It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by protocolsoflove
Despicable. Give some globalists in Geneva your baby so they can send it to a SRA dungeon.
Originally posted by The Sword
Oh there's nothing wrong with them in theory.
I just fail to see a conservative could approve of baby boxes and yet, disapprove of the "nanny state" that insists on paying and taking care of them.
Originally posted by Domo1
It seems so ridiculous that it's almost funny, but actually highlights a real tragedy.
I suppose you can't really call someone who has an unwanted pregnancy and wishes to get rid of the child via dumping 'responsible', but perhaps we could ensure that when handing over a child it is actually given to someone face to face, even if anonymously.
I'm not judging people that feel ill equipped to deal with the responsibility of having a child. I certainly don't feel responsible enough to manage it. It's amazing me and my dog are fed and bathed regularly . That being said, how could you put a baby in a box? What about medical issues in the child? Do you just leave a note? What if the alarm system were to fail and the little one sits there for too long? What if the little one starts choking before someone can get to it?
Originally posted by CosmicEgg
reply to post by intrptr
Why do you insist on blaming the mother? Any number of variables exist that prevent a person from raising a child. She may be making the most superhuman sacrifice ever performed by a human being by giving that child up.
Maybe you should look in the mirror before using such descriptors.