reply to post by Gridrebel
The answer is very simple, and several members and myself have been giving at least some of the answers that would help feed more people...
All these claims that the atmospheric CO2 level is too high IS A LIE...
IN most of Earth's history the atmospheric CO2 content has been from 3 times to 8 times higher than now, and for most of that time live
It has been found in several experiements that HIGHER LEVELS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 than exist now are BENEFITIAL for all plant life, for all animals, and
IF the atmospheric CO2 content on Earth was 1,200 -1,500 ppm (right now it is at 380-390ppm) ALL plant life, trees, brush, etc would grow bigger,
stronger and provide from 25% -60% MORE YIELDS/HARVESTS... Which would help feed the population on Earth...
Successful indoor growers implement methods to increase CO2 concentrations in their enclosure. The typical outdoor air we breathe contains 0.03 -
0.045% (300 - 450 ppm) CO2. Research demonstrates that optimum growth and production for most plants occur between 1200 - 1500 ppm CO2. These
optimum CO2 levels can boost plant metabolism, growth and yield by 25 - 60%.
The Earth is CO2 DEPRIVED. It is a known fact that despite deforestation in the southern hemisphere, and other third world countries, the northern
hemisphere, and the green biomass of the oceans has been INCREASING.....
Earth has become GREENER, and will become GREENER with MORE atmospheric CO2....
But since the Globalists have stated many times part of their goal is "depopulation" what better way to depopulate the world than to restrict food
harvests by lowering the levels of atmospheric CO2?
There are even plans to "sequester atmospheric CO2", and I have been in contact with my Senate representative trying to convince him that this is a
really bad idea because they want to implement such a plan.
Atmospheric CO2 is not the problem, and it is not pollution/smog.
If you search for what "smog" is you will find that NOWHERE is CO2 included, the real pollutants are other gases.
The following is directly from wikipedia, the leftists number 1 source for news, and information, which also happens to be biased....but anyway...
Smog is a kind of air pollution; the word "smog" is a portmanteau of smoke and fog. Classic smog results from large amounts of coal burning in an
area caused by a mixture of smoke and sulfur dioxide. Modern smog does not usually come from coal but from vehicular and industrial emissions that are
acted on in the atmosphere by sunlight to form secondary pollutants that also combine with the primary emissions to form photochemical smog.
In the 1950s a new type of smog, known as photochemical smog, was first described.
This forms when sunlight hits various pollutants in the air and forms a mix of inimical chemicals that can be very dangerous. A photochemical smog is
the chemical reaction of sunlight, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere, which leaves airborne particles
(called particulate matter) and ground-level ozone.
Nitrogen oxides are released by nitrogen and oxygen in the air reacting together under high temperature such as in the exhaust of fossil fuel-burning
engines in cars, trucks, coal power plants, and industrial manufacturing factories. VOCs are released from man-made sources such as gasoline (petrol),
paints, solvents, pesticides, and biogenic sources, such as pine and citrus tree emissions.
This noxious mixture of air pollutants can include the following:
nitrogen oxides, such as nitrogen dioxide
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
peroxyacyl nitrates (PAN)
All of these chemicals are usually highly reactive and oxidizing. Photochemical smog is therefore considered to be a problem of modern
industrialization. It is present in all modern cities, but it is more common in cities with sunny, warm, dry climates and a large number of motor
vehicles. Because it travels with the wind, it can affect sparsely populated areas as well.
Where is CO2 in that list?.... it is NOWHERE simply because CO2 IS NOT A POLLUTANT, despite the EPA claiming the contrary.
Now, who will benefit from taxing to death a gas which ALL LIVING CREATURES EXHALE?.....
As it has been proven time and again, the elites do not want to feed all the world's population, they want to depopulate the world because it is
easier to control us, and if they can squeeze more money from us by implementing taxes on CO2, they become richer as well.
edit on 14-6-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)