If Hitler was a Zionist, Why Did He Arrest Louis de Rothschild? (1938 newspaper clipping)

So there was a thread about Zionists using Hitler to create Israel, and lots of theories say Hitler was a Rothschild offspring, or that since Nazi is found in AshkeNAZI Hitler must have been working with them, and so on. Well it's a nice theory, and makes sense if you think both Hitler and Zionists are racial supremacists, but there's one problem, Hitler's documented war against the Rothschilds.



www.hopesite.ca...

How could Hitler be working with the zioists, a puppet of zionists, or an offspring of zionists, if he arrested one of the Rothschilds? The wealthiest, most powerful zionist family, who have a street named after them in Israel, was arrested by Hitler, yet Hitler is a zionist? No way.

reply to post by Lord Jules


Well this doesn't really prove anything either way.
Think about it, if you wanted to disguise the fact this would be the easiest way to make people think you were not in bed with them.

Perhaps that was his conviction. Maybe that is why he wanted to decimate the jewish population. It would make a little sense if that were the case.

But that is just one rothschild, out of many rothschilds that are in the same position. And other various families. Perhaps not working with the zionists knowingly, through some sort of proxy like perhaps.. various 'multionational' companies selling to the nazi war machine.. (coke, ibm as examples, oil too) that are under zionist control.

Layers of secrets...

Originally posted by HumanCondition
reply to post by Lord Jules

 

Well this doesn't really prove anything either way.
Think about it, if you wanted to disguise the fact this would be the easiest way to make people think you were not in bed with them.

The house oversight panel just held Holder in contempt, I guess that is just their disguise because they are actually working together.

The terrorists on 9/11 must have been working with the 3000 victims of 9/11, perfect disguise.

Alex Jones has a poster competition of who can make Obama look like the worst dictator, all just a disguise to hide Alex Jones' connections to Obama

everyone on ats expressing disgust at the TSA and growing police state, just a disguise of their love for each other.

Brutus killed Caesar, all a disguise, they were working together.

William Wallace waging war against the English? Nah, best buds.

Israel's genocide against Palestinians? Just a mask to prevent you from knowing they are working together.

USA and Israel waging a covert war against Iran? In bed with each other.

Hitler expelling the Jews? He loved them, he deported them so you would not find this out.

Romans crucifying Jesus? Just to disguise their secret bond they shared with each other.

I could go on but why bother. Obviously I'm dealing with closed minds here.

Hitler was not a zionist.

The only reason that people make the crazy claim is because the US Bankers were laying bets with each side up until the US entered the war.

Hitler also kicked the Masons out of Germany. Hitler was against any group that was not for the common good.

Hitler was actually fighting against everything that we are fighting against today which is odd.

This proves nothing. These blood line family's fight amongst each other just like any other.

Originally posted by Germanicus
Hitler was not a zionist.

The only reason that people make the crazy claim is because the US Bankers were laying bets with each side up until the US entered the war.

Hitler also kicked the Masons out of Germany. Hitler was against any group that was not for the common good.

Hitler was actually fighting against everything that we are fighting against today which is odd.

I do not know much about the topic but I have heard that Hitler was getting direct funds from the Rothschilds.

Originally posted by Infi8nity
This proves nothing. These blood line family's fight amongst each other just like any other.

Just like any other what? Family? When was the last time you arrested one of your family members and held them fo ransome?

If this kind of thing is common place, then it should be fairly easy for you to find a newspaper article, as I did, of a different person arresting a Rothschild and holding them for ransom. And I don't want to see anything about Murdoch or Mubarak or some other small fry. Rothschild or you got nothing.

Originally posted by Infi8nity

Originally posted by Germanicus
Hitler was not a zionist.

The only reason that people make the crazy claim is because the US Bankers were laying bets with each side up until the US entered the war.

Hitler also kicked the Masons out of Germany. Hitler was against any group that was not for the common good.

Hitler was actually fighting against everything that we are fighting against today which is odd.

I do not know much about the topic but I have heard that Hitler was getting direct funds from the Rothschilds.

edit on 20-6-2012 by Infi8nity because: (no reason given)

I wouldnt be surprised. An allied victory was far from certain. The American public didnt care about 'jews' or have any desire to enter the war early on.

Bankers like Prescott Bush were backing him. Henry Ford was a big supporter of Hitler before the war. Many people thought Hitler and Germany were awesome. Charles Lindbergh was a big fan of Hitler.

Bankers have no sovereignty anyway I guess. But it isnt that shocking that they were backing him early.

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Originally posted by HumanCondition
reply to post by Lord Jules

 

Well this doesn't really prove anything either way.
Think about it, if you wanted to disguise the fact this would be the easiest way to make people think you were not in bed with them.

The house oversight panel just held Holder in contempt, I guess that is just their disguise because they are actually working together.

The terrorists on 9/11 must have been working with the 3000 victims of 9/11, perfect disguise.

Alex Jones has a poster competition of who can make Obama look like the worst dictator, all just a disguise to hide Alex Jones' connections to Obama

everyone on ats expressing disgust at the TSA and growing police state, just a disguise of their love for each other.

Brutus killed Caesar, all a disguise, they were working together.

William Wallace waging war against the English? Nah, best buds.

Israel's genocide against Palestinians? Just a mask to prevent you from knowing they are working together.

USA and Israel waging a covert war against Iran? In bed with each other.

Hitler expelling the Jews? He loved them, he deported them so you would not find this out.

Romans crucifying Jesus? Just to disguise their secret bond they shared with each other.

I could go on but why bother. Obviously I'm dealing with closed minds here.

edit on 20-6-2012 by Lord Jules because: (no reason given)

Wow ok.. Think about this.
I never said that is what happened.
I was just pointing out that it really proves nothing either way. Nothing is definitive.

Originally posted by Infi8nity

Originally posted by Germanicus
Hitler was not a zionist.

The only reason that people make the crazy claim is because the US Bankers were laying bets with each side up until the US entered the war.

Hitler also kicked the Masons out of Germany. Hitler was against any group that was not for the common good.

Hitler was actually fighting against everything that we are fighting against today which is odd.

I do not know much about the topic but I have heard that Hitler was getting direct funds from the Rothschilds.

edit on 20-6-2012 by Infi8nity because: (no reason given)

I heard that too! It was something to do with the Rothschild's wanting the Holocaust to happen to gain enough world sympathy to allow Jews to have a Jewish state in Palestine.

reply to post by Lord Jules


I don't think Hitler was a zionist but there is a clear connection to why the Jewish peope militarized nationalists around the formation of a Jewish state. I see a clear connection between the genocide of WWII and how Isreal acts today.

Hitler went to a Catholic boarding school in his youth. His religious and political beliefs evolved and often changed to meet his drive for power and control.

It's a case of simple misdirection in order to obtain financial gain. The Rothschilds owned a bank called The Creditanstalt. Founded in 1855 and located in Vienna, this Rothschild Bank quickly became the largest bank of Austria-Hungary. It declared Bankruptcy on May 11, 1931 which caused a Global financial crisis which ultimately led to the Bank failures which created the Great Depression. Through a merger between the Rothschillds, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, and the Wiener Bankverein it was rescued and renamed Creditanstalt-Bankverein. After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, the Creditanstalt-Bankverein was targeted for Financial reasons. Racial reasons were also applied to redirect the true purpose which was to funnel money to Nazi Germany from the West by demanded compensation from the imprisoned Baron Louis Rothschild for losses suffered by the Austrian state when the bank collapsed which was left to Queen Mary and possibly the Duke of Windsor, Both of which, connected to the Rothschild Banking. Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild was "held" at least through July 1938.

Although the history books show he was imprisoned, he was actually "held" in Vienna's Hotel Metropol(This four-story building was richly decorated with Corinthian columns, caryatids and atlases. The inner court was glassed over and had a richly decorated dining hall)and after personally speaking to Heinrich Himmler his accommodations were upgraded. Yes, after the Anschluß some Jews were brought here and were interrogated, tortured, and killed, but please keep in mind this was the Nazi Germany Headquarters and they were not your every day Jew(no offense intended).

Hitler was keeping up appearances in front of his people while manipulating finances which a good majority ended up back in the pockets of the Rothschild Family and their Banks, through other avenues and people like Prescott Bush and his Bank, Union Banking Corporation. This however is actually is still being debated by some scholars. Either way, in October 1942 the United States seized the bank under the Trading with the Enemy Act and held the assets for the duration of World War II.

reply to post by HumanCondition


www.barnesreview.org...

The Nazis made a propaganda film about Rothschilds profit made from the battle of waterloo. Why would they make a propaganda film against the Rothschilds if they were working with the zionists?

Oh right, it's all just a clever disguise.

I guess 'Judgment at Nuremberg', 'The Diary of Ann Frank' and 'Schindler's List' were just "cover" for the zionists secret pact with the nazis.

If the zionists are willing to sacrifice six million jews and the rothschilds, then no one should be worried about Hitler, I guess we can at least agree on that.

'Zionists' have used WW2 and the holocaust to their advantage and continue to do so.

Hitler made a target of many Germans and called them 'undesirables'. These included communists, homosexuals, mentally ill, gygsies....

If Gypsies had managed to form their own state and ran around saying "never again" and calling everyone anti-gypsetic then it might seem like Hitler was in cahoots with the Gypsy.

Changi prison camp had horrific conditions. The guys that survived looked as bad as any human could look. Everyone apart from the 'zionists' forgot about it and went on with their lives. Why should something like this happen for example?

The United States Congress passed legislation in May 2001 exempting Holocaust survivors and their heirs from federal taxes on compensation and restitution payments received after Jan. 1, 2000.

www.claimscon.org...

'Compensation' for a minority because of something in the past is wrong. Before WW2 we were not giving the earth to indiginous people either. Compensation for minorities has become an industry.

Editing to add my comment: I wanted to be sure the Google embed worked first. This movie is 2 hours and 22 min long so if you choose to watch set your time aside. This Video is a very good explanation on Hitler and Zionism, at least in my opinion anyway.

Google Video Link

A lot of people talk about the prescott bush/hitler connection, so what is the actual proof?

m.washingtontimes.com...

Prescott Bush was one of seven directors of Union Banking Corp., a New York investment bank owned by a bank controlled by the Thyssen family, according to recently declassified National Archives documents reviewed by the Associated Press.
Fritz Thyssen was an early financial supporter of Hitler, whose National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) Mr. Thyssen believed was preferable to communism. The documents do not show any evidence that Mr. Bush directly aided that effort. His position with Union Banking never was a political issue for Prescott Bush, who was elected to the Senate from Connecticut in 1952.

I am by no means a fan of the Bush family, but facts are facts:

Prescott Bush was one of seven directors, so he did not have sole power over the bank. The actual supporter of Hitler was Fritz Thyssen, whose family actually owned the bank. These court documents DO NOT SHOW ANY EVIDENCE THAT MR. BUSH AIDED THAT EFFORT.

In fact, Prescott Bush was elected Senator in 1952. If he really did break the law, how was he able to still become senator?

Also, this Bush/Hitler story surfaced in 2003 when W Bush was seeking re-election.

So is that it? That is the whole connection? Trust me I do not enjoy having to defend the Bush family but that doesn't mean I am going to lie just because it's convenient to call Bush a Nazi.

There is a slight possibility Hitler was 1/4 Jewish that will never be proven one way or the other.

Hitler wasn't a Zionist. He was not related to the Rothschilds.

Quite honestly, I think conventional history books are accurate with regards to Adolf Hitler. Most historians agree that he was not interested in anything that would help Jews. In fact he blamed all of Germany's problems on them. I, also, would find it puzzling that some think Hitler was sponsored by Zionists...considering he would have nothing to do with them.

If I remember correctly, a few powerful Rothschilds were also caught in France after the Nazis took over there. They too were ransomed off. What is more interesting to me is why these top-level Jews were not put on a priority list for the concentration camps. When you are at war with a foreign people, you make a special target of their top leadership. Yet they were allowed to escape. This is more evidence that the goals of the 'holocaust' were not necessarily the destruction of the Jewish people.