It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Germanicus
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by Germanicus
Who did we steal it off? the Argies? heck they didn't even exist when we found it and started living there.
You stole it from the indiginous people. It was only a very small group. But still. Kinda like Australia and new Zealand and places like that. Pacific islands..... The English would sail around and if there was no commerce happening,they would consider it unclaimed land and make it a colony. English Imperialism.
Now England is part of the American Empire. American Imperialism is at play. Argentina are on the outer of the Empire. England is part of the inner circle. I have a problem with England thinking they can suck oil from a part of the world that is not anywhere near them.
If the English Government does not want the oil and will allow the tiny population of the Islands get the entire profits from the oil, which will make them the wealthiest of people per capita I would say, then fine. But we all know England wants to suck resources. Suck profits.
Who cares about the Imperial foothold? China knows it is there. WW3 will be a different style of war. The military foothold will not matter,and China will win. After that,England will not waste money sending its military to holiday there.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Germanicus
Who did we steal it off?
There was no-one living there...it was uninhabited.
And Argentina didn't even exist....and when it did they were far too busy killing the native people of the mainland to even bother themselves with a barren piece of rock that only Brits were really interested in living on.
Argentina didn't give a toss about the place until rumours of oil began to circulate.
In 1833 the British colonial power invaded Las Mavinas, and what happen afterwards is now called “ethnic cleansing” – hundreds of English settlers were artificially introduced while all Argentineans were expelled.
I am pleased, to be honest. I have also read this today. What was especially interesting (to me) was that Kirchner will be addressing the UN De-Colonisation conference, she will in turn be addressed by a group of young Falklanders...........me thinks after the rhetoric she is sure to spout she will be left looking rather silly after the youngsters get their chance to speak.
A group of young Falkland Islanders hope to present Argentine president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner with a firm message at the UN in New York that they want to remain British subjects and continue their current way of life.
James Marsh, 31, a delegate who works for the Falklands government, said: "We are sixth and seventh generation Falkland Islanders, our families forged a life in the Falklands when times were much less easy than they are now. "It is an insult to those people that their endeavours, the 150 years we have been in the Falklands, are not recognised by the Argentine politicians." He added: "I think the most important thing we can tell them is we are a vibrant, young, self-sufficient community who just want to be left in peace to forge our own future."
You're obviously making things up
In 1833 the British colonial power invaded Las Mavinas, and what happen afterwards is now called “ethnic cleansing” – hundreds of English settlers were artificially introduced while all Argentineans were expelled.
Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Flavian
sure yet the queen gets to party while the peasants suffer austerity.Your constitution has been dumped into the hole by the rothschilds and monarchy.
Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Flavian
sure yet the queen gets to party while the peasants suffer austerity.Your constitution has been dumped into the hole by the rothschilds and monarchy.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by Germanicus
So by your reckoning the US should give back the whole of the US back to the natives? the Australians should give the whole of the Australia back to the Aborigines?.
Like someone said before it's about who lives there now, many generations of people who want to remain under British sovereignty live on the Falklands so you can bleet all you want about us nasty Brits and we will keep our Island which are called the Falklands.