It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
APTI is owned by BAE, not Raytheon.
Advanced Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI), an employee-owned company, was awarded the contract to design and build the IRI, based on a proposal submitted in response to an RFP issued by the Office of Naval Research in 1992, and published in the Commerce Business Daily.
APTI was owned by Raytheon...
...up until earlier this year, when it was purchased by BAE Systems.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
does't explain the sprayer patents
did he test the rainwater for aluminum ?
he's a skeptic who makes his living telling the weather
and I think a reason for chemtrails is to slow down global warming so the big boys can still sell oil, so the fact he's a sketic on global warming but doesn't see the connection is telling to meedit on 23-6-2012 by syrinx high priest because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
you prove to me there is no chemicals in a contrail.
No. You prove to me there ARE. That's how it works here in reality.
Ok meet you at the hanger,
you start the engines close the doors and I will call 911 for you.edit on 23-6-2012 by Gmoneycricket because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Having a high ranking official side with you on any topic to release to the public is usually a sign that person was a paid representative.
It is probable that he believes his story, but without testing the exhaust from the planes how could he know?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Chadwickus
HAARP was built by BAE Advanced Technologies, not Raytheon...
H.A.A.R.P.
Advanced Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI), a subsidiary of E-Systems, Inc., which is owned by Raytheon Corporation, designed and built HAARP.
picky....
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Having a high ranking official side with you on any topic to release to the public is usually a sign that person was a paid representative.
So, your argument is that if the story is supported by people who knw what they are talking about, it cant be true?
It is probable that he believes his story, but without testing the exhaust from the planes how could he know?
No lack of testing the exhaust seems to prevent the chemtrail believers from holding firm to their beliefs.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Uncinus
E.L.Rothschild LLC Acquires a Majority Stake in Weather Central, LP
70% stake back in 2011 the article says. The article surrounding that article also says that they get their weather from Raytheon, the HAARP builder. Get real. Stop promoting propoganda.
So how is it propaganda if he's simply saying what every single meteorologist in the entire world says about "chemtrails"?
Have you asked any meteorologist? Go ahead, find one (with a degree in meteorology, so not Scott Stevens), and ask them. They will say the same thing.
So how is it propaganda if he's simply saying what every single meteorologist in the entire world says about "chemtrails"?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Uncinus
So how is it propaganda if he's simply saying what every single meteorologist in the entire world says about "chemtrails"?
o.m.g. Uncinus! I'm going to pretend you didn't make a statement involving absolutes because you're smarter than that. Further, you're not asking meteorologists these questions of yours; you're asking the house of Rothschild.
Do I want the house of Rothschild telling me that there are no chemtrails? Seriously?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a Rothschild buys a weather forecasting company, and that proves chemtrails exist?
How does that work exactly??
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a Rothschild buys a weather forecasting company, and that proves chemtrails exist?
How does that work exactly??
Yeah, I'll keep it on the front page. Is there some kind of a ban on replying to me directly? Too much 'K' whatever that is?
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
Explaining would be preferable - how do you jump from predicting the weather to directing it?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
Originally posted by coven83
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
"Simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails"
No problem. Go to the paragraph labled 1). Its even a NOAA meteorologist.
worldaffairsbrief.com...
Anything else?
According to NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter, quoted in the article, “At temperatures lower than approx -40 deg F contrails almost always form, regardless of relative humidity. The higher the ambient temperature, the less likely that contrails will form. At temperatures above -40 degrees F, contrails are not expected. The persistence of contrails depends upon temperature, relative humidity, and the vigor of mixing between the exhaust plume and the ambient air. At low temperatures, with high humidity, and with stable temperature stratification (which inhibits vertical mixing of the air), contrails persist for many hours."
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by coven83
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
"Simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails"
No problem. Go to the paragraph labled 1). Its even a NOAA meteorologist.
worldaffairsbrief.com...
Anything else?
Really? A NOAA meteorogist is quoted like this:
According to NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter, quoted in the article, “At temperatures lower than approx -40 deg F contrails almost always form, regardless of relative humidity. The higher the ambient temperature, the less likely that contrails will form. At temperatures above -40 degrees F, contrails are not expected. The persistence of contrails depends upon temperature, relative humidity, and the vigor of mixing between the exhaust plume and the ambient air. At low temperatures, with high humidity, and with stable temperature stratification (which inhibits vertical mixing of the air), contrails persist for many hours."
So where exactly does he thing chemtrails are real?
Originally posted by coven83
you conveniently left out the first line of the paragraph. Okay maybe u just missed it. Ill put it in parenthesis for you.
" Chemtrails often occur at altitudes and in environmental conditions where normal contrails cannot and do not occur" . There you go now when he goes on to explain how contrails cannot form at the same levels you should better understand.