posted on Jun, 18 2012 @ 11:17 AM
Part 1 of 2
Evolution is just a bad idea.
It’s been passed off as fact, claims to be scientific, and is offer as natural explanation for creation without the need for a supernatural God.
However when you dig into it you find that Evolution and creation actually have more in common than most people think. Creation has a supernatural
God, but Evolution has a few supernatural events that have to take place, plus it doesn’t follow the scientific method. If Evolution truly followed
the scientific method it would be bad hypothesis and not a theory. The only reason it’s a theory is the alternative is undesirable to most people.
Below are some examples of supernatural events in evolution….
1st the cause for the big-bang, it can’t be explained, but the going theory is our universe was created by an unexplainable event outside our
universe, maybe something like another universes colliding… This concept that a universe outside our own was the cause of our universe is the same
idea that creationist has, we just say the other universe is called heaven and God hangs out there. The big bang is almost the same idea you all just
removed God out and call whatever happened that cause the big bang some accident.
2nd supernatural event was atoms began to forum a few nanoseconds after the big-bang…. So basically the law of conservation of mass is violated,
(matter and energy can’t be distorted or created) was violated. Here matter, energy, and space/time is all being created, so evolution can violate
basic physics laws when help the theory out, I guess.
3rd supernatural event, life created itself.
So above is few supernatural event, yet evolution is all scientific. Evolution is not a theory, it’s a hypothesis pasted off as theory as solid as
gravity, and yet doesn’t even follow the scientific method. The scientific method in a nut shell…
Ask a Question
Do Background Research
Construct a Hypothesis
Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment and/or making observations
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results
So what happens when you apply Evolution to this method??????
QUESTION: did all life evolution as oppose to some type of intelligent design
Background Research : (could take days talking about this, but we’ll just say it seem possible evolution might have happen)
Construct a Hypothesis: all life evolved from a signal cell organism that created itself naturally 4.5 billion years ago.
Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment: Now things get interesting, the whole "theory" is based with life creating itself, it's the building
block for Evolution and where we all came from. Yet every experiment under natural and unnatural conditions to create life has failed. The closest
anybody has ever came I believe was to create a protein, and that a far cry from life. Now if the scientific method was really followed this so called
“theory” did not pass the experimental stage and is truly a hypothesis, in fact with the numerous of failed attempts at creating life, it seem to
be a bad hypothesis.
If the next step is to Analyzer your data and draws a conclusion, how is it concluded that the hypothesis is now theory with no experimental evidence
that life can create itself.
So here is why and how evolution became a so called theory; it’s all opinionate and objective reasoning. That just simply means observations are
made, and then they are made fit into the theory. This is the exact opposite what is supposed to be done when proving a hypothesis. The experimental
stage is supposed to be fair and objective, but it’s not when comes to evolution. Chimps have 98% similar DNA is go example of this, what does this
Is this an example of life creating itself, No!!, but what I can do is take this observation and apply to an evolution theory…..because humans and
chips have 98% the same DNA I can conclude that chimps and humans have a common origin from a single cell organism.
Here what’s bad about that, with that type of reasoning it’s just as valid to apply a conclusion to another hypothesis. …. because humans and
chips have 98% the same DNA I can conclude that chimps and humans have a common origin from a single creator.
All of evolution is based on this type of reasoning. Now, just because it may be logical to apply an observation to evolution does not make it correct
to actually do so, nor does it negate the fact the first part of the hypothesis has failed in every experimental attempt, which is life can’t seem
to create itself.