Have you ever convinced somebody that they should consider adopting a religion?, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 13-6-2012 @ 11:41 PM by Wertdagf
reply to post by jollyjollyjolly



you got a one out of a hundred chance to win...

make sure you register your vote. Im going with Zues.


reply posted on 13-6-2012 @ 11:48 PM by KnawLick
reply to post by jollyjollyjolly



This is a simplistic argument for a simplistic man. I am of faith too. But these days we are the ones that must justify our beliefs not the opposition.

I think we can do a lot better. We need to be talking about how science and religion are allies. Not reinforcing images of a bearded man reaching out for Adam perched on a cloud.

My religion is one of forward looking ideals, explained in the context of the modern world, not threats about salvation.
edit on 13-6-2012 by KnawLick because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 12:35 AM by jollyjollyjolly
reply to post by KnawLick



I disagree that it is simplistic. It does address the reality of a decision we all need to make. As a decision it is my responsibility to make a wise decision. I think we all idealize ourselves as good decision makers. Simplistic for a simple man? Okay. I hope to be a simple and plain man. Tossing judgmental overtones on suppositions is exactly what both firmly entrenched sides in this topic seem to be doing.

I cannot argue people into anything, just as it is with politics and many other issues. I am aware of the nature and state of belief in this day and age as well. I chose to refrain from making a case toward people that are not going to have any initial reason to believe. It is their decision. It is better, at least for me, to allot that time to those who actively question the validity of their response and it's outcomes potentials.

The poster further down states it is Pascal's Wager, and he is right. I just read the wiki on that and I guess I am not the first to hold this line of reason. Give it a quick read if you can.

en.wikipedia.org...'s_Wager


reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 12:50 AM by Mickierocksman
I can afford to be wrong, can you?

Let’s have a quick look at a scenario, the end of days / tribulation / the next coming of (insert god here) whatever you want to call it......

If your god turns out to be “not the correct one to choose” then you are in the same boat (if not worse) than say, an atheist who has not waisted their life chasing a fairy story.

Where an atheist who does not believe in any gods would have a better chance of being taken to a ”beautiful place amongst the clouds” if they begged for forgiveness.

I think if a god different to the one you were expecting suddenly appeared in the sky, you would not be able to function, you would spoil your pants & you would have a very difficult time convincing the real god that you are worthy to be with it.

Why does anyone have to accept any of the variants of christian gods during their lifetime any-way when all of them state that you can “recant on your deathbed” and be saved? I’m sure that if you have indeed chosen correctly you’re going to love hanging out for all eternity with all the atheists and non-believers that snuck through at the last second.

I also don’t believe that you have converted a non-religious person to your religion...... I’m suggesting they made you feel better just so you would give up thumping them over the head with whatever religious clap-trap you carry around with you.

PS: Accidently gave you a star - wish I could take it back.

Mickierocksman
edit on 14/6/2012 by Mickierocksman because: Added a space, fixed a spelling mistake and added a PS... then looked sideways for a bit, scratched my elbow and then hit edit again.



reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 01:52 PM by newcovenant
reply to post by jollyjollyjolly



Do religions have it so tough they need adopting? I can see adopting a littered stretch of road to clean up, I can see adopting a child that needs care and feeding. If religion needs care and feeding that sounds more like a monster you might keep chained in the basement. No, if anything I think it is possible some religions need to be embraced and adhered to - others need flat out rejection. None need adoption.


reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 01:55 PM by newcovenant
reply to post by Mickierocksman





I can afford to be wrong, can you?


Funny! lol ...This is what I say to the "man is responsible for climate change" deniers.


reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 02:16 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Man, your going to be quite upset when you find out the Jews were right and you have taken on a false god, thereby mocking the OT god.
Probably haven't even sacrificed any animals for the sins you have committed. tisk tisk,





Jesus Christ and his NEWCOVENANT banned sacrifice.

When Jews insisted it was WRONG NOT TO slaughter an innocent beast for the sake of the holiday Jesus said, "Hold up there fella - there are some new rules I am giving you. You misunderstood the old rules and it has got hopelessly out of control. Dad is disgusted and threatening to wipe you out again so you better listen. This is the last warning. This is what our Father wants now. Write it down;"

My father desires COMPASSION and NOT a sacrifice.


Some people accept JC as the son of god, messiah, etc..
Some see him as simply a prophet
Some see him as a simple carpenter whom was anti-religious
Some see him as a myth
Some see him as a heretic

I wonder who is right.

The second part of the pascal wager is just that...the argument put forth is I can afford to be wrong, you can't.
But, then you have the issue of taking on the wrong religion, worshipping the wrong god, etc..
So, theists want to say its a 50/50 gamble, but in reality, its 50% to an atheist, and like 1/100th likelyhood for a theist that they got it right...
And as mentioned above, Would a deity be more forgiving for someone whom decided not to worship a deity until proof came along, or to someone whom was worshipping an enemy deity out of fear of it...it takes no guts to fall to your knee in the face of fear..it takes principle and strength to push aside the fear in favor of truth.

So, in the whole realm of anthropomorphic understanding of a deity, does a king reward courage to stand until truth is given or cowardice to kneel at the feet of the enemy...


reply posted on 14-6-2012 @ 07:37 PM by Mickierocksman
reply to post by imherejusttoread



Ouch.... that is me being skewered by your rapier wit - please try harder next time & sharpen your blade, it’s the true christian thing to do.

Mickierocksman


reply posted on 15-6-2012 @ 12:41 PM by newcovenant
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Man, your going to be quite upset when you find out the Jews were right and you have taken on a false god, thereby mocking the OT god.
Probably haven't even sacrificed any animals for the sins you have committed. tisk tisk,





Jesus Christ and his NEWCOVENANT banned sacrifice.

When Jews insisted it was WRONG NOT TO slaughter an innocent beast for the sake of the holiday Jesus said, "Hold up there fella - there are some new rules I am giving you. You misunderstood the old rules and it has got hopelessly out of control. Dad is disgusted and threatening to wipe you out again so you better listen. This is the last warning. This is what our Father wants now. Write it down;"

My father desires COMPASSION and NOT a sacrifice.


Some people accept JC as the son of god, messiah, etc..
Some see him as simply a prophet
Some see him as a simple carpenter whom was anti-religious
Some see him as a myth
Some see him as a heretic

I wonder who is right.

The second part of the pascal wager is just that...the argument put forth is I can afford to be wrong, you can't.
But, then you have the issue of taking on the wrong religion, worshipping the wrong god, etc..
So, theists want to say its a 50/50 gamble, but in reality, its 50% to an atheist, and like 1/100th likelyhood for a theist that they got it right...
And as mentioned above, Would a deity be more forgiving for someone whom decided not to worship a deity until proof came along, or to someone whom was worshipping an enemy deity out of fear of it...it takes no guts to fall to your knee in the face of fear..it takes principle and strength to push aside the fear in favor of truth.

So, in the whole realm of anthropomorphic understanding of a deity, does a king reward courage to stand until truth is given or cowardice to kneel at the feet of the enemy...



You would have to know the deity to determine that and I think that is what Christianity tries to do. Introduce you to a stranger...God. Now I am not sure I like those odds you're laying. Personal faith and belief aside there are many other confirmations of Christ and the gospels some from curious sources. Biblical archeology is always finding some reinforcement to the historical accuracy of the Bible. Dorothy Izatt seems to think UFO's confirm the existence of a deity. Other abductee I have found credible report that there is a grand creator and we are expected to show compassion and love, to lose the atomic weapons etc.. Many people who supposedly passed over in an NDE say the same or have similar reports to share - to me these all support existence of a creator and coupled with my own personal experience I am not at all sure the odds favor random chance.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Bill Nye: Creationism is not appropriate for children.
  Posted 15 days ago with 20 member flags
Satan hid the fossils to trick everyone!
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Just ONE question on evolution
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags
M U T A T I O N - Friend or Foe of Evolution?
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
When a Child is Born...the Evolution begins
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Denisovans
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags
Are Humans the result of Hybridization?
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags