It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sinohptik
reply to post by rwfresh
I think that is an interesting perspective. One that I used to hold quite dear as well. I understand where you are coming from, in so far as I can (I choose not to minimize the true diversity of perspectives on the same "thing").
I do disagree, and its not because its paradoxical. The core of a paradox could be said to transcend duality, all the while confirming it. Mystery wrapped in an enigma, as they say. What I am proposing in my perspective is not quite as simple as it appears. I actually found it more difficult to accept "What IS" as real, than the other way around. And I view that our perspectives are part of "What Is," though a limited part innately.
I also do not feel we invented time. We came up with a concept and context, limited by the human experience, which describes the relative movement between "things."
Really, my entire post could be whittled down to a question I asked in it; "Is a fish not part of What Is, simply because they never leave the water?"
Originally posted by sinohptik
Originally posted by rwfresh
I GET that saying "it's not real" is unsatisfactory and their is a defense that it's a juvenile and stupid idea. But look around at what those on the very edge of quantum science are now saying.. look at what every gnostic tradition has said all along.
I love that you bring this up!
While it goes slightly off topic, it is quite interesting to see the similarities through time, neh?
Individual systems all looking at the same "thing," but the perspective is influenced by our cultural story. The Truth is accessible to all who seek it in this way. This also applies to us right Now. For me, science works. For you, something else might work. But by coming together and discussing it, we can come to a greater understanding of What Is and the diversity present, regardless of if one feels What Is, is real or not.
Originally posted by rwfresh
If the fish is in an imaginary body of water than it too is imaginary. Investigating the properties of the imaginary body of water and the land mass that may or may not surround it will never make the fish real.
Saying we invented time is not an accurate statement. But no statement can be accurate outside of Reality. Which is where all the problems and confusion come from. Naturally people disagree on what is real because neither party can communicate what they are not an authority on. It's not because "everyone is different". or we have different "perspectives".. it's because we literally cannot communicate Reality or Truth. If you or I could then we wouldn't be having this conversation. We (non)exist outside of the only thing that is True. Why would we expect to be able to communicate what is Real in what is not Real? Maybe you identify with something that is "part" of Reality. That would be a real trick from where i stand. But what would be even more impressive would be communicating that so that is was undeniable. It's not possible. And it's not because ONE of us IS real and the other isn't. Neither of us is in Reality. Don't sweat it.
Originally posted by rwfresh
Sound familiar?
Originally posted by sinohptik
Originally posted by rwfresh
If the fish is in an imaginary body of water than it too is imaginary. Investigating the properties of the imaginary body of water and the land mass that may or may not surround it will never make the fish real.
I understand what you are saying, in so far as I can. It misses my point entirely, but thats ok. C'est la vie.
Saying we invented time is not an accurate statement. But no statement can be accurate outside of Reality. Which is where all the problems and confusion come from. Naturally people disagree on what is real because neither party can communicate what they are not an authority on. It's not because "everyone is different". or we have different "perspectives".. it's because we literally cannot communicate Reality or Truth. If you or I could then we wouldn't be having this conversation. We (non)exist outside of the only thing that is True. Why would we expect to be able to communicate what is Real in what is not Real? Maybe you identify with something that is "part" of Reality. That would be a real trick from where i stand. But what would be even more impressive would be communicating that so that is was undeniable. It's not possible. And it's not because ONE of us IS real and the other isn't. Neither of us is in Reality. Don't sweat it.
I think the main difference is I do not choose to distinguish between "this" or "that" when determining what is real. I find it interesting that you seem to, or feel capable to do so. I also would find much of life easier if I subscribed to this philosophy.
"Well, its not real, dont sweat it!"
I am only perspiring because the suns heat is touching my skin. Whether or not any of it is real is irrelevant to my perspective or actions or appreciation, even if I do subscribe to the opposite boundary that you present. It is all real, or none of it is. Either way, it doesnt change a thing and I find it a moot point.
All the best!
Originally posted by sinohptik
reply to post by rwfresh
Please stop preaching and projecting on me.
You are not saying anything I have not heard or explored before. I also understand that many do not lend credibility to others viewpoints.
If you are interested in my perspective, we can have a discussion and I more than welcome it. If your intent is to convert, I am not interested. Just like I wouldnt be interested in a Christian doing the same, or a Muslim, or an Atheist. The dogma doesnt interest me. Correcting the inaccuracies of assumptions would take far too long.
I do not believe what I think, though the thoughts themselves are seen as part of What Is. They can be the deceptive movement that we get caught up in when discussing our perspective with another. As I have said before, its the very definition of missing the forest for the trees. That being said, it is a prime example to me of how the movement and motion of us can pull us in like a riptide.
You seem to say we are "no things" authoritatively. I see that (notice the words?) we are no-thing, every-thing, both, and neither.
Like I said, whether or not "this" or "that" is real is a moot point to me. Illusory or not, Here we are.
Would you like to discuss the topic now?edit on 19-6-2012 by sinohptik because: (no reason given)