posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 03:10 AM
reply to post by gostr
I defiantly love a good cryptozoology case.
I do agree, that Montauk Monster case is not a raccoon. Not in the least am I swayed by that. I think that these things are simply not explainable
without DNA samples and extreme testing. That certainly applies heavily to a case like this where there are two separate cases, on opposite sides of
the country. That is two bodies to extract DNA from and compare them side by side and then along side the millions of other samples they have to see
what we've got here.
I think a lot a lot of things are possible to be honest with you. I thought that this was a great list with great evidence lined up with it. I do
think most of these people are not all being honest about what they've seen, but I do think a few select are completely dumbfounded by things
they've been witness to.