It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
by Mary Elizabeth Williams, Salon
Posted on June 11, 2012
So you’re an organization that “builds character and trains [young people] in the responsibilities of participating citizenship.” Naturally, that means you practice institutionalized discrimination. Maybe it’s time to rethink a few things, Boy Scouts of America.
That the Boy Scouts refuse to offer membership to LGBT individuals is nothing new – they’ve been expressly prohibited from participating in the Scouts for over 20 years, on the grounds that “homosexual conduct is inconsistent with those values” the group wishes to instill. Since then, the right of the Scouts to be exclusionary has been thrashed about, tested and challenged, always unsuccessfully.
www.alternet.org...
Originally posted by petrus4
The one thing I'm curious about, is what human society is going to look like, if the gay community does achieve all of its' goals.
I'm not making any predictions there, either. I'm genuinely interested to find out, because when it happens, then we will have definitive proof about who has been correct, with regards to homosexuality; the people who think that it is harmless, and it should simply be the case that homosexuals are able to do everything that heterosexuals can do, or the people who think that there is a global, Marxist conspiracy to destroy first human society, and then humanity itself, and that homosexual advocacy is a fundamental element of that.
Time will tell.
Originally posted by alfa1
Its a privately run organisation, they can have whatever rules they like.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
That's the funniest thing I've read all month.
Originally posted by petrus4
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
That's the funniest thing I've read all month.
Paternalistic contempt is not going to earn you any credibility at all. What it will do, on the other hand, is add yet another example of a consistent observation that I've made on this forum. Namely, that advocates of homosexuality are incapable of responding rationally to dissenting opinions, but instead are unable to resist the urge to indulge in various forms of mockery and ad hominem, which are fueled by unrestrained, negative emotions, rather than logic.
If I'm wrong, you will find that you can silence me far more effectively, by employing legitimate rational argument.
Originally posted by wiser3
What I do find strange is that most of the "Gay" threads on ATS are started by straight people who usually blame the gays of being "in your face"!
Gays, smokers and fat people. The 3 groups that can openly be discriminated against.