I agree this shows some good faith even though it was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. However, if they could just release A pentagon video, I'd believe the government so much more. This is a start, and I hope it leads to the release of more information that answers questions.

Got that document dump last week. Several hundred pages and should be online soon at 911 Document Archive. Did not really see anything new in the stack though.

There's some really interesting stuff in these new FOIA CIA docs, but so much of it is redacted that it just raises more suspicion in my opinion.

There are some very curious titles here such as:

1997-01-06 – "Terrorism: Usama Bin Ladin Trying to Develop WMD Capability," Counterterrorist Center Commentary, CTC 97-30002, Central Intelligence Agency.

1997-03-18 – "Terrorism: Usama Bin Ladin's Attempts to Acquire Uranium," Central Intelligence Agency Intelligence Report.

1998-06 – "TERRORISM: Terrorism: Bin Ladin Threatening to Attack US Aircraft," Senior Executive Intelligence Brief [Undated- Cited in 9/11 Commission Report as June 1998 p. 342].

1998-12-03 – [Title Excised] Planning by Usama Bin Ladin to Hijack U.S. Airplane, Successful Circumvention of Security Measures in U.S. Airport.

1998-12-04 – "Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks," Central Intelligence Agency Intelligence Report.

2001-05-24 – [Title Excised] "A Group Presently in the United States Planning to Conduct a Terrorist Operation Involving the Use of High Explosives," Central Intelligence Agency Intelligence Report.

And the infamous:

2001-08-06 – "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US," President's Daily Brief, Central Intelligence Agency.

They had plenty of warnings!

US. Bin Ladln implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would
follow the example ol World Trade Canter bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the lighting to America."

After US missile strikes on his base ln Afghanistan in 1993, Bin Ladln
told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to a [redacted] service.

Man, I'd love to see the full unrestricted versions...

FOIA documents are just another means of disinfo..

try to locate a 'Tip Letter' sent to the Phoenix, AZ office of the FBI...in the April-May 1995 timeframe

about the 5 young Arab men witnessed going between classes at the Scotsdale AZ airpark for Pilot Training...Supposedly the 'tip letter' does not exist

the Tip told that the pilot trainees were potential terrorists with an intention of crashing Jets into high profile targets...
a FBI agent (an in-law of mine) was identified by name as a qualified reference that i was no kook
and was suggested as a person to head up a investigative team on Arab extremists in flight school across the USA

but "JK" never got any word or scuttle-butt about any 1995 tip letter to the Phoenix FBI
And my own individual FOIA request was a dead-end, no such document existed they said


but 6 years later ...right before the 911 operation... the Phoenix FBI office sent a important 'electronic communication' that flight schools across America were possibly harboring Arab radicals who were training to commandeer commercial airliners.... hmmmm

the timing of the Squad 16 investigations electronic communication warning to all Units
...6 years after the 'tip letter' and days before the actual 911 event...stinks

Originally posted by Murgatroid

Jamey Gorelick was later put on the “911 Commission”, presumably to help cover up her part in making the attack possible.

I believe she was put on it to protect Clinton's legacy - and by extension, help Hillary's political career.

Gorelick is a nobody. She can't make the kind of policy that resulted in that wall. It was Clinton's wall.

Originally posted by ADVISOR

Nice image, I see the key words of "DO NOT" have been redacted ... clearly blatant disinformation with an obvious agenda.

LOL.

This is NOT denying ignorance.

It is propogating it....

Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous

Originally posted by Murgatroid

Jamey Gorelick was later put on the “911 Commission”, presumably to help cover up her part in making the attack possible.

I believe she was put on it to protect Clinton's legacy - and by extension, help Hillary's political career.

Gorelick is a nobody. She can't make the kind of policy that resulted in that wall. It was Clinton's wall.

Oh, I think you might be surprised at just how "dirty" Gorelick's hands were/are. Don't misconstrue that to mean she had any direct involvement in 9/11, but during the Clinton years, when one of the AQ boys needed a little help, her name kept popping up as one of those running interference. So on the one hand, you are correct that she was there to cover for Clinton. But Clinton was obsessed with Bosnia. He could not intervene directly, but he still had those guys who helped out in Afghanistan that he could count on. When they needed cover for their operations in support of that venture, Georelick more than once handled the deed.

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous

Originally posted by Murgatroid

Jamey Gorelick was later put on the “911 Commission”, presumably to help cover up her part in making the attack possible.

I believe she was put on it to protect Clinton's legacy - and by extension, help Hillary's political career.

Gorelick is a nobody. She can't make the kind of policy that resulted in that wall. It was Clinton's wall.

Oh, I think you might be surprised at just how "dirty" Gorelick's hands were/are. Don't misconstrue that to mean she had any direct involvement in 9/11, but during the Clinton years, when one of the AQ boys needed a little help, her name kept popping up as one of those running interference. So on the one hand, you are correct that she was there to cover for Clinton. But Clinton was obsessed with Bosnia. He could not intervene directly, but he still had those guys who helped out in Afghanistan that he could count on. When they needed cover for their operations in support of that venture, Georelick more than once handled the deed.

John, I'm aware of her involvement in all that.

But she didn't make those policies. She didn't have the power to.

Clinton did, and she followed his directives about building this "wall". And it is understandable that Clinton would want that wall when you realize that he was first, a lawyer, and was of the thinking that it was imperative that terrorists be prosecuted in court after the deed. I personally believe that he should have been more focused on preventing terrorist acts, and should have put less emphasis on the legal procedures after the fact. I believe that this was an embarassment to him and to his fellow Democrats that the great fornicator made such a terrible policy decision that resulted in a lack of intelligance flow that resulted in 9/11.

That is all I am saying.