It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by neo96
Still less than 100+ the USA has under its belt...
USA = fact proven warmonger.
Now what do you think of the nuclear powered submarine and secondly:
You have not told me how many US bases are surrounding Iran and how man Iranian bases are surrounding the USA.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Also what is your opinion on Iran and its plans for a nuclear powered submarine?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Another piece of scrap metal in the eyes of the Iranians.
Another piece of scrap metal in the eyes of the Iranians. This is ridiculous, in the past two weeks we have seen an amazing show of force which is nothing more than intimidation. Nothing but plain bullying.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
That quote was talking about when the Westminster was threatening Iran and if they attacked, Iran had a right to self defend itself and sink the ship. Was the HMS Westminster interfering in middle eastern affairs and showing off force and threatening Iran? Hell yes it was and if the HMS Westminster attacked Iran they have every right to sink that scrap
The HMS was simply sailing to the region. Not threatening Iran. You ignorantly bolted out from under your rock and spewed your ignorance all over your keyboard. Deal with it.
Maybe the warmonger's are finally going to get what they have been hoping for. Looks to be kicking off after all.
war monger Iran
things nuclear and their war machine a submarine who has only one purpose. War!
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
It is a warship in middle eastern waters at the time when the Iran situation was very heated and it was a threat plain and simple.
Then again by your flawed logic...
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
I clearly stated that it was show of force and threat by the HMS Westminster and that if they attacked the Iranians had a right to sink it in self defense. I did not advocate a first strike by iran and never have.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Another piece of scrap metal in the eyes of the Iranians. This is ridiculous, in the past two weeks we have seen an amazing show of force which is nothing more than intimidation. Nothing but plain bullying.
Russia is saying dont mess with Iran, if iran gets invaded it couuld go nuclear. If the US loses a carrier, it was fair game. If the US tries to destroy irans mainland expect DC to get nuked and NYC. Do you think it is worth having NYC and DC nuked over irans supposed nuclear weapons?
Also if the US navy attacked iran, of course Iran would take them out. Do you really expect Iran to idly sit by and take a beating by the US Navy? Of course Iran would think it is worth it if the US attacks them.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SLAYER69
It was implied because of the intimidation and show of force.
Then why did you not call me on it at that time?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Another piece of scrap metal in the eyes of the Iranians.
This is ridiculous
You took the words right out of my mouth.