Genetically modified grass (not) blamed for mass cattle deaths in Texas, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 87 times


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 09:21 PM by snarky412
reply to post by Char-Lee




Personally I think this alone is enough for a doom thread that should scar anyone to death! I doubt we will survive the scientists creativity!



That's the problem.....

The scientists need to ask themselves instead of COULD they do this, they need to ask SHOULD we do this.

NO, you SHOULD not.....

Mess with Mother Nature and she will get even.

Paybacks' a bitch and we ain't seen nothing yet!!


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 09:26 PM by moonweed
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to
post by Char-Lee




Personally I think this alone is enough for a doom thread that should scar anyone to death! I doubt we will survive the scientists creativity!



That's the problem.....

The scientists need to ask themselves instead of COULD they do this, they need to ask SHOULD we do this.

NO, you SHOULD not.....

Mess with Mother Nature and she will get even.

Paybacks' a bitch and we ain't seen nothing yet!!



we haven't seen anything, yet...especially if anyone messes with mother nature.....there will be hell to pay


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 10:00 PM by moonweed
reply to post by snarky412



should we be surprised that even grass is being GMO'd? being tainted, and we don't even know it????


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 10:08 PM by snarky412
reply to post by moonweed



My other thought is this....

Depending on where and who is using that specific type of grass, what about the wild life around that area. Not sure where in Texas this is but parts of Texas is deer country. Hence, a lot of deer hunters who eat deer meat. Also rabbits, squirrels, etc...

Basically, how much of Mother Nature will be affected by wash offs, when it does rain, and other animals roaming around.

Hopefully it's just a limited area, hopefully.....


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 10:10 PM by stanguilles7
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to
post by moonweed



My other thought is this....

Depending on where and who is using that specific type of grass, what about the wild life around that area. Not sure where in Texas this is but parts of Texas is deer country. Hence, a lot of deer hunters who eat deer meat. Also rabbits, squirrels, etc...


Well, it apparently killed the cattle in a matter of hours. So i doubt any hunters will be eating any dead deer they find laying about.

Basically, how much of Mother Nature will be affected by wash offs, when it does rain, and other animals roaming around.

Hopefully it's just a limited area, hopefully.....


The cyanide appears to be in the grass, and kills the cattle when they ingest it. So there wont be any 'runoff'.


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 10:25 PM by snarky412
reply to post by stanguilles7



I was speaking more hypothetically......

I know it wouldn't kill the deer, I was just merely thinking about them ingesting the grass and it being in their system if they feed around the same area all the time.

And being as this is still new and being observed, only in time can we or rather "they" say whether or not it's safe and won't harm any wild life. Or us for that fact.

It takes years for research to be done on any thing, such as pharmaceutical drugs, like about 15 years for the side affects to be known. The pro's and con's if you will about a drug. So in my mind, I'm thinking the same about this stuff. Only time will tell.


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 10:30 PM by stanguilles7
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to
post by stanguilles7



I was speaking more hypothetically......

I know it wouldn't kill the deer, I was just merely thinking about them ingesting the grass and it being in their system if they feed around the same area all the time.


But if they ingested it, it likely would kill them. So there is little reason to believe there is toxic, cyanide-laden deer running around Texas. At least, at this point.

And being as this is still new and being observed, only in time can we or rather "they" say whether or not it's safe and won't harm any wild life. Or us for that fact.


Actually, as several have already pointed out in this thread, it isnt actually 'new'. Different grasses have been known to create cyanide that can be dangerous to livestock for many years. The only difference in this case, is this specific type of grass wasnt apparently previously known to produce cyanide.


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 11:30 PM by snarky412
reply to post by moonweed



Yeah ..... it used to be for the People.....

Now it's screw the People......

TPTB only cares about lining their pockets now.... they'll worry about the consequences later.


reply posted on 23-6-2012 @ 11:38 PM by moonweed
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to
post by moonweed



Yeah ..... it used to be for the People.....

Now it's screw the People......

TPTB only cares about lining their pockets now.... they'll worry about the consequences later.



damn shame politicians, and others think that way...."america the beautiful" is now "america the greedy"
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags