. Many would make claim that
he and the US government are dangerously close to fitting the description of a Tyrants.
1. A government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.
Could claim that Obama's use of the Executive Privilege, actions taken in Syria and a whole list of other actions taken by Obama reflect a
To wrap this up...
Is it not possible that Eric Holder and gang could be guilty of treason?
Consider that we are in two wars... one against drugs, and one against terrorism, well that's exactly what these Cartels are all about!
Some have suggested that the 'end game' of such activities was to incite further violence by these Cartels. In hopes that they would use these
assault rifles, and the news of such would be used to take shots at the 2nd Amendment! The very same Amendment that is necessary for the US citizens
to protect themselves from the very same type of actions the current Administration is partaking in!
There's much more to be said about this, but I'd rather not rant on about it... if there is anybody willing to take on this topic and discuss it
further I would be happy to!
You can't provide arms to the enemy, especially one that is known for corrupting governments, committing acts of terror... in aims of destroying or
dissolving Amendments of the Constitution that are there to protect ourselves from a Government that is progressively becoming a safe house for a
For more on this topic... check out:
What 'conspiracy' lies behind Eric Holder and 'Fast and Furious'?
from linked thread:
Along with conservative commentators like Rush Limbaugh, Issa suggested as late as April that Fast and Furious may have been part of a policy by the
White House to flood the Mexican market with guns to foment violence, which would then put political pressure back on the US to curb its wide-open
border gun bazaar and weaken Second Amendment rights.