posted on Jun, 19 2012 @ 10:29 AM
Originally posted by Johnkie
reply to post by GoodOlDave
ow i was pretty sure the official reason of the collapse was the airplane and jet fuel Weakened the steel. What is the official explenation then?
SURPRISE! There is no "official explanation" for what caused the collapse of the towers. All that is nothing but propaganda you've been
indoctrinated to believe by those damned fool conspiracy web sites. There are in fact a number of possible explanations- the NIST report, the FEMA
report, the MIT report, the Purdue report, and I've even seen one from a university in Australia. They mostly contradict each other and none of them
ever say their findings are the definitive answer.
That said, I myself subscribe to the Purdue report, as they analyze a component overlooked in the NIST and FEMA report- the fuel aboard the planes
being an incompressible liquid and acting as a wrecking ball against the structures, which would have caused much greater damage to its structural
stability than what NIST and FEMA take into account. It has computer modeling to illustrate the claim which adds credibility to the theory, but I
support their conclusions because as a scuba diver I've experienced first hand the sheer force that a simple four foot wave can have. Imagine being
hit by 8000 gallons. Perhaps next year there will be a whole other report that explains in precise detail how the towers collapsed that will make
more sense, who can tell?
This of course has nothing to do with the OP, but hey, you asked.
edit on 19-6-2012 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)