It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thePharaoh
ALL GOVERNMENTS BUY WEAPONS.......
supporting terrorism is something else............russia is selling/sending to a government, not lying about sending weapons to known terrorists who kill children...
peace
Originally posted by fnpmitchreturns
Originally posted by Soshh
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by TritonTaranis
Now, let me as you...can you DISPROVE that the protests in Syria are not foreign backed?
How is it possible to disprove that?edit on 19/6/12 by Soshh because: (no reason given)
How many times does the truth have to come out before Western imperalist deniers realize these so called "Arab Springs" are nothing more than a calculated plan to reshape North Africa and the Middle East?
So, when Gen. Wesley Clark talked about the coming overthrow of North African and Middle Eastern countries as a long standing Neocon/CFR plan 6-7 years ago and now magically it happens...
Along with the other ancedotal evidence it is clearly Western/Banker astroturfing in these uprisings.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by thePharaoh
ALL GOVERNMENTS BUY WEAPONS.......
supporting terrorism is something else............russia is selling/sending to a government, not lying about sending weapons to known terrorists who kill children...
peace
AND..
The Syrian Government has been supplying "certain groups" for decades.
Seem fitting eh?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by SLAYER69
Russia has been doing business with Syria for a long while now, why would they stop all of a sudden just because the West wants them too due to their convenience?
Your argument will hold more water once the US stops selling arms to Saudi Arabia and Israel and all the other dictatorships they do business with.
I agree though, in a perfect world all sides would stop providing arms, but "war is a racket" ave you may have heard and it's a very profitable one at that.
If Russia wants to deliver come helicopters to Syria, they should be able to do so. You know as well as I do if Saudi Arabia Arabia had any type of revolt they civilians of Saudi Arabia would get slaughtered with made in USA military hardware.
So you agree and accept the fact that the Syrians will be slaughtering civilians with that Russian equipment?
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by SLAYER69
that too, Obama has a smug look on his face while Putin doesn't even seem to care as if he's off in lala land day dreaming.
Its funny I thought about it that way when the conflict occurred in Georgia. But I felt that it was more so to test the Russian preparedness and as a distraction away from the Missile Defense Shield in Poland (During Bush years) which got approved around the same time.
Originally posted by onthedownlow
Russia was allowed to march into Georgia several years ago, and the lack of any formidible challenge helped to puff up the Russian ego.
Originally posted by fnpmitchreturns
I would say that civilians will get caught in the crossfire when rebels use them for cover and mix with the local population. I expect this in a civil war. This is only logical and tactically advantageous to the rebels and it makes the government look bad when civilians are killed.
Originally posted by thePharaoh
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
anyone ever thought that these two countries are playing the middle east.....russia pretending to help, then leaving countries in the lurch, like they did in...afghanistan, egypt, syria, lebanon, kudistan, armenia.... etc etc maybe hey
Originally posted by jrmcleod
OK first things first, the MV Alead IS NOT a Russian vessel. The media would love for you all to believe that she is when infact she is NOT.
I work in the marine industry for a company who owns over 300 vessels operating worldwide.
For those of you who don't know, every vessel has a "flag", this flag is the country which the vessel must conform with i.e. the regulations of the US if she was US Flagged and so on.
The MV Alaed is flagged by Curacao, a small country in the Caribbean, she is a Curacao vessel, not Russian.
At present she is sitting OUT OF BRITISH WATERS to the West of North Rona, about 44 miles from the Outer Hebrides.
This is another PERFECT example of how the media would love for you all to believe that she is Russian. She may be taking things from Russia but she is not Russian.
Location of MV Alaed
Flag of MV Alaed
MV Alaed Details
Search For Mv Alaed Inspections
You can search for her most recent inspections via the Paris MOU site. She had an inspection in March, there has been no other inspections since.
The last port she was in was Helsingborg in Sweden. If there were issues, she should have been stopped there, and a Port State Inspection carried out..
This whole thing reeks of PRedit on 19/6/12 by jrmcleod because: Adding extra links
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
Then there is C) get irrationally hosed and give the POTUS an ultimatum.....
or D) The ship was a either a decoy/bait/distraction away from the real shipment? Just a thought
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by GrandHeretic
Then there is C) get irrationally hosed and give the POTUS an ultimatum.....
I don't think this scheduled meeting between the 2 was a fore planned event if you get my drift.
Or...
Just impotently sit there with a glazed look on his face...
From AP regarding the meeting...