It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by borntowatch
I have seen no evidence to refute, none.
Evidence of common descent of living things has been discovered by scientists working in a variety of fields over many years. This evidence has demonstrated and verified the occurrence of evolution and provided a wealth of information on the natural processes by which the variety and diversity of life on Earth developed. This evidence supports the modern evolutionary synthesis, the current scientific theory that explains how and why life changes over time. Evolutionary biologists document the fact of common descent: making testable predictions, testing hypotheses, and developing theories that illustrate and describe its causes.
Originally posted by borntowatch
Come on fella step up and convert this Christian to stupidity
Originally posted by Julio
This goes both ways;
In an evolution vs creation debate, have you managed to open the other person's mind?
Or have you ever converted (hate that word) someone?
The reason I ask this is because I see countless threads debating the same thing, whether it's on Facebook, Youtube, ATS, or random forums, and I never actually see someone question themselves.
(the following is just personal experience with the matter so feel free to skip past it, it's not that important )
~~~
I am an atheist. About two years ago, me and my ex were having a debate about evolution vs creation. I was very surprised that she didn't understand the basic concept of what evolution was, and as I explained it to her, she began to question what she's believed in all her life. Last time I talked to her (around 6 months ago), she was still unsure what she believed in, having come from a born-again christian family.
Like I said, I am an atheist. I have never believed in any sort of god. The entire idea of it seems incredibly silly. However, sometimes when I read stories about ghostly encounters I really start to wonder. Millions of ghostly experiences have to mean something, right? Not everyone can simply be putting on hoaxes. Religious people call ghosts demons, and it actually creeps me out. I also get the heebie jeebies when I walk by a church. What bugs me is I don't believe it, yet it still is creepy.
~~~
Slightly unrelated, but what does is mean when people say they have a relationship with God? People will sometimes say they talk to God and God talks back. Please, no half-assed "it's an experience you can't explain, man", just give me the straight facts. I am legitimately curious, and I won't make fun of you. I get very frustrated when I ask a religious person what seems to be a simple question and they quote something out of the big B or speak in riddles.
"junk science"
"fairy tale evolution"
What part of evolution do you believe to be junk science? I am not being hostile, this is a sincere question.
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
First we must define what the word evolution means in the context of origins.
There are six stages of evolution in the belief system of the evolutionist. ( Belief and Faith are interchangeable requiring the same energy to fulfill. )
Cosmic evolution: the origin of time, space, and matter from nothing in the “big bang”
If you do not believe this is there or your belief look it up, but just as I believe a super natural creator did it all you must believe that a nothing did it all and since no one was there we both are believing on faith so origins is a religion.
Chemical evolution: all elements “evolved” from hydrogen
Just as origins with nothing as the hero hydrogen some how creates all the know elements, and let it be said they have never done it in a lab past iron. So once again belief in something that can not be proved.
And elements decaying into something else is the opposite of evolution.
Stellar evolution: stars and planets formed from gas clouds
In all the recorded history of star gazing new stars have never been documented only the lose.
Organic evolution: life begins from inanimate matter
Trillions of dollars have been spent only to discover life comes from life.
Macro-evolution: animals and plants change from one type into another
No one has ever seen one type of animal give birth to another. Dogs always birth dogs.
And dead bones do not prove evolution;
Micro-evolution: variations form within the “kind”
This one both the creationist and evolutionist agree upon
You can breed dogs big to small but never out side there range.
This is the one that evolutionist use to prove all the rest as true.
There for evolution is a junk science.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
nor will you be convincing any atheist of religion.
Originally posted by gentledissident
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
nor will you be convincing any atheist of religion.
If you beat them over the head enough and hypnotize them when they're down, poor, drugged out, lonely, frightened, and desperate....
You might get somewhere.
Picard later admits he saw 5 lights.edit on 14-6-2012 by gentledissident because: wrong video lol
Originally posted by WhoTehCapFit
reply to post by rhinoceros
You're right, because that is a chemical formula not a structural formula..
Originally posted by WhoTehCapFit
reply to post by rhinoceros
More than one way to write a formula to convey the information of what makes DNA not "THE" DNA, its a "coincidence" then if youd like.. and they do have lines.
Originally posted by SerialKiller
Normal people question their beliefs constantly