It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
I actually doubt that part of the story, to be honest. And it might be a bit dishonest, but it's still not theft.
Thanks for answering. It's nice to know that if I accidentally leave my wallet at the juice bar, you have no problem sorting through it, taking whatever contents as your own and telling yourself you didn't steal it, because I obviously didn't want it because I left it there. Amazing!
Even if these horrible 12 year olds were just waiting for him to walk away without his cash, he still walked away and left it there. That is a sign that it was unwanted.
And you believe that twisted logic? The $20 was "unwanted", since the man got it out of his bank account and left it in the machine, he "didn't really want it". :shk:
So I've answered your question, now please answer mine. Have you ever "stolen" change from a change slot?
This thread isn't about taking change out of a change slot. I have seen many threads on that idea, though.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by TinkerHaus
the lack of logic, responsibility and basic couth in the responses to this story simply amazes me.
this statement says a lot.
When you ABANDON something, you no longer own it. When you leave your change in the machine you are ABANDONING it.
and here's a question for you ... if abandoning something means you no longer own it, then why does every commercial location feature a "lost and found" ????
so, if i leave/forget my sunglasses at dinner, they are no longer mine ??
if i forget a child (any child) in a public bathroom, they are no longer my responsibility ??
if i leave an extra $5 at the Sunpass station (toll booth) for the next 5 cars and you are next in line, do you think you have a right to "claim" my $4 change/pre-paid fee for the next 4 cars ?? i did abandon it, right ??
gooooolllly, you folks sure make me less interested in being a "good" person.
Originally posted by roadgravel
Interesting how people seem to create their own version of law. A person has the right but not the obligation to give up their claim.
A landowner has superior claim over a find made within the non-public areas of his property, so if a customer finds lost property in the public area of a store, the customer has superior claim to the lost property over that of the store-owner, but if the customer finds the lost property in the non-public area of that store, such as an area marked "Employees Only," the store-owner will have superior claim, as the customer was trespassing when he found it
Under common law principles, the finder of a misplaced object has a duty to turn it over to the owner of the premises, on the theory that the true owner is likely to return to that location to search for his misplaced item. If the true owner does not return within a reasonable time (which varies considerably depending on the circumstances), the property becomes that of the owner of the premises
Originally posted by roadgravel
reply to post by TinkerHaus
In typical ATS fashion, you ignored part of the material.
Under common law principles, the finder of a misplaced object has a duty to turn it over to the owner of the premises, on the theory that the true owner is likely to return to that location to search for his misplaced item. If the true owner does not return within a reasonable time (which varies considerably depending on the circumstances), the property becomes that of the owner of the premises
Then there was the part you quoted is showing that when unclaimed the finder, not the store, gets ownership. Doesn't mean the rightful owner cannot claim it.
This seems to be mislaid, not lost property...
edit on 6/11/2012 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)
If you leave your child somewhere (abandon them) then yes, you deserve to lose your child.
without asking those around if it was theirs, first ?? nope, never.
Have you ever taken a quarter you found in an arcade machine? Or in a phone booth?
nope, don't use car washes.
Or on the ground at the carwash?
nice try but that wouldn't apply to me.
If you have you are guilty of EXACTLY what you are complaining about.
in this case, the "finder" was 2, 12yr old, traveling alone & unsupervised, girls.
the finder of a misplaced object has a duty to turn it over to the owner of the premises
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by TinkerHaus
whether you believe me or not is irrelevant, you asked, i answered honestly.
i comprehend your illogical excuses just fine, i happen to disagree with you.
guess what ?? children who lived through the 70s, often share similar stories cause we know what's it's like to be without, your generation ?? not so much.
we understand how important that dime or quarter may be and besides, it didn't belong to us hence it's not a common belief to keep it.
you are still avoiding the question, you dance well but answer the dang thing.
why do commercial establishments bother to have "lost and found" if what is found automatically belongs to someone else ?
i didn't attack your kids, don't make the mistake of attacking mine
actually, if the store re-stocked your "cold" items, that is standard practice.
IF you kept your receipt, you could have re-claimed them
(even if someone else walked off with them)
this, i've done myself.
many grocery stores have security cams in the parking lot too.
if you let it drop there, that was your decision, it could have had a different outcome.