It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agarta
My theory is that the Universe collapses into itself and explodes out the opposite way.Matter vrs. Antimatter. Picture, if you will, the sphere of the universe being sucked into its center. Instead of the explosion spreading into this physical realm it explodes into its opposite. Then it is sucked back to its center and explodes back into this one. The cycle continues back and forth. If my theory is correct than what they are getting images of would be 2 Universes ago.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Penrose is credible.
I wonder if this could mean the universe cycles between expansion and collapse.
Originally posted by EvanB
Hasn't physics already ruled out a "big crunch"?
The further galaxies are speeding up, not slowing down to coalesce again...
I think, according to current knowledge.. That the universe will just continue to expand, and die of heat death..
that would make sense considering, the multiverse is supposedly expanding so somehow somewhere there has to the equal and opposite reaction.... contraction.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Penrose is credible.
I wonder if this could mean the universe cycles between expansion and collapse.
Originally posted by PerfectAnomoly
Originally posted by EvanB
Hasn't physics already ruled out a "big crunch"?
The further galaxies are speeding up, not slowing down to coalesce again...
I think, according to current knowledge.. That the universe will just continue to expand, and die of heat death..
I was very much under the impression that the speed at which other galaxies are moving away from our own was decreasing, thus ultimately and logically ending in a "crunch" so to speak...
You can see two guys standing in the center circle. One is facing us and the other is facing away. You can make out the face of the one facing us.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
I have read some of Roger penroses work and I find him very credible, this is amazing and could show that our universe could have been reborn etc.
Even if this is true there is always a beginning for our universe and this may be just one step of part of our universe as it cycles from its actual origin.
The big bang may be the origin in our cycle, but not the original origin of our universe
God is fantastic and lets all thank him for the universe he gave us
[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2157548/Is-secret-previous-universe-hidden-microwaves-Scientist-spots-ghost-Big-Bang.html[/url]
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 093030p://6America/ChicagoMon, 11 Jun 2012 21:10:03 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Does this picture show the 'ghost' of a universe that existed before big bang
www.dail ymail.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
A renowned scientist says he has spotted evidence that a universe existed before the Big Bang.
Professor Roger Penrose from Oxford University says concentric circles discovered in the background microwaves of the universe provides evidence of events that took place before the universe came into being.
The cosmic microwave offers us a ghostly look at the the universe just 300,000 years after the Big Ban' - a microscopic amount of time compared to the universe's estimated age of 13.7billion year
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...