It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This video explains a basic overview of the Civil Rights (Voting Rights/Election Fraud) Lawsuit being filed in Federal Court by Lawyers For Ron Paul on behalf of American voters.
Originally posted by RisenAngel77
Im surprised this didn't get more attention oO,Where is everyone?
2nd lineedit on 12-6-2012 by RisenAngel77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
Sounds like something I'd vote no on because it doesn't go far enough.
Title I did not eliminate literacy tests, which were one of the main methods used to exclude Black voters, other racial minorities, and poor Whites in the South, nor did it address economic retaliation, police repression, or physical violence against nonwhite voters. While the Act did require that voting rules and procedures be applied equally to all races, it did not abolish the concept of voter "qualification", that is to say, it accepted the idea that citizens do not have an automatic right to vote but rather might have to meet some standard beyond citizenship.[32][33] It was the Voting Rights Act, enacted one year later in 1965, that directly addressed and eliminated most voting qualifications beyond citizenship.
Wait, more government? Here. Even though I am for equal rights, I'm not so sure I'm for yet another freaking committee taking taxpayer money. I'd probably vote no over this.
Title V Expanded the Civil Rights Commission established by the earlier Civil Rights Act of 1957 with additional powers, rules and procedures.
Originally posted by Sek82
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
If you listened to first 15 seconds of the video or even look at the screen you'd see that they are a "community of independent grassroots legal activists, comprised of lawyers, paralegals and concerned citizens." No mention of his involvement specifically.
Another post and run by the resident Paul hating verbal contortionist.
Lawyers for Ron Paul
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
Originally posted by Malynn
Originally posted by RisenAngel77
Im surprised this didn't get more attention oO,Where is everyone?
2nd lineedit on 12-6-2012 by RisenAngel77 because: (no reason given)
I think people are really kind of sad about the whole Ron Paul thing in general. It's hard and depressing for me to go into any Ron Paul threads these days.