It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iron loses magnetism when molten or subjected to high temperature.Which calls for alternative explanations.To me Plasma core hypothesis seems to be a good start ,though flawed it explains many things which the high temperature Plasma is magnetic in nature too.If the sun's core is hydrogen plasma,the earth core could be highly compressed plasma too.
Like I said before when the fundamental assumptions are wrong ,the conclusions will be wrong too
Has the earth's core been observed in direct experimentation ?Not.Which is why useless theortical pseudoscience explanations are given that Earth has an high temperature iron core,considering that iron loses its magnetism at high temperatures.
The universe is 99 % plasma.
again you base your theory on the fallacy that solid iron at ultra high temperature remains magnetic which it does not.
When the fundamental assumption is wrong you get the wrong conclusion.
It has been considered, since Newton’s times, that tides and ebbs on the Earth are triggered by the Moon: the kinetic energy of the Moon’s rotation turns into the kinetic energy of the water movement on the Earth. If the above is true, then the Moon should be nearing the Earth . Besides, according to Laplace, the Earth should have two wave water humps. It was found, however, that the humps were shifted 2.16° ahead against the Earth-Moon axis.
Numerous meticulously accurate measuring experiments have shown, however, that the Moon is neither becoming closer nor drifting away from the Earth.
This paradox can be happily resolved by assuming that the Moon is positioned against the Earth at a strictly determined macroquantum distance
And the gravity system realies on neutron stars ,strangelets,black holes,dark matter which cannot be physically observed or inspected. EU stands better in terms of occam's razor compared to the gravity pseudoscience system.
and provide proof which can be physcially inspected and observed not mainstream theory bs
seismic data leads to only 10% success in oil well drilling.enough said.