posted on Jun, 17 2012 @ 10:59 AM
reply to post by R0CR13
I deny the So called Facts that are erroneous ...your evasive answers dont add a thing here .
Then show evidence that they are not – your personal opinion has little weight. I'm not giving links to you R0CR13 because unfortunately we both
know you wouldn't even look at them...we've met before remember?
The builders of the pyramids had various religious beliefs that changed from period to period .. it is no as cohesive as you would like people
to believe .
Yes and what beliefs did they have at the time they built the pyramids – those are the ones you should be concerned about
Your bias is toward the dogmatic support of conventional egyptology that has not changed and never will
You mean reality and evidence? Sure it is certainly better than blind non-evidenced belief, to which you confess and bow down to. If evidence is
presented (and it happens daily) I re-adjust my understanding of archaeology
You offer no evidence to support the graves surrounding the pyramids are of the same era as the great pyramids
…I happen to know that; one you will refuse to read it, two that by making that statement you show an abysmal lack of knowledge of the Giza site,
yet with no knowledge of it you'll deny the facts!, three your mind is fully locked and you are very comfortable in your little self made box shouting
out at everyone that you know the answers….if you will read material provided I will do so, but please state clearly that you will.
you assume it but there are no facts to prove the date of construction of the primary pyramids
Sure there are and they are accepted by consensus by the vast majority of those who study the subject, but you’ve denied them because they don’t
fit your personal bias
Egyptology is not flawless Egyptologists are not all correct by default you know that but pretend to.. it is denying all other points of view
that in many cases have valid point .
Never said they were, are all fringe idea (many of which contradict) all correct? Valid in what sense? Valid to you but scientifically supported?
Example fringe constantly states some other culture built the pyramids but then their eyes cloud over, their jaws go slack when asked to provide
evidence of such culture - while at that same time archaeology and Egyptology can provide indepth studies and evidence in ample amounts for the
neolithic, pre-dynastic and old kingdom......
You're like a fundy xtian on a mission ...
Rational atheist with a knowledge of archaeology facing endless waves of fringe propaganda – which reduces its victims to a religious style belief
in fringe concepts, lack of critical thinking skills, unshakeable reliance on what they been told to believe by fringe writers and the inability to
process information contrary to what they want to hear….
edit on 17/6/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)