It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pounding a block with a hammer stone leaves scars, or pit marks, and in the case of limestone, it produces whitish discolouration in or around the scar. Protzen sees the fact that the stones used in Inca walls bear similar scars as proof that only his own method had been used. He cites several writers from the time of the conquest in support of his view. Garcilaso de la Vega wrote in 1609 that the Incas ‘had no other tools to work the stones than some black stones ... with which they dressed the stone by pounding rather than cutting’. Jose de Acosta, a Jesuit priest travelling with the conquistadors, wrote in 1589: ‘All this was done with much manpower and much suffering in the work, for to fit one stone to the other, until they were adjusted, it was necessary to try the fit many times.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by MysterX
The problem is to associate x natural disaster with a y civilization(s). No earthwide destroying natural events have occurred, during 'our' timeframe - which would have been capable of destroying a world-wide civilization.
A small one perhaps but there is no evidence to support that contention.
To get to 'earth destroying' you have to go back to before human's and perhaps even mammals.....
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by St Udio
Well those excavations and studies of the finds were of all the 'savage' communities which surrounded the very few 'Oasis' of purely Magical people...
these communities of people that lived in a Magic Paradigm were scattered all over the planet but were surrounded by the crude & vulgar people that bred like rats
Touche'
Or they were just imaginary.....
Parry, riposte and disarm
Originally posted by St Udio
only in your personal Belief System are the Magical People Oaius' imaginary..
you deliberately exclude them from being actual because academics do not allow that theory to have merit in their belief system
how did it come about that persons like Viktor Frankenstein resided in a castle far above & remote from the villagers?
that--- my kind sir is an example of a Archtype that has lived throughout the Ages...
small enclaves of Special/or magical persons surrounded by common villagers who do not understand those which are ensconsed in their lofty abodes
Originally posted by stevemac1
My interest is the ancient stonemasonry of south america and egypt. I became a contributor and started a thread at the JREF site asking for explainations as to how the masonry at Puma Punku and other similar places was manufactured.
Originally posted by MysterX
But there is evidence to support the very thing happening as i have said Hanslune..frankly i wouldn't have said there was solid proof of the events of around 13,000 years ago, if there wasn't any.
Seriously, 13,000 years ago is no time at all..relatively speaking.
Gobleki - Tepe in Turkey is estimated to be 13,000 - 15,000 years old.
Puma Punku, Tiahuanaco is at least 14,000 years old, with estimates of up to 17,000 years by those that have spent decades actually on site researching the ruins.
I'm seeing a bit of a pattern with the general timeframes here...all seem to point to a time around the 13,000 years ago mark (+ / -), when things went pretty bad for our ancestors...the rock solid proof (no pun intended) of what caused these problems is being reported all over the mainstream science world.
The impacts from a large space borne body breaking up or multiple separate asteroids that caused massive destruction all over the entire world, is actual mainstream accepted fact, not fringe in the least bit.
Here are some established, mainstream links going into more detail.
This actually happened...all over the world was carnage.
It can't be a coincidence that many ancient civilisations went belly up during this time, including very high tech cultures that built monuments, the ruins of which still defy modern thinking about human life and technical ability during the time period.
Originally posted by stevemac1
reply to post by Hanslune
Thanks for your offer, but I'll wait for a while.
I was finally directed to this davidpratt.info...
It does not say anything more or less than what I stated and in fact reinforces what I said.
Originally posted by wtbengineer
reply to post by benrl
Exactly, I have no problem believing that the whole of history has repeated itself in cycles. What would be left of our civilization in 10,000 years if we were to destroy ourselves now. Not much I'd say, except the odd anomoly like we find now.
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by TheProphetMark
Despite that the artifact is available to any researcher for analysis, not many of them decided to test it!
Instead, the artifact has been categorized as a hoax - without any examination.
Here's another clue that the plug is a hoax, I overlooked this the first time I read it. Does anyone else notice the contradiction?
Originally posted by Hanslune
The Bosnians 'pyramids' are not accepted because they aren't, fairly simple actually
Originally posted by Xaphan
I find this subject very interesting. The fact that there could have been advanced ancient civilizations is very intriguing. There's just one thing I want to know, though... why do so many of you say that the government is hiding the evidence? Why would they care if we knew about ancient civilizations having advanced technology? It just doesn't make sense that they would try to hide something like this, when it wouldn't be a big deal if we knew.
Same goes with the human giants theory. What difference would it make if we knew that there were giant humans roaming the earth at one time? I don't see how it would benefit the government to keep that suppressed.
I'm not a debunker, and I'm not challenging your theories. I'm just genuinely curious about the reasoning behind the government conspiracy aspect.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The "Bosnian Pyramid" is extremely unlikely to be a natural formation.
Look at this mathematically, it's sides point to the cardinal directions with high accuracy?
It's angles are 45 degrees exactly from the base to the apex?
It's exactly 1/3rd taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza? Like we are talking exactly within 2 decimals rounded?
Originally posted by Murgatroid
The truth is impossible to understand to those who are deceived. You've already seen the answers to your questions but you thought they were lies.
Originally posted by MurgatroidYou are a victim of mind control and the sooner you realize that the better. Want to know the truth? Stop believing the lies. The two are incompatible. This is WHY this doesn't make any sense to you.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Who is not accepting them?
Or more correctly, who is telling the masses not to accept them? A handful of puppets at the CIA and SIV (Vatican Secret Service)?
Umm, hundreds of millions of people around the world are accepting these for exactly what they look like - ancient pyramids.
I would stop wasting your time trying to convince people the emperor is wearing clothes, and move onto the next piece of disinformation.
Originally posted by geolo34
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Hi there. New poster, and professional geologist here.
Actually these two last pictures do show natural formations.
- The first one looks like simple silt/clay layers that deposited horizontally (and remained horizontal). The external rectangular shape is just only the shape given by the people who excavated the outcrop. Which is why it looks man-made.
- The first one shows a bed of conglomerates that was tilted by tectonic forces. Conglomerate are sedimentary rocks that typically for in/around mountain chains. I suspect that the angle of this layer coincides with the slope of the hill.