It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BBC.news
This is the second time in a month that the Chicoutimi has been involved in a rescue at sea.
Miscalculations were made in the design of the main motor. During sea trials of the lead ship of the class, it was noticed that an emergency reversal ("crash back") would generate currents of more than 60,000 amps, which resulted in catastrophic and spectacular complete loss of propulsion.
The diesels were originally designed for use in railway locomotives, and were not intended to be rapidly stopped and started. Shutting them down after snorkling led to many failures. Similarly, the motor-generators were operated a full power for longer than expected, and consumed brushes and filters rapidly.
Originally posted by tobermory
for the full story:
news.bbc.co.uk...
We knew about this hours ago.
The embarrassing thing is we (The UK) only officially transferred/sold the sub to the Canadians on Saturday. and:
BBC.news
This is the second time in a month that the Chicoutimi has been involved in a rescue at sea.
We've had the Royal Air force out all day supporting it and the important thing is that although people are hurt no-one is serious enough to need evacuating. ( The RAF would have sorted this out by helicopter if needs be.)
They should be fine for the time being, the sub is on the surface and safe, they just need to hold on for a bit.
Originally posted by Hellmutt
The incident will come as a huge embarrassment for the Ministry of Defence, coming only four days after the vessel was formally handed over to the Canadians. It was the last of four such submarines bought in a deal dogged by escalating costs, delays and reports of corrosion, leaks, turbine breakdowns and other technical faults encountered during their refits. Only one is on active service. Some reports have suggested that Canada is considering suing Britain over the deal."
Originally posted by deevee
Just heard on the 6 oclock news that Lt. Saunders has died.
Guardian: No blame in fatal fire on submarine
Canada's navy concluded yesterday that no one was to blame for the death of a young officer killed by an electrical fire last October aboard a submarine bought from Britain.
An investigation report released yesterday by a naval board of inquiry concluded that the fire was the result of seawater splashing on high-voltage cables, and that no one was to blame for death. The board also ruled that the submarine was safe and ready to proceed to sea at the time of the accident.
"The board finds that neither Lt Saunders nor any other person was responsible" for his death, said the 700-page report.
Originally posted by valkeryie
Just heard on Global News that Canada "may" have bought the subs to make the USNavy happy. War games with diesel electric subs would be useful as all the enemies of the US use dielsel electric subs. So Canada pays nearly $1Billion of its very limited defense budget to play games with the US. I pray for the sailor's family. This should not have happened.