It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by thePharaoh
This is your view of the subject, doesn't mean everyone sees the sky as blue.edit on 17-6-2012 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 8311-XHT
reply to post by punkinworks10
I think you are misunderstanding.. when people say we couldn't do it today.. they mean with the materials they supposedly had.... even with our vast knowledge of engineering we couldn't figure out how to do what they did with such supposed archaic methods.
I don't think it's a question of moving heavy objects that we would struggle with.. it's the precision the great pyramid was built to.. the planning that would be required for this level of precision and the fact it is still standing today after thousands of years.. hell.. we have bridges and buildings unintentionally disintegrating here in the US after a measly few decades...
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Hanslune
I have to reserve my detailed comments for when I am actually on a computer and not my iPhone. I shall share my rebuttals with you later. I have looked at Piri Reis as have others who claim to be experts on cartography and have determined that based on the hypothesis that a certain body of land might be Antarctica, but you act as if that was the only map that does so. The hypothesis has not been disproved by the "experts" so good luck with your debunking..
using AE technology is another matter, a nearly complete lack of experience in such a project and acceptance of very heavy losses of life and limb (compared to modern construction). The AE had master craftmen with generations of experience,
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
I don't get out they could have master craftsmen with generations of experience. Just what constitutes a generation, much less generations? I thought that was in regards to offspring? Their craftsmen could probably learn just as much as one of our craftsmen in one life time. Hell according to you, with our fancy schools called 'College', our craftsmen would have the upper hand. Now sure they might have had some kind of predecessor, we're the advanced ones, right?
Originally posted by 8311-XHT
I have come to a completely different conclusion. From what I have discovered I am completely convinced the Giza pyramid had 2 distinct purposes at least...
1. It was a huge particle accelerator producing cosmic rays - cosmic rays produce atmosphere. The ancient Atlanteans were trying to reverse climate change and the powers-that-be know this and are using this ancient story to manipulate the present. The massive flooding already happened because of this climate change. At the end of the last ice age there was a dramatic drop in cosmic rays hitting the Earth which caused the loss of the protective atmosphere that kept the planet cool.
2. The excess power this massive structure created was used to transmute elements in the King's chamber. Originally the pyramids had colored outer casing stones. The smallest black, middle red/orange and the largest white.
These are the three colors of transmutation in alchemy... they are also the colors uranium goes through when processed. Black ore, to orange cake to white uranium. I also suspect this uranium may have been transmuted to another unknown element.. such as element 115 which Bob Lazar said couldn't be produced on Earth. Maybe the Atlanteans used this element as a fuel to leave this solar system?
There is proof the Giza Pyramid was a particle accelerator... the exact latitude of the middle of the Grand Gallery where the particles were accelerated is the same number as the speed of light in meters per second... this means that the people who built the great pyramid built it to indicate this and they passed down their method of measure over the years through secret societies.
I had come to this determination that the Grand Gallery was a particle accelerator BEFORE I learned of this speed of light number built into the Grand Gallery..
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by The Benevolent Adversary
you will note i tried to type extant mummy but garbled it.
but even this evidence is not proof that pyramids were used as tombs. and this was of course the whole point of my statement .
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by The Benevolent Adversary
you will note i tried to type extant mummy but garbled it.
but even this evidence is not proof that pyramids were used as tombs. and this was of course the whole point of my statement .
Actually it is, its a pyramid, and has a burial in it, that is also why you find mortuary temples to pharoahs associated with pyramids, and the AE using the hieroglyph of a pyramid for the word 'tomb'.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
]
Would you care to provide some sources to that THEORY.
Did you ever read the information that states that the dynasty in question found the great structures, repaired them, built upon them , and retrofitted the pyramids to make it their own?
To say the pyramids were built as tombs for a young king just promotes your lack of understanding and shines a narrow view on what you claim to be reality. Your disk drive is full.
Originally posted by The Benevolent Adversary
actually i can think of a number of reasons why a mortuary temple could be associated with a ritual object/monument/site. the same goes for the word "tomb" particualrily when said word is a heiroglyph. as far as i know heiroglyphs are not actually words, as such, but instead are a type of amalgamation of ideas bound to a symbol, which depend highly on context/juxtapostion with other such symbols to be given meaning.
and what really makes all of this trickier (imo and i am no expert or even true amatuer) is the fact that the religion/philosophy of egypt seems to have a strange conception of death and other ideas attendant upon it. that is i doubt very much that their idea of death is anything like ours, and in fact might not be fully comprehended by western minds without great study.
i will not dispute the fact that pyramids have something to do with death/afterlife or something very closely related, but when things seem to be very different at a philosophical level between cultures then and now, one should be very wary about interpreting what meaning something had for them then using the thinking that one has now.
sometimes a cigar is not a cigar, and sometimes it is a great smoke.