Fake Blue Sky

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Absolute nonsense - everyone knows that chemtrails make skies bluer - Rense says it is so, so it must be true.

Can't you chemmies even talk to each other about which fantasy to push??!!




posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 




Not true, cloud seeding has been proven to work and has been employed recently in China to clear the smoggy air for the Olympics in Beijing.


Maybe you don't now what a scientific study is. Maybe you don't understand that the earth is a closed eco-system with only so much water in the hydrological cycle. Maybe you didn't read my earlier post on the government agencies that say that cloud seeding, rainmaking, royal rainmaking has never been proven to work.

Maybe you don't know that cloud seeding, as it's practiced today, involves cutting edge technology with remote detonation and strange structures in remote areas as well as drive-by initiation.

Maybe you don't know these things and how could you? They're not reported in the media. Maybe you don't know that the technology exists to move a cloud, for instance a radioactive cloud, from one location to another.

Maybe you don't know but that's not going to help.

Do I think the technology exists to produce a gentle rain? Yes I do. Is the technology being used that way? No it isn't. If government agencies admitted this, they would then be obliged to produce it. What do you think that would do to the weather commodities insider trading scam? Follow the money. Live in greed at the expense of your fellow man. Engage in plausible deniability.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by luxordelphi
 


There's a lot of things that I don't know. Maybe you didn't look at my links about Project Popeye and the Weather Warfare Treaty. Banning the tech just means it is used covertly.


The Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD), formally the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques is an international treaty prohibiting the military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. It opened for signature on 18 May 1977 in Geneva and entered into force on 5 October 1978. The Convention bans weather warfare, which is the use of weather modification techniques for the purposes of inducing damage or destruction. The Convention on Biological Diversity of 2010 would also ban some forms of weather modification or geoengineering.[2]



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


Come out of your Sunday to deal with fake blue skies, have you? I want to know what all the gold and silver and drones are for (not to take anything away from rense but just saying.) Make sense? I want to know why the federal government is protecting nano. There's just something about the sky....



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Mirrors are needed to create sophisticated holograms.

The ocean would be a perfect mirror.

Anyone ever see the Truman Show? Fake sun, moon, ocean, everything. All controlled under a top secret dome, while the world lives on outside.

There could be millions of these domes, all while us selfish humans think we live alone. The only thought of "outsiders" comes in the form of scary aliens and ufo's. Fear based.

The sky could very well be fake, but the open mind is a very rare thing around here.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 05:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


Come out of your Sunday to deal with fake blue skies, have you?


no - it is Monday here - i'm way ahead of you!!



I want to know what all the gold and silver and drones are for


So why not just ask that question instead of dressing it up with a whole heap of chemtrail fantasy?


Gold and silver aer used for many many industial processes - lots of people think colloidal silver is a cure-all. some think similar things about gold.

All you ahve done is say "it's hazy here today and these people make silver nanaoparticles therefore chemtrails" - you are not even wrong


(not to take anything away from rense but just saying.) Make sense?


no - according to you the sky is getting less blue. According to Rense it is getting more blue - so you ARE taking somethign aay from Rense - you say he's wrong.


I want to know why the federal government is protecting nano.


I want to know what that even means!!



There's just something about the sky....


Yeah - moisture - millions or billions of tons of it.

And air.
edit on 24-6-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
edit on 24-6-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 05:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


You're off your game, sport, chalk it up to Monday blues then and rest easy.

Maybe I've just got silver on the brain (nano size particles of silver can actually penetrate the blood brain barrier and silver is a heavy metal which can wreak havoc physically and psychologically with a person.)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 




Maybe you didn't look at my links about Project Popeye and the Weather Warfare Treaty. Banning the tech just means it is used covertly.


Why are you the second person to seemingly de-cloak in this thread? What's up? Have I entered cryptic-heaven or have I just stumbled upon some subject that was previously explained to you i.e. why it's necessary to decieve the public?



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 05:51 PM
link   
reply to post by luxordelphi
 


Seems to me that you "chemmies" want the monopoly here!

When we get clouds.......it's the Chemtrails!


When we get blue skies.....it's the nano particles!


Sad really, that you have convinced yourself that there is a conspiracy whatever the weather is doing!

Just go outside and enjoy it!.....it's just weather!



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by windword
 




Maybe you didn't look at my links about Project Popeye and the Weather Warfare Treaty. Banning the tech just means it is used covertly.


Why are you the second person to seemingly de-cloak in this thread? What's up? Have I entered cryptic-heaven or have I just stumbled upon some subject that was previously explained to you i.e. why it's necessary to decieve the public?


HAHA! This is why:


"if the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts." George H.W. Bush


De-cloak? Not sure what you mean.

I find the idea of a "fake sky" a bit far fetched. Are they messing with chemicals and polluting the atmosphere? Yes most probably.

But a better question is, what is all this? Looks like an invasion to me!

edit on 24-6-2012 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:33 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 





But a better question is, what is all this? Looks like an invasion to me!



You know that is a fake picture don't you?....................don't you?



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Argyll
 


I don't know. I've seen many of these pictures in the news, Huffington Post, Yahoo, here on ATS. I just went looking for one, and Googled "space junk pictures" and grabbed this one.

Here's another one. www.huffingtonpost.com...

And here's a link with a video from The European Space Agency.

www.esa.int...



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


You're off your game, sport, chalk it up to Monday blues then and rest easy.

Maybe I've just got silver on the brain (nano size particles of silver can actually penetrate the blood brain barrier and silver is a heavy metal which can wreak havoc physically and psychologically with a person.)


did you mean to make a meaningful comment??



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Argyll
 


I don't know. I've seen many of these pictures in the news, Huffington Post, Yahoo, here on ATS. I just went looking for one, and Googled "space junk pictures" and grabbed this one.

Here's another one. www.huffingtonpost.com...

And here's a link with a video from The European Space Agency.

www.esa.int...


From your HuffPo link:

The following graphics are computer generated images of objects in Earth orbit that are currently being tracked. Approximately 95% of the objects in this illustration are orbital debris, i.e., not functional satellites. The dots represent the current location of each item. The orbital debris dots are scaled according to the image size of the graphic to optimize their visibility and are not scaled to Earth.


i.e. it shows WHERE they are, not HOW BIG they are.



posted on Jun, 24 2012 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


Thanks.


The ESA link has a color coded legend that breaks it down into different sizes and categories.



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 01:45 AM
link   
reply to post by windword
 




I find the idea of a "fake sky" a bit far fetched.


This is a fair statement. Perhaps my OP was too nebulous and failed to connect dots. 10 years ago the federal government began funding nano technology. Nano technology is the science of making things very small and of making them stay that small. When a substance, like silver, is made this small, it no longer necessarily behaves like larger silver particles. In fact different nano sizes of the same substance can even be very different from each other.

Because of these substances and their properties and behavior or lack of behavior it is possible to create a fake sky. Continuous delivery systems for an ongoing fake sky are also available and already in place - I mentioned one - cloud seeding. Another one is persistent contrails on a level never seen before. Most jet cirrus winds up being too high and too thin to see and categorize with the eye as cirrus. It still does retain obscurant properties. So coupled with what we can see, which is considerable, it all winds up giving us a view of no view. And more pointedly a view of a sky but perhaps not our sky.

Because the technology exists to make rain (though I personally question the wisdom of 'creating' rain in a closed eco-system) and move clouds and clear skies and because the technology exists to eliminate jet cirrus, the question of why arises.

Because the safety of nano size particles is suspect and questionable (i.e. depleted uranium dirty bombs and asbestos) and because no safeguards for it's use are in place the wisdom of massively spitting out these particles has to be looked at.

Liked the quote you put up so here's another:

WikiProtest .com


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” -J. Edgar Hoover, ex-FBI director on the New World Order conspiracy



posted on Jun, 25 2012 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by luxordelphi
Liked the quote you put up so here's another:

WikiProtest .com


“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” -J. Edgar Hoover, ex-FBI director on the New World Order conspiracy


That's actually Hoover talking about the Soviet Communists.

metabunk.org...(Hoover)



posted on Jul, 28 2012 @ 05:33 PM
link   
They don't want you to realize that there's a blue planet shaped like Al Gore's head.





top topics
 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join