Obama watches drone attacks "like porn" - White House Insider (Truth or Lies? )

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
The "White House Insider" is a HOAX, from a group in Ireland (The Ulsterman Report).

The Background to the Hoax

It started out as a way to pump stories out and vote them up to make money on Newsflavor and Triond.

Posted on ATS: About this "White House Insider"...What do we know?

To submit a story on "newsflavor"...guess what...you have to sign up as a Triond user. And who can sign up....ANYONE. Who can submit a story...ANYONE.

What is Triond?
Triond is a complete publishing service that enables users to easily publish quality content of any type, in any media format. We publish your work on a network of niche websites so you reach a wider audience, gain more recognition and earn more revenue.

My comment in that post.

While we have freedom of speech there are legal consequences for printing outright lies. If I was accused of this and it was published, I would sue them for defamation of character - slander. I'm not running for re-election either. So in this case if I was Obummer I would sue the author and the publishing service if the story was made up.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
The "White House Insider" is a HOAX, from a group in Ireland (The Ulsterman Report).

The Background to the Hoax

It started out as a way to pump stories out and vote them up to make money on Newsflavor and Triond.

I find it fascinating that the "expose" on Ulsterman is done by someone who writes for the same sort of organization, a competitor, in the same sort of way. This person is no more as valid a reporter than Ulsterman. If you are going to claim Ulsterman is a fake, you can just as easily claim the expose site is fake. Why do yiou favor one over the other? I would maintain all we have to do is know your politics and we could make an educated guess.

the fact is that Ulsterman now has his own domain. Yes, he has ads. So does the expose site. I find the expose site's arguments very weak. That begs the question, of course. The White House Insider may still be a fake, even if the expose is as well. As long as Ulsterman maintains this secrecy facade, it must be taken with a grain of salt. Note that the same was true of Deep Throat, though.

It's also a fact that we've been using these drones quite a lot. The last three days had stories of "drone attacks killing X people." The claim that Obama likes to watch them adds kind of a macabre element to the whole issue, but the MAIN issue is that they are being used to kill people. If the targets really are certifiable Bad Guys(tm) okay, but I just don't see how they could be so certain. The whole thing is disturbing.

The claim that Obama likes to watch this stuff may or may not be a lie.
The fact that the drones are killing people regularly is not a lie.
Which is more important?

reply to post by schuyler


The fact the "ulsterman report" latches onto whatever the topic du jour is when concocting their report is part of their shtick, they know people will run with the story so long as it reiterates their negative perceptions of Obama, no matter how unlikely the source is.

Even if he does....so what??

I'm willing to bet his schedule keeps him busy enough as is. When he has some down time i'd expect he'd being doing something else than watching drone video's.

reply to post by SUICIDEHK45


I think its bull. If he made it this far, he has been tested and vetted. It does not appear there is any conflict going on with him. He knows what he is knew what it would be like and what he has to do. I very much doubt he has any problem with being directed by hus puppeteers, else he wouldnt be there.

someone needs to censor Obama's Drone Porn..... It's only big news because they want to make DRONE PORN legal in Amerika!!!!!

So he watches drone attacks for 2.5 mins and then feels ashamed?