Texas Dad Catches Man Raping His Daughter, Kills Him... did he go to far????, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 12-6-2012 @ 10:19 PM by ripcontrol
Texas dad kills rapist


(CNN) -- A Texas father caught a man sexually assaulting his 4-year-old daughter and punched him in the head repeatedly, killing him, authorities said.




Lavaca County Precinct Judge Alene Lyons, who is coordinating information in the case including autopsy results, said Monday that a preliminary autopsy report indicated the victim "died from blunt-force head and neck injuries."




What got me however, was some of the responses that have been coming out

He went to far some people where saying on the radio


No offense to the people that are naive, but the man got what he deserved.

The father caught the man in the act.


reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:22 PM by ripcontrol
reply to post by ripcontrol







forgot to add the father was NOT arrested....


It is in front of a grand jury
edit on 12-6-2012 by ripcontrol because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:25 PM by Avalessa
reply to post by Avalessa



But in response: no. When someone lays their hands on the innocent with intentions to corrupt, it is acceptable and applauded to defend the innocent at all costs.


reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:27 PM by ripcontrol
reply to post by HiHoAZaway



I agree

good luck finding a jury if they decide to prosecute

abc 13
abclocal.go.com...


reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:28 PM by ripcontrol
reply to post by Agarta



mods go ahead and shut mine down... i ran a search and nothing came up




reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:42 PM by tinfoilman
Originally posted by ripcontrol
Texas dad kills rapist


Doesn't matter if he did which I don't think he did. It's unfair to require the same level of logical thinking from a person that's in the heat of the moment and only has seconds to react as that of someone who had a week to think about it.

The key word being react. A person should act logically, but if you force them into a position where they have to REACT to what you're doing, you're not giving them the chance to think logically. You're are acting irresponsibly. When you act irresponsibly you can get hurt. That's what happened here.
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 10:54 PM by g146541
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Originally posted by ripcontrol
Texas dad kills rapist


Doesn't matter if he did which I don't think he did. It's unfair to require the same level of logical thinking from a person that's in the heat of the moment and only has seconds to react as that of someone who had a week to think about it.

The key word being react. A person should act logically, but if you force them into a position where they have to REACT to what you're doing, you're not giving them the chance to think logically. You're are acting irresponsibly. When you act irresponsibly you can get hurt. That's what happened here.
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)

Logical response applies to you as well.
If this father cannot act logically, then he must be caged with the rest of the instinctive animals.
Otherwise, we are not a free and just society.
Why could the father not just beat the hell out of said person and let him have his day in court.
If you need someone rubbed out in prison, it is not a hard thing to do.
Or, you could wait for the person to get let out.
Either way, cool heads always prevail.


reply posted on 12-6-2012 @ 11:30 PM by tinfoilman
reply to post by g146541



Well first there's no law that we cage people just because they don't think logically. It's not illegal to act illogically. We only cage a few of the animals. Acting like an illogical animal is no reason to cage someone. Or else we've have a lot more animals to be caging don't you think?

Also, the father can act logically. But he wasn't given the chance to act. He was only give a chance to react which is something entirely different. Rape can lead to death and the law recognizes that you can act in self defense for another to protect their life.

If the rapist doesn't like it and he wanted the father to act more logically he simply should have called ahead and let the father know what he was planning to do. That would have given the father a chance to think about it logically and come up with the right answer. But since he didn't do that, he got hurt. It's just one of those things. It's not really anyone's fault. Except the rapist's of course.
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-6-2012 @ 01:23 AM by g146541
Originally posted by tinfoilman
reply to
post by g146541



Well first there's no law that we cage people just because they don't think logically. It's not illegal to act illogically. We only cage a few of the animals. Acting like an illogical animal is no reason to cage someone. Or else we've have a lot more animals to be caging don't you think?

Also, the father can act logically. But he wasn't given the chance to act. He was only give a chance to react which is something entirely different. Rape can lead to death and the law recognizes that you can act in self defense for another to protect their life.

If the rapist doesn't like it and he wanted the father to act more logically he simply should have called ahead and let the father know what he was planning to do. That would have given the father a chance to think about it logically and come up with the right answer. But since he didn't do that, he got hurt. It's just one of those things. It's not really anyone's fault. Except the rapist's of course.
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)

So, if you go to a buddies house and rough house around and he accidentally kills you, you will be comfortable with him screaming, "PEDOPHILE" to keep himself out of jail?
I will keep note of this if you or one of your kids are ever at my home for a bbq.
Hope it helps


reply posted on 13-6-2012 @ 01:35 AM by tinfoilman
Originally posted by g146541
Originally posted by tinfoilman
reply to
post by g146541



Well first there's no law that we cage people just because they don't think logically. It's not illegal to act illogically. We only cage a few of the animals. Acting like an illogical animal is no reason to cage someone. Or else we've have a lot more animals to be caging don't you think?

Also, the father can act logically. But he wasn't given the chance to act. He was only give a chance to react which is something entirely different. Rape can lead to death and the law recognizes that you can act in self defense for another to protect their life.

If the rapist doesn't like it and he wanted the father to act more logically he simply should have called ahead and let the father know what he was planning to do. That would have given the father a chance to think about it logically and come up with the right answer. But since he didn't do that, he got hurt. It's just one of those things. It's not really anyone's fault. Except the rapist's of course.
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)

So, if you go to a buddies house and rough house around and he accidentally kills you, you will be comfortable with him screaming, "PEDOPHILE" to keep himself out of jail?
I will keep note of this if you or one of your kids are ever at my home for a bbq.
Hope it helps


Lol that's the dumbest argument ever. If my friend accidentally kills me he shouldn't have to scream PEDOPHILE to stay out of jail in the first place. I wouldn't want him to go to jail if it was an accident.

I wouldn't want to be killed, but if it's an accident, what possible point would it serve to put him in jail and ruin his life too? That's just a vengeful way of thinking.

It's not going to bring me back? He didn't mean to do it so therefore he's unlikely to do it again. Sometimes accidents just happen. A person shouldn't be severely punished for something they didn't even mean to do. It was just an accident.

The whole point of punishment is to prevent someone from wanting to do it again. If it was an accident then punishment serves no purpose whatsoever because he didn't WANT to do it in the first place. He was trying not to lol. You could punish him for 1,000 years and end up with exactly what you started off with. A guy that never wanted to do it in the first place. You've made absolutely no progress.

Man, did your mom electroshock you every time you spilled the milk or something? She probably shouldn't have done that. Let the revenge go yo. Eye for an eye everyone goes blind yo.
edit on 13-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags