It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nancy Pelosi: GOP is ‘Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez-Faire’

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 12:16 AM
link   
story from CNS News
Video

Pelosi: GOP is ‘Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez-Faire’
 

Nancy is really losing it lately. Yesterday it was Karl Rove

Today's wild rant is about "them" Republicans




On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said congressional Republicans have stalled and diverted attention from legislation that would create jobs because they embrace a philosophy of “laissez, lassez, laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez, laissez faire.”

 



And this rant is about the Holder contempt of congress charges:

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi decried a house panel's vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress saying it was a frivolous use of the power

&title=Repeating-Pelosi-Undermine]video

Real "diplomatic" there Nancy

Is Nancy Mad or What ??





posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 12:18 AM
link   
Of course Nancy is mad as a hatter. That's her "charm".



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 12:58 AM
link   
She's a shape shifting alien. Look at how her neck skin kinda just floats around when she talks.




posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 01:08 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


When I first saw that, I thought she was stroking out on live TV.


I don't wish for that, however I do wish she would just retire.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 01:31 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Why dear Nancy I have traveled the country some and from what I gather when someone says "bless their hearts"....it means nothing of a blessing.

I just want to know who she is talking about. Who is advocating complete anarchy and rule with no governing structure? Sure a hands off approach, but I guess what ever will whip the masses into full effect just keep repeating it over and over.

I wonder how many Marxist even can stand this lady.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 01:39 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Typical socialist rant. She sure emphasized the need for regulations....as if we didn't already have too many.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 05:20 AM
link   
reply to post by ownbestenemy
 



Who is advocating complete anarchy and rule with no governing structure?


That would be the GOP, that's who.

To right wingers, it's all about the free market baby. The government just gets in the way with it's OSHA, and it's EPA, and it's Labor Laws, and it's Regulations and it's SEC, and it's Taxes. If the Government would just get it's jack boots off the necks of the holy "Job Creators" they would be able to fix this economy overnight.

Oh sure, maybe going to work might be a death sentence, but hey, if you're not a lazy good for nothing socialist, you will accept a job paying .50c an hour with the real possibility of death at every turn.

And the Economy would have recovered much faster if Obama didn't force Bush to sign TARP at gunpoint. It's the holy "Job Creator's" right to bundle securities, chop them up and sell them off and they should be able to do whatever it takes to make a buck, no matter what it might do to the economy if and when their bets fall through.

I mean those damn child labor laws alone has turned us into a nation of raising little socialists from birth. Damn that 2 year old should be able to go out and get a job, lazy good for nothing little commie! Education? Why, learn on the job, if you're parent's were rich you would be good enough for an education, but there not, so that kid better start pulling his own weight! You want to learn to read? Read the bible it's the only book worthy of reading anyway unless it's published by a right wing pundit.

And dammit grandma, if you weren't a good for nothing commie, you wouldn't need social security to live on. How dare you pay into that your whole life and fully expect to take it once you turn 65! You probably go to a store and pick out products, pay for them, and expect to take them home too! Don't you know that social security the only Ponzi Scheme in all of history? Bernie Madoff was a saint of free enterprise and this socialist cabal took him down unfairly. If you don't want to get ripped off by a con man, then dammit that's your problem alone. The government shouldn't get involved with things like that.

Hell, that money in social security should be immediately turned over to wall street, the only people on the planet that can handle money correctly! The holy "Job Creators" can use that money to get more wealthy on, and as we all know, once a person is wealthy, they become extremely generous with their wealth and shower it upon those that worshiped them sufficiently enough.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by HauntWok
 


If you think the Right is looking for absolutely no Government you are sadly mistaken. What the right does advocate is less regulation that creates jobs only in other countries. It advocates less Government agencies that serve to purpose other than to further stomp on creativity and liberty. Bigger Government means bigger taxes to pay for it. Idiots who have never had a job in their life are creating a monumental behemoth thru legislation. They are clueless and unable to realize and look forward to see what the fallout might be due to their ignorance and misplaced zealotry.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by HauntWok
 


Oh don't worry, Obama had no problem finding ways to spend leftover money from TARP

thehill.com...



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 03:28 PM
link   
She's using hyperbole if not outright lies.

Perhaps (just my opinion based on listening to her multiple rants).........early stages of dementia?



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by HauntWok
 


That was like reading a chain email Haunt....you have any of your own ideas or do you believe that conservatives, Republicans and everyone else not buying into your Marxist dung heap believe what you wrote?!

I guess you would have rejoiced if she was rambling on about "we need tighter and tighter and tighter and tighter controls on the People (personally she wouldn't capitalize "the People" for her utter disdain for Individuals) and if only we can just turn the screw a bit more than life in this country will be so good. Just let us rule you silly people....tighter and tighter and tighter control will work!"



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 04:14 PM
link   
GOP is ‘Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez, Laissez-Faire’

Isn't that what the definition of what "liberal " means?

Pelosi it is time to retire, and has been way past due the more she speaks the more I think it is senility.




top topics



 
6

log in

join