While bumbling around Youtube, i came across this video. Apologies if this have been posted here before, but I have my doubts since this footage
exposes some of the lies the "9/11 inside job" proponents are spinning so I have no doubt this would be swept under the rug. Please watch...
After careful review of the video, several important observation are immediately visible...
LIE NUMBER ONE: there were no fires in the towers.
Advance to .56 and you can see the fires in the building with your own eyes, particularly how widespread the fires were. When the tower collapsed you
can see flames coming out several floors down and across
Also, advance to 1.15, which shows a close up of the exact point where the tower began to collapse, and you will see fires burning in the interior of
LIE NUMBER TWO: the towers collapsed symmetrically.
Although this can be seen in several points, the clearest point is at .46, where you can see when the collapse began, the upper section of the south
tower actually toppled over and fell down approximately at a 45 degree angle while dramatically caving inward. The reason for this becomes obvious
when it's pointed out that the upper section fell toward the bias where the plane impacted into the building, like a chair falling when one of the
legs is cut.
Plus, advance to 1.06, and you will notice something incredible- approximately half of the exterior section of the building was standing upright by
itself for several seconds. The only way this can be physically possible is if the interior floors of the structure had been stripped off until it
collapsed in turn.
LIE NUMBER THREE- the towers were brought down by demolitions
Point 1.17 shows the precise location where the south tower began to collapse. You will note there are NO explosions, NO bright flashes, NO debris
beign thrown clear, and NO pyroclastic clouds at that point. You WILL, however, see what was arguably the strongest point of the building (the
corner) being weakened to the poitn where it caved inward like crushing a beer can.
Still not convinced? Take a look at this video- the collapse of the North tower...
You can see throughout the first 30 seconds there was a fire burning throughout almost the entire floor, several floors below the impact area (that
long orange line). Plus, at .31 you can see a crystal clear view of the center section of the building collapsing before the left and right sections
did. This means it did NOT collapse symetrically, but that some sections collapsed while other sections on the same level remained upright for a few
moments. It can be seen even more clearly at 1.40.
This wasn't even remotely a controlled collapse, as the videos themselves show they collapsed in as completely a nonsymmetrical way as it gets, and
this wasn't even remotely a demolition, as there wasn't a single explosion, not a single flash nor a single pyroclastic cloud at the points of
collapse where demolitions would have to be if they were the cause of the collapse, but rather fires and the crushing of structural supports. Since
it's also irrefutably been show there were fires burning in these locations, and since it's also irrefutably been shown the collapse began literally
at the point of impact of the planes, it necessarily means that a combination of impact damage and loss of structural integrity from the fires were
the cause of the collapse, regardless of whatever beef it is you have with NIST, FEMA, or Jar Jar Binks.
I invite anyone to point out why anything I said is incorrect.