Iran Plans Nuclear-Powered Sub

reply to post by neo96

Iran the warmonger!

OF COURSE Iran is a warmonger!

They’re 12’ers….. Xtreme Religious Zealots!!

That won’t dissuade the shills though. I want them to define the GOODNESS in Iran; in Islam.

I’ll wait!

Yeah i wanna know how peaceful this 12th Imam dude is that both the Ayatollah and Ahkmadenjhihad have both said they have met LOL

reply to post by seabag

OF COURSE Iran is a warmonger!

How many countries as iran actually attacked in the past 100 years?

How many countries hs the USA actually attacked in the past 100 years?

They’re 12’ers….. Xtreme Religious Zealots!!

Like we in the USA do not have religious influence in our politics.

Plus Defense contractors and corporations are runnig our government and they want war much more than religious folks.

USA worships money = Religion of US government

That won’t dissuade the shills though. I want them to define the GOODNESS in Iran; in Islam. I’ll wait!

Shill? LMAO, speak for yourself

How about you define the Goodness in USA? In Christianity.ILL WAIT!!

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

The whole world is wrong in this instance. Anytime the USA convinces a country to disarm itself, it is easy attack for them. How about you give up your guns?

In YOUR OPINION!

The US disarmed Japan and Germany. Did US attack them??

Why do you want them to give up their weapons? So you can attack them?

No it would motivate NATO TO ATTACK THEM since they would be unarmed.

They don’t HAVE WEAPONS according to YOU!!

You try to play both sides, dude! You argue that they don’t have weapons yet you tell me that US wants to take away their weapons so US can attack them!

Which is it??

LMAO, USA is right? That is your ignorant and incorrect method of analysis.

Just the truth!

What is your evidence that the USA is right? What you waved your flag around?

Many Independent countries around the globe owe their independence to US of A. Don’t make me list them all and show your ignorance! Start with the majority of US trading partners.

reply to post by seabag

In YOUR OPINION! The US disarmed Japan and Germany. Did US attack them??

That was after WW2. Not before or during. USA has not been to war with Iran yet. If that happens and the USA wins, then they can demand disarming as they are the victors, but not before so they can attack easily.

They don’t HAVE WEAPONS according to YOU!!

No they do not have any nuclear weapons but you do not want them to have a nuclear powered sub and I am telling why why they have a perfect right to develop the sub and nuclear weapons, neither of which they have.

Just the truth!

Provide the evidence

------------------------------------

You conveniently ignored this part of the post:

Why do you want them to give up their weapons? So you can attack them?

It would motivate NATO TO ATTACK THEM since they would be unarmed

1 - US bases are surrounding Iran.

2 - NATO has a history of attacking countries in the Middle east

3 - Iran is another Middle eastern country.

Lets do the math. NATO bases around Iran, Iran is a middle eastern country, NATO has history of attacking Middle eastern countries, NATO telling Iran to give up its self defense weapons or stop from developing any....

Yea Iran wants to attack someone...Lame...its is self defense

Look at history for past 100 years.

how many countries has Iran attacked? How many has USA-NATO attacked?

What is your evidence that the USA is right? What you waved your flag around? Many Independent countries around the globe owe their independence to US of A. Don’t make me list them all and show your ignorance! Start with the majority of US trading partners.

How is the USA right in demanding Iran not to develop nuclear weapons or nuclear powered submarines?

We in the USA have both. What right does the USA have to tell them?

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
1 - US bases are surrounding Iran.

2 - NATO has a history of attacking countries in the Middle east

3 - Iran is another Middle eastern country.

4 - Iran should quit while they're ahead...

reply to post by SLAYER69


5 - USA should quit attacking Middle eastern countries and iran would not have to worry about defending itself from US imperialism

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL


Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

How many countries as iran actually attacked in the past 100 years?

How many has it been capable of defeating?

How many countries hs the USA actually attacked in the past 100 years?

As many as US needed…

Like we in the USA do not have religious influence in our politics.

US is not a theocracy….Iran most certainly is.

Try again!

Plus Defense contractors and corporations are runnig our government and they want war much more than religious folks.

I agree with you on this point.

USA worships money = Religion of US government

Iran/Syria/Russia/China worship = US traitor (if you’re even a citizen…I have my doubts)

Shill? LMAO, speak for yourself

How about you define the Goodness in USA? In Christianity.ILL WAIT!!

It’s written in history…I don’t need to define it for you.

reply to post by SLAYER69

Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.

How about the USA stop funding and supplying weapons to any and everyone, pot meet kettle.

Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

 

Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.

Indeed and:

www.presstv.ir...

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.

How about the USA stop funding and supplying weapons to any and everyone, pot meet kettle.

Maybe when Russia and China and Turkey, and Saudi, and Kuwait and everyone else does

Yeah pot meet kettle.

reply to post by seabag

How many countries as iran actually attacked in the past 100 years? How many has it been capable of defeating?

Answer the question instead of diverting. Just because it is easy to attack a country does not mean we should.

What does that make the USA? A bully

How many countries hs the USA actually attacked in the past 100 years? As many as US needed…

Answer the question. I will repeat it again. How many countries has the USA attacked in the past 100 years

Like we in the USA do not have religious influence in our politics. US is not a theocracy….Iran most certainly is. Try again!

Just because it is not a theocracy does not mean religious influence.

Secondly money of defense contractors and corporations are the religion of the USA, it is what drives the government

Iran/Syria/Russia/China worship = US traitor (if you’re even a citizen…I have my doubts)

LMAO, and now we go and attack my citizenship..whats next, your mamma jokes..

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

USA has not been to war with Iran yet. If that happens and the USA wins, then they can demand disarming as they are the victors, but not before so they can attack easily.

The world demands it….not the US.

No they do not have any nuclear weapons but you do not want them to have a nuclear powered sub and I am telling why why they have a perfect right to develop the sub and nuclear weapons, neither of which they have.

And I’m telling you Iran has proven itself untrustworthy by violating the NPT!!!!

Why do you want them to give up their weapons? So you can attack them?

Because they will use them! Likely against Israel and other US allies….and US if they can deliver it.

How is the USA right in demanding Iran not to develop nuclear weapons or nuclear powered submarines?

We in the USA have both. What right does the USA have to tell them?

Because we won! Because no country can tell us otherwise…that’s why!

reply to post by neo96


You never answered my question of when you accused Iran of being a warmonger:

How many countries has the USA attacked over the past 100 years? Iran?

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by neo96

 

You never answered my question of when you accused Iran of being a warmonger:

How many countries has the USA attacked over the past 100 years? Iran?

Keep waiting since that is not the topic Iran and their war machine is.

Isreal via hamas and hezzbollah and The US while in Iraq

reply to post by seabag

The world demands it….not the US.

The world demanded the same of iraq and libya, and then NATO took the greenlight for attack.

And I’m telling you Iran has proven itself untrustworthy by violating the NPT!!!!

Then they should withdraw from the NPT

Like we have a history of following the rules.

How many rules have we violated in past wars?

Geneva convention anyone....?

Why do you want them to give up their weapons? So you can attack them? Because they will use them! Likely against Israel and other US allies….and US if they can deliver it.

They are for self defense. USA has a history of attacking middle eastern countries and iran needs them for self defense.

Do you have 100% proof that they will use them?

Because we won! Because no country can tell us otherwise…that’s why!

USA did not go to war and win with Iran.

I will ask you again:

How is the USA right in demanding Iran not to develop nuclear weapons or nuclear powered submarines?

We in the USA have both. What right does the USA have to tell them?

reply to post by neo96

Keep waiting since that is not the topic Iran and their war machine is.

Isreal via hamas and hezzbollah and The US while in Iraq

You really think in the past 100 years USA only intervened in Iraq? LMAO

False, you keep diverting the topic again.

It is very relevant to the topic because the USA is leading the charge on Iran to not develop nuclear weapons.

You say they are a warmonger, and now I am gonna keep asking you who is the actual warmonger:

How many countries has the USA attacked in the past 100 years vs Irans military interventions.

Originally posted by neo96

Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

 

Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.

Indeed and:

www.presstv.ir...

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
The world demanded the same of iraq and libya, and then NATO took the greenlight for attack.

NATO did Libya...

The US and a coalition did Iraq.

The majority of Iran's neighbors don't want them to have Nukes. If Iran so much as farts wrong they'll know how General Custer felt.