It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Debunk this documentary. You can´t. ET Contact DOES occur.

page: 6
63
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 06:43 AM
link   
very cool! these ufo's are very similar to my two sightings that i have had. it's legit for sure.




posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Thank you for sharing

Flagged



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 07:53 AM
link   
I dont care who may say this vid is a fake!

I reckon its 100% genuine!

The way they are acting while telling their encounters, its too real. When the daughter went out with her that time, the way she was telling it and all her expressions at the same time is exactly how i would describe something, it is just too real to be faked.

Even though its been brought up before, i think it should stick, i couldnt care less...

I have been researching this UFO's ect, for a year and a half now and i have not come across this sweet sweet woman.

This video is a like the icing on the cake!



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:03 AM
link   
bunch of freaking lights man, that's all we ever see. why doesn't she describe the beings in detail that showed themselves to her?



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   
Look at the camera she uses. She could easily just stop the reel on one frame and shake the camera around then start again



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by ragsntatters
 


Oh sure she could, its that simple.

Lets look at what has occurred in reality. If she just shook it, they are saying it would just be a blur, and the worlds leading experts have already examined this case. Armchair "experts" are not the same. Funny how they rely on the leading experts to disprove the Jerusalem sighting, even though it was also picked up on a security camera, but when the leading experts say it would take a huge expensive stuido laboratory such as that hired by Walt Disney, to do this, suddenly they're evaluation means nothing. So the suppressors of truth HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

She has used different cameras. She even got permission to borrow the Unsolved Mystery camera mans camera.

Do you imagine he just let her shake it around?



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by kauskau

Originally posted by sheeplearepeople
reply to post by kauskau
 





the strange thing for me that people can not distinguish anymore between lying and acting..of course there are good actors but in this documentary there is no liar. Do you see one? Do you have a scene where you feel that someone is lying?



There's a third category that you haven't considered. Someone who is delusional isn't lying or acting. They truly believe something that is false.


of course. But in this case we have video material and a first class ufo sighting...


Can you even prove this UFO is an actual flying object?

No you can't.

...Like how I told the others , there is only one way to have definitive proof and it not by having videos,photos or eyewitness accounts; its having a massive ufo parked above time square still for on whole month. That's proof


And a bit of advice , chill out with the title next time. Being impulsive makes one look stupid.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by BloodSister
I dont care who may say this vid is a fake!

I reckon its 100% genuine!

The way they are acting while telling their encounters, its too real. When the daughter went out with her that time, the way she was telling it and all her expressions at the same time is exactly how i would describe something, it is just too real to be faked.

Even though its been brought up before, i think it should stick, i couldnt care less...

I have been researching this UFO's ect, for a year and a half now and i have not come across this sweet sweet woman.

This video is a like the icing on the cake!



You mean "icing on the cake" for your blind faith in green little old men.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by ragsntatters
 


Oh sure she could, its that simple.

Lets look at what has occurred in reality. If she just shook it, they are saying it would just be a blur, and the worlds leading experts have already examined this case. Armchair "experts" are not the same. Funny how they rely on the leading experts to disprove the Jerusalem sighting, even though it was also picked up on a security camera, but when the leading experts say it would take a huge expensive stuido laboratory such as that hired by Walt Disney, to do this, suddenly they're evaluation means nothing. So the suppressors of truth HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

She has used different cameras. She even got permission to borrow the Unsolved Mystery camera mans camera.

Do you imagine he just let her shake it around?


World leading experts?????????????????????

And who are they



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:47 AM
link   
ive seen these .....twice
the second sighting was with my girlfriend when we lived in monte rio California
except....we were outside.....watching these things dance and move through walls...appear.. reappear...just like in the interview....through the window of my next door neighbor
......
they were inside her house
they first appeared for about a minute outside our house...we followed them as they traveled inside our neighbors house....
they stayed in her kitchen and did all sorts of lightworks
after about an hour of this.....we went home....it got old...plus they wouldnt come back out.
she called them faeiries.....
they defiantly were something



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:48 AM
link   
reply to post by GiodanoBruno
 


I dont recall the name of the US corporate entity they took the video to, but its in the video's, and they're considered leading experts, why don't you watch it. They're the same kind of experts that supposedly debunked the Jerusalem ufo, which couldn't really be debunked because there were multiple sources for it including a security camera.

So many comments here from people who obviously havent watched the video or checked out any of the links, but seem to have a lot of opinons.
edit on 14-6-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Unity_99
 


To be honest I'd have to test that myself. It's so easy to do even with a still camera and any film SLR film camera I have. A frame rate that slow makes a lot possible. It's even possible she is being honest.



Just make sure while your testing, to do so on several different cameras, as she is using 3 or more now even. And even borrows anyone who shows up camera, including the camera man for unsolved mysteries. And had the same results each time.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by GiodanoBruno

Originally posted by kauskau

Originally posted by sheeplearepeople
reply to post by kauskau
 





the strange thing for me that people can not distinguish anymore between lying and acting..of course there are good actors but in this documentary there is no liar. Do you see one? Do you have a scene where you feel that someone is lying?



There's a third category that you haven't considered. Someone who is delusional isn't lying or acting. They truly believe something that is false.


of course. But in this case we have video material and a first class ufo sighting...


Can you even prove this UFO is an actual flying object?

No you can't.

...Like how I told the others , there is only one way to have definitive proof and it not by having videos,photos or eyewitness accounts; its having a massive ufo parked above time square still for on whole month. That's proof


And a bit of advice , chill out with the title next time. Being impulsive makes one look stupid.

a classic example of, "i wouldn't believe it if nailed me right between the eyes because i can't handle what i'm seeing" kind of guy. you shouldn't act so defensive, it make one look afraid.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 08:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by potatotomato2
reply to post by kauskau
 


If it's on YouTube it must be true, especially if the people being interviewed say it's true, I mean there are no such things as acting, lying, publicity stunts, hoaxers, scammers, profiteers, people looking for attention, wanna be authors, people that just like to be filmed, story tellers, fabricators, and/or delusional people . I almost forgot, and wanna be prentend "Reporters" claiming fake undocumented arrests of them and their son.



If its not on FOX NEWS it simply is not true


"Now watch this drive"



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
And also that the light streaks, dont just appear on pictures devoid of ufo. She is filming what many of us see, and similar to what James Gilliland sees. UFOs. And just like in James Gillilands case, people dropping by are seeing this too.
edit on 14-6-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
I cant buy into this completely until she captures some footage with a newer camera, even a crappy cell phone would be 100x better then an 8mm, thats why we dont use them anymore. Old cameras had a lot of faults with them.

Maybe If I happen to run into a yard sale with an old 8mm for sale i'll buy it and try to recreate the effects when im bored.

Still interesting though.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 09:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by solongandgoodnight

Originally posted by GiodanoBruno

Originally posted by kauskau

Originally posted by sheeplearepeople
reply to post by kauskau
 





the strange thing for me that people can not distinguish anymore between lying and acting..of course there are good actors but in this documentary there is no liar. Do you see one? Do you have a scene where you feel that someone is lying?



There's a third category that you haven't considered. Someone who is delusional isn't lying or acting. They truly believe something that is false.


of course. But in this case we have video material and a first class ufo sighting...


Can you even prove this UFO is an actual flying object?

No you can't.

...Like how I told the others , there is only one way to have definitive proof and it not by having videos,photos or eyewitness accounts; its having a massive ufo parked above time square still for on whole month. That's proof


And a bit of advice , chill out with the title next time. Being impulsive makes one look stupid.

a classic example of, "i wouldn't believe it if nailed me right between the eyes because i can't handle what i'm seeing" kind of guy. you shouldn't act so defensive, it make one look afraid.



You are so right,, the nail your speaking of are these 4 magic videos.... Of course! How dumb of me.

Fool



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 09:46 AM
link   
reply to post by kauskau
 


" of course. But in this case we have video material and a first class ufo sighting..."

Google "1984 Olympic Alien" that must be a first class sighting X 100,000.

Look at the faces in the crowd!



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by GiodanoBruno
 


"World leading experts?????????????????????

And who are they " Everyone but the people that don't believe this POORLY done hoax, i.e. you, me, and a few others on this thread.



posted on Jun, 14 2012 @ 10:50 AM
link   
"The researchers return to the States..."

*Shot of driving across the Burrard Street Bridge with the Molson Brewies in the background*

Wait, what?




top topics



 
63
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join