Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Queen Elizabeth Is A Bloated Parasite by Infowars.com

page: 29
26
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by MRuss

Love how our little rag tag band of American soldiers defeated the most powerful military in the world.

Such a great little story! Don't you think?



They obviously don't tell the story of how France, that other major power had such a helping hand over the pond.




posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Debunkology
 


Or how the UK was pre-occupied with the War against France on the home front and neglected the North American campaign..

But this will be same schooling that teaches the US won the War of 1812...



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by stumason
 


Are you saying some of the History books and lessons are flawed and doctored?
Think we are agreeing on more today....if this is true.





posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by wiser3
reply to post by Physic
 


My comment regarding the Opium Wars was in response to this: "Sure,There is evidence of the Queen financial hands in drugs. Have you forgotten the opium war against China?" which was a comment made by Ludwig in which he seems to want to implicate the Queen in the Opium Wars which took place before she was even born!
I don't see the connect between his assertion that the Queen having a financial hand in drugs, which I don't quite believe, and the Opium Wars!

It appears that he would like to blame her for every evil ever committed by any member of any Royal Family.

Am I to blame if my Fathers Great Grandfather committed some form of crime? I hope not because if I were to blame we would ALL BE GUILTY of crimes we know nothing about!



Nice theory, maybe some retribution is in order?

Do you think it is possible they are still in business ?




www.whale.to...

In India as well, official Crown policy centered on protection for the opium market. According to one recently published account, when Gandhi began agitating against opium in 1921

. . . his followers were arrested on charges of "undermining the revenue." So little concerned were the British about the views of the League of Nations that after a commission under Lord Inchcape had investigated India's finances in 1923, ... because of the need to safeguard "this most important source of revenue."

. . . while the British Government was professing to be taking measures to reduce consumption of opium and hemp drugs, its agents in India were in fact busy pushing sales in order to increase the colony's revenues. (18)


Porter's proposal was brought before the League of Nations Opium Committee — where it was publicly fought by the British representative. The British delegate drafted an amendment to Porter's plan which called for increased quotas to account for "legitimate opium consumption" beyond the medical usage. This referred to the massive addict population in British colonies and spheres of influence (predominantly in Asia) where no regulations restricted opium use.

Lord Inchcape — who chaired the India Commission which endorsed continued opium production in British India — was a direct descendant of the Lord Inchcape who during the previous century founded the Peninsular & Orient Steamship Line and subsequently helped found HongShang as the clearinghouse bank for opium trade. Through to the present, a Lord Inchcape sits on the boards of P & 0 and the HongShang.

In 1923, the British-run opium black market represented such a seriously perceived international problem that Representative Stephen Porter, Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced and passed a bill through Congress calling for country-by-country production and import quotas to be set on opium that would reduce consumption to approximately 10 percent of then-current levels. The 10 percent figure represented generally accepted levels of necessary medical consumption.

The enraged U.S. and Chinese delegations led a walkout of the plenipotentiary session; the British rubberstamped the creation of a Central Narcotics Board designated with authority to gather information and nothing more; and the journalists stationed in Geneva henceforth referred to what remained of the Committee as the "Smugglers Reunion." (19)



Sounds like control of the trade still is being controlled by someone, any guesses on whom that might be or what country(s)




A chest of opium in 1820 sold for $2,075 on arrival at the port of Canton. While this figure tended to drop marginally as the volume of traffic increased after 1830, any calculation of cash valuation of the opium trade into China establishes a figure that very nearly parallels "the present $100-200 billion (when appropriate calculations are made to account for differences in purchasing power of the dollar in ratio to total volume of world production) in annual "black" revenues.

The assassination bureau


Narcotics traffic was the business of organized crime during the 19th century no less than in the 20th, and Britain's Opium War cabinet spun out a web of criminal connections that crisscrossed the globe. Prime Minister Palmerston conducted, the opium business behind a screen of respectability, in full public view.
What remained hidden — until the report of the Military Commission that heard evidence on the Lincoln Assassination — was the importance of Palmerston's secret life, as Patriarch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

In the interim, the Our Crowd-British crime syndicate turned to casino gambling and associated enterprises as the immediate area for expansion. The Lansky syndicate took the opportunity of Nevada's 1933 passage of specific regulations legalizing casino operations to turn that no-man's-land into a desert resort to house all the West Coast criminal operations that had previously been run on pleasure boats 12 miles off the coast of Hollywood. Lansky also moved into the Caribbean, preparing the way for the British offshore complex of unregulated banking.
edit on 20-6-2012 by Physic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 07:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by babybunnies

Originally posted by HumanCondition
At the end of the day he is right, and that is all that really matters.
The queen is a slag and she does not care about the people, she is obviously happy for them to live like dogs.
The monarchy is responsible for horrible crimes against humanity and they really should be in jail.

Ignorance is bliss and of course ignorant Englishmen will continue to support them. But it is understandable as facing reality would be quite shocking for most.



It's very easy for you to browbeat others from behind the anonymity of the internet.

I'd love you to back up your claim of crimes against humanity for the current monarch, in person, and identify yourself so that there is some recourse.

I'm far from a supporter of The Royals (although when you compare them to an American CEO, I think UK gets very good value for money for The Queen), but this sort of nonsense needs to be nipped in the bud.

So far no one has given me a legitimate response, this is no exception.
Its seems you cannot refute what I am saying so you try and discredit me by going on about some pointless crap.
I would love to make my claims to them but you and I both no that is not possible in this corrupt and dangerous system that they help control and enforce.
Billions of people live in constant poverty because of the system they enforce. If that is not a crime against humanity I do not know what is, and that's just one small thing really. In regards to you, your people have been living like dogs for centuries with them beating you down and destroying your lives. It is obvious they still hold this contempt for you today, nothing they do shows the opposite.

Being far from a supporter is not good enough, it is our complacency that lets people like the Royals, or even CEO's get away with the crimes that they do.
You do realize the royals help enforce the monetary system that the public pays them with. This is money made out of thin air that has the power to make millions of British live in poverty and agony..Clearly the royal family does not care.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:42 PM
link   
I can't believe some of you people. Cudos to the folks who recognize most in high places have no feelings for the rest of us. Really, I thought this was a site for people who could actually think for themselves!!! I'm with Alex Jones. Our media and magazines shouldn't be putting these people on a pedestal. They give orders for others to follow but do not apply the same to themselves. We have started applying the same status to our movie stars, politicians, and rich people. The same laws that we abide by are not always enforced to the so-called elite. When did America stop respecting the true heros of this country and start kissing up to a class of people that only use others. Alex Jones may be hard for some to take but I'll bet he'd stand up for you before the queen would.... Just had to blow off some steam. I'll save my awe and respect for the locals.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by ladyoutlaw
 


Talk about being late to the party..

You'll find that pretty every point you made (if you even were making one) has been covered off in the thread. I assume you read the whole 28 pages?



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:01 PM
link   
reply to post by mainidh
 


How dare Alex Jones preach capitalism than practice that theory himself
Where is his money supposed to come from, if he doesn't earn it? He's not asking for donations, he's selling a product.



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 04:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by badconduct
reply to post by mainidh
 


How dare Alex Jones preach capitalism than practice that theory himself
Where is his money supposed to come from, if he doesn't earn it? He's not asking for donations, he's selling a product.


Alex Jones gets his money from the same people who pay Rense. They could not afford their lifestyle on what meager money they get from advertising or donations. Disinformation sites are more common than information sites. Because controlled opposition is intended to lead you from the truth. Sometimes pointing out a real conspiracy is the hook that grabs you. Then they publish a bunch of garbage to muddy the waters, which covers up the real conspiracies. People should not blindly follow elected politicians, but the same applies to people who claim to be exposing conspiracies. If a website is too slick and well funded, that is the first clue something is wrong. People like Jones and Rense are not able to hold a real job in the world. These un-employables are paid very well for what they are doing.
Look at the print Weekly Standard. No one subscribes to it and pays for it. It is a propaganda rag 100% funded by the owners. Its sole purpose appears to be so Neocon Supreme Bill Kristol can go on Sunday morning talk shows and present himself as the editor of the Weekly Standard.
The web has been infiltrated too, not just the print media.



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 05:33 AM
link   
This world was built upon merit. And it is, the people, who exchange the values created, that makes them worth each other .One must sweat, and create something of measurable value, to be a value in eyes of others. To put it Python way, just because a wet hooker from a pond threw a scimitar at you, doesn`t make her an excalibur keeper. Brittons having accumulated the biggest external debt per capita in the world, show no evidence of being able to create measurable value, nor to reflect it upon each other, much less a withered princess sitting in her loneliness and playing away her miserable life by admiring useless diamonds on her crown and playing wortless rituals upon the oblivious.
edit on 08.15.09 by Advancedboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 05:46 AM
link   
I have finally figured out what is so wrong with the UK. Hear me out! You people have stockholm syndrome! You love the people that have held your nation hostage for over a thousand years! You worship this inbred family as God! The entire island has stockholm syndrome!

Oh. My. God. UK people I'm so sorry! *big hugs*! We can get through this!



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Advancedboy
This world was built upon merit. And it is, the people, who exchange the values created, that makes them worth each other .One must sweat, and create something of measurable value, to be a value in eyes of others. To put it Python way, just because a wet hooker from a pond threw a scimitar at you, doesn`t make her an excalibur keeper. Brittons having accumulated the biggest external debt per capita in the world, show no evidence of being able to create measurable value, nor to reflect it upon each other, much less a withered princess sitting in her loneliness and playing away her miserable life by admiring useless diamonds on her crown and playing wortless rituals upon the oblivious.
edit on 08.15.09 by Advancedboy because: (no reason given)


US and UK generally follow the same economic model . Export jobs, allow the super rich to suck all the cash out of the economy.
Your post displays total ignorance.



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 05:59 AM
link   
reply to post by stumason
 


I disagree, I found ladyoutlaw's comments very welcoming and points original and shame you want to just who try and blow them off, as some redundant points..with your personal insults...
edit on 21-6-2012 by Physic because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-6-2012 by Physic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 06:05 AM
link   
I want to know what this woman or this family does that is so damn special that you need to pay for them to live in a castle and raise their spoiled rotten kids? Because they have a crown? Here look, I'll go burger king right now fetch a crown and then you can pay for me to live in a castle! Fair enough?

Come on now. You say the woman has no power so who cares? Let the royalty go already. Oh but "it's about tradition!"? Tradition of what? Off with your head and spoiled brats pretending to be God? Seriously England, it's time to grow up.



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 06:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Lannister
 


You know, I actually thought you were open and receptive enough to have actually learnt something from this thread and from what people in the UK itself had posted and explained.

Obviously I was wrong and you would rather believe the rantings of bitter and bigotted non-UK residents who have never even visited the place and whose sole purpose here on ATS is to spew their anti-UK hatred and bigotry in direct contradiction of facts and the testimony of those who actually live in the UK.

I wonder why you and so many other non-Brits are so obsessed with the British Royal Family, and the volume and nature of posts in this thread and other's like it prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is indeed an obsession?

Personally I think there are far more important things in the world to concern oneself about rather than the doings of an irrelevant bunch of inbred toffs!
edit on 21/6/12 by Freeborn because: grammar and clarity



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 06:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 


Oh come on now. You Brits have your own sense of humor don't you? I can't make some valid points while poking a bit of fun?



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 06:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Lannister
 


We Brits have an in built ability to see humour in any given situation and to be able to laugh at both other's and, more importantly, ourselves - an ability that barring Australians almost everyone else lacks.

Your post wasn't humour - it was an attempt to have a dig at and express an opinion about The Royal Family and the British people as a whole.

And by the way, amongst her many titles Liz is the Queen of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, not just England - why is that so hard to understand - or was it just another crap attempt at humour?
edit on 21/6/12 by Freeborn because: grammar and clarity



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 06:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 


Why so hostile all the time? Does it really upset you that much when someone talks about some monarch you have nothing to do with? I mean yea, I get it, she is some sign of patriotism and all that... but so is our American flag that is, for the most part, made in China...

Really dude, I've met alot of Brits. I've known a few Scots that have drunk me under the table on a few occasions, but I've always had a blast with you guys. You just seem like you have a dry sense of humor and everything gets to you for some reason.

But yea attack the topic not the person or whatever the mods told me? So I'll just shut up. Few beers posting is not good I guess. Carry on with your serious conversation.



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 07:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Lannister
 


Thing is, you are deliberately trying to provoke and wind up whilst also making a point.

Sure, if I was sitting in a bar with you sharing a few beers I'd be able to understand the context and tone of what you were saying - that is almost impossible on these boards - and given the general antagonastic nature of a lot of the posts in this thread there was every reason to assume that your post was very much in the same vein.

I assure you, I'm not an overtly seriously sort of person, apart from maybe on ATS where I tend to get rid of all my seriousness, thus enabling me to enjoy life to the full away from here, which I do and despite encroaching middle-age, which I will resist with every ounce of energy left in me, I assure you I can still party with the best of them......and quite often still do.

Maybe one day we'll get the chance to share a few beers, who knows?
edit on 21/6/12 by Freeborn because: grammar and clarity



posted on Jun, 21 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 


Maybe






top topics



 
26
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join