You've probably read about this before somewhere on ATS, but I don't think we've ever had a thread dedicated to this topic so that we could all put
our heads together and get to the bottom of this conspiracy, so that we can "deconstruct" the disinfo surrounding these recent conflicts in Libya,
Syria and other so called "rogue" nations and figure out the real reasons why these nations are being placed in the line of fire. There was a thread
posted the other day called Grim view of Syrian conflict
, and in that thread is a
video showing the complete devastation of a city area in Syria. The once bustling city is completely deserted and the once standing buildings all
around are torn to shreds, it's looks like something out of an apocalypse movie.
First I watched it happen in Libya, I saw much of their nation bombed into smithereens by NATO and UN forces. When I watched that Syrian video
something inside of me snapped... I really just couldn't believe how the world I live in is so different to the world they are currently facing. I
fail to understand how can people do this stuff to each other... why are there not better ways of solving these problems? Why do people refuse to
acknowledge the fact that this is a billion times more "terror" than would have ever occurred had this western intervention been avoided... why can't
our western Governments just mind their own business? What the hell is wrong with us that we can consciously inflict this type of pain and suffering
on other human beings?
I note that today that thread with the video has only 4 flags and 4 replies and it is now dead... when clearly it should have hundreds of replies and
hundreds of flags, people should be furious that this is happening, they should be outraged in the same way we were apparently outraged when the
Syrian Government had a so called "crackdown" on its protestors (as if western nations have never hurt those who voice dissent towards the
Governments). Well I say it's high time we pay more attention to these atrocities, stop ignoring reality and filtering out the stuff which makes you
depressed and angry! People need to look the problem straight in the face, stop turning away and burying your head in the sand god damn it!!!
First, lets review some of the painstakingly obvious similarities between Libya and Syria shall we...
The last point is the one we are really interested in because it's the topic of this thread. I learnt early on that Libya had this type of state
controlled central bank and since that time I've strongly believed one of their main reasons for invading Libya was to establish a conformist
Rothschild type central bank. In the article below, they list many things which reminded me of Libya (such as how the Syrian Government provided free
education up to university level, free medical care and subsidized housing for all its people, etc)... but they also mention something else Syria had
in common with Libya: that Syria also had a similar type of central banking system. Pay careful attention to the following excerpt:
Most of the banks, including the Central Bank of Syria, Commercial Bank of Syria, Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Industrial Bank, Popular Credit
Bank and Real Estate Bank, are STATE owned, a system of banking, which is anathema to the Western model of debt finance, which is based on fractional
reserves and creates money out of nothing at interest.
The Truth About Syria
The same applies (or did previously apply) for the Central Bank of Libya:
Currently, the Libyan government creates its own money, the Libyan Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that Libya
is a sovereign nation with its own great resources, able to sustain its own economic destiny. One major problem for globalist banking cartels is that
in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central Bank and its national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero
dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy but
this is certainly at the top of the globalist agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.
Globalists Target 100% State Owned Central Bank of Libya
The probability of this being a mere coincidence is looking lower and lower... but just how many nations have state controlled central banks which
issue currency in this way? You may be surprised to find out the number is surprisingly low... at present the number is in the range of 3 to 6
nations. The first piece of information I came across concerning this issue was found in this interesting thread posted near the start of this year
which received over 100 flags:
Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven:
Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and
by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
Now this is getting very interesting in my opinion... is it a coincidence that many of these countries are treated as extremist/rogue nations, and is
it a coincidence we have been invading them one-by-one and establishing our stupid private western style central banks in all those who resist us?
Well I started to dig a little deeper, and I discovered that the U.S. is already implementing
sanctions aimed at shutting down Iran’s central bank
... and I also stumbled across
the following eye-popping article:
Another provocative bit of data circulating on the net is a 2007 Democracy Now! interview of US Gen. Wesley Clark (Ret.). In it he says that about
ten days after September 11, 2001, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Clark was surprised and asked why.
"I don't know!" was the response. "I guess they don't know what else to do!" Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries
in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
What do these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks
of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers' central bank in
Libya: All About Oil, or All About Banking?
That's a pretty suspicious list of countries right? Yeah that's what I thought too... but I'm not so sure about Lebanon and Somalia, just because they
aren't a part of the 56 member banks doesn't necessarily mean they don't have non-conformist Rothschild Central Banks... does it? The first article
claimed there were only 3 countries remaining without that type of Central Bank system, however a very interesting
post by Canadianpride420
states there are actually 5:
There are currently 5 countries, not 3. They are Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Venezuala.
Venezuala payed off all debt to the IMF and world bank in 2007 under Chavez. They control their own bank now and now debt free.
Sudan still does not have a Rothschild controlled bank. South Sudan does yes, but Sudan does not.
But if we add Syria to that list (I don't think the Rebels have established a Rothschild Central Bank yet), the number would be 6... however, once
again I'm not so sure about Venezuela, just because they payed off their debt to the IMF and World Bank doesn't necessarily mean they have a
state-owned central bank. I made this thread so we can basically look deeper into this and build a solid list of countries who aren't part of the
globalist banking structure yet, which would indicate they are targets and could be attacked like Syria or Libya... but this is basically what it
looks like to me so far:
Countries that still have state-owned Central Banks:
Recently changed to Rothschild-owned Central Banks:
Possibly have state-owned central banks?
edit on 23/6/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)