posted on Jun, 18 2012 @ 10:51 AM
Well now... A mystery eh ? Lets think shall we, about the facts of this mystery then. Fact one, look at the name of the organisation in question.
ROMAN Catholic Church. Rome and the Roman Empire, was never a particularly safe place for a child. The merest hint of misbehavior was grounds, not
just for a beating, but for a knife blade across the throat. As you can imagine, there was also a fair amount of debauchery and sleaze, with buggery,
infidelity, animal love, and Christ alone knows what else, all considered appropriate discussion topics for a host and his or her guest. There were
also figures in Roman culture, who liked to mess around with young people, mind you, in that way the Romans were not unlike other cultures, because of
course the legal age of marriage (and one supposes, consent though the term ceases to have meaning below a certain age) was very much lower.
Roman culture was based on possession, power, and public displays of violence and oppression, and one tool in the belt of the social set that used
the whole kit to great effect, was sexual abuse.
The advent of the rise of Christianity did little to actually alter the motivations, and the aims of those in power in Rome at the time of its
coming. They still vied for power, looked over their shoulders constantly, and looked to avoid confronting powerful enemies, while continuing to abuse
and shame those who they saw as beneath them. Meanwhile, the Roman power brokers developed the bastardised version of Christianity taught by the RCC
today. The virtual worship of a godess (the Virgin Mary), the obsession over the "Saints" are evidence that the meaning and teaching of the Roman
faith, is something less than and more than, was intended by Christ. The simple fact is, that the Romans inserted a bunch of analogues of their own
pagan gods, and called them after the disciples in the Bible, and then later added other saints, so that the Roman people could better swallow the
pill of Gods word.
This was the cleverest thing they could have done. They looked at the original scripture of the Bible, the word of God, and saw that it forbade them
to alter the scripture of the Bible, lest they be cast down. But the Bible also says that even when one preaches the word in spite, or with an impure
intent, that it is still good that the word is preached. So knowing, they preached the letter of the Bible, while twisting their every sermon, and
envenoming every mass. Furthermore, those in power continued their abuses, including giving themselves more and more power, and indoctrinating untold
legions of followers, into nothing but doe eyed yes men, happy to hand over their fealty, and their sons and daughters without batting an eyelid.
Further down the road of history, the Pope and all his cardinals have continued the traditions that were established by the Roman origin of their
faith, and have done NOTHING to prevent the continued abuse of children,failed to prevent out right criminality on the part of those in high office in
their organisation, and failed to speak out against the Nazis during the second world war. Something, incidentally, which the current Liar in extremis
(Pope) should remember pretty clearly, since he was squeezed into his miniature jackboots and waving Swastikas around at the time with gay abandon.
I leave you with this... is it any wonder, that the biggest bunch of pederasts in the ancient world, spawned a version of Christianity as power
hungry, financially motivated, and thoroughly ridden with the cancer of evil, as the vile, venomous hybrid that the Roman Catholic Church became?
There is no mystery here. The real mystery would be, how the hell could the RCC avoid becoming a den of predators and sickos, bearing its origins in
mind? The answer, rather obviously is, that it could not.
Jesus never said that we should go to Church, or that there ought to be a centralised power base for his followers on Earth. He NEVER once suggested
any such thing. He never told his apostles to have a bunch of people (priests and cardinals and crotchety old perverts) stand between his People, and
him, or between his People and God for that matter. You may recall that he DID say "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father,
but through Me". One would have thought that if he had actually meant, no one comes to the father but through me, and my army of lecherous,
paedophile priests and attendant walking nightmares, then that is what he would have bloody well said!
As it is, with that one sentence, you can extrapolate that indeed, he never meant for worship buildings to be erected, or wars fought between men in
his name, nor witches burned at the stake over a bloody mistranslation of scripture, nor for generation after generation to swear fealty to a false
emissary, claiming to be his thrall.
You can also extrapolate, that if the RCC had ever been intent on Christs message, they would have known that, and never formed at all.