It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Furbs
This will be harder to do that you realize, because most of what is being done here is a logical fallacy known as Begging the Question.
Example. The illuminati exist because their symbols are in music videos! How do you know they are Illuminati symbols? Because they are Illuminati symbols!
.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Furbs
Hello. This is one I've been saying. What I believe were obvious references to the Nephilim. It was so obvious it leaped out at me. I AM AGREEING WITH YOU, wholeheartedly.
replying to 'offhumandescent'
I was being sarcastic. I was a little offended by the other poster (Trafalgar1805) and his repeated negative references to homosexuality. I thought the sarcasm was obvious. I'll stay on topic.
...
Just to be fair to the OP, I don't think he interprets the hoops to be a reference to the Olympics. I could be wrong, but I've seen several posts he made where he indicated that he thought the rings, were symbolizing some kind of Astral Path or something (sorry I don't remember exactly what he said)
I just wanted to throw out something else.
Two intersecting circles, the part that intersects, is a huge Satanic symbol.
Also, watching the video again, it seemed that at one part in the video she was doing something with the rings that reminded me of something that is called the merkaba, which is transforming your body literally into a vehicle that can 'go places no one else can go'
Sorry for falling for the off topic bait, and going off topic myself. I was being sarcastic and it was a reaction to the other poster, but I'm over it now.
reply to Adama
Adama, I'm not trying to derail this thread. I apologize for getting offended by the remarks of Trafalgar1805. His remarks were offensive.
I have stated many times now that I saw many occult symbols in the video, and have agreed with the OP with most of his observations.
Sometimes I get a bit sarcastic, but I think (or thought) it was obvious when I was. But I do take the thread seriously or I wouldn't be participating, and I am not a dis-info agent. I happen to be gay, so I think it's understandable that Trafalgar1805 remarks were offensive to me.
Reply to Loakin
Thanks for the tip. You're right. I am new here, and I did notice my multiple posts, because I was responding to each person that I felt compelled to reply to, so I will try to condense my responses into one post.
reply to adama:
I went back and tried to delete or edit the post. It won't let me. I'm not trying to offend anyone. I am gay, and I was offended by the repeated remarks of Trafalgar1805 and I was responding with sarcasm.
REBEL V
edit on 16-6-2012 by rebelv because: trying to condense my postsedit on 16-6-2012 by rebelv because: acuracy.
Originally posted by rebelv
Originally posted by Adama
reply to post by nunya13
He keeps coming back because he is a dis-info agent, one of many I've identified. The boys at the top are probably watching this thread with great interest, and if enough people spread the word, the Illuminati will have to cancel the event. That's why all these people like ofhumandescent, furbs, and rebelv are trying to derail this thread, and discredit any serious inquiry.
Adama, I'm not trying to derail this thread. I apologize for getting offended by the remarks of offhumandescent. His remarks were offensive.
I have stated many times now that I saw many occult symbols in the video, and have agreed with the OP with most of his observations.
Sometimes I get a bit sarcastic, but I think (or thought) it was obvious when I was. But I do take the thread seriously or I wouldn't be participating, and I am not a dis-info agent. I happen to be gay, so I think it's understandable that his remarks were offensive to me.
REBEL V
Originally posted by nunya13
Originally posted by Furbs
This will be harder to do that you realize, because most of what is being done here is a logical fallacy known as Begging the Question.
Example. The illuminati exist because their symbols are in music videos! How do you know they are Illuminati symbols? Because they are Illuminati symbols!
.
Your example is incorrect. Begging the question is an argument that uses its own premise as proof of the validity of the original claim. Your example does not do that and no one has said we know these to be illuminati symbols just because. We believe these to be illuminati symbols because they are into the occult and esoteriscism. Oneone only has to do a quick search to find out what those symbols are, and there are many posts which explain there precense in the video.
Originally posted by rebelv
Originally posted by Furbs
Originally posted by Diplomat
It's definitely a pentagram though, do I need to post the definition of pentagram? I don't think it really matters if there's a hole in the center of it or not, but let's not argue over her earrings.... the most obvious symbolism in this video is when she keeps forming a triangle with her hands over her one eye.edit on 6/13/2012 by Diplomat because: (no reason given)
Yes, you do. If you are going to claim definitively that it is a pentagram, post the definition.
Actually.. let's look at it together.
en.wikipedia.org...
Oh this is ridiculous, and non-productive-- its a DAMN PENTAGRAM
REBEL V
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by Furbs
Yes, you're right. I did exactly say the number 108 on the building. You responded to me after I posted some esoteric beliefs about the number 108. I also posted some interesting facts about how the number 108 relates to the earth, moon and sun
You said:
That is not the history of the #108 seen on the building.
The history of that #108 is much more mundane.
I did not say the number had anything to do with the building itself, which was my point.
Originally posted by rebelv
Well, In a sense you are technically correct, but what's your point. Pretty much any 5 pointed star inside of a circle is considered by most to be a pentagram. Making a differentiation between a pentacle and a pentagram or by pointing out that the specific definition of a pentagram is that it has five lines.
I would say that if it's a five pointed star inside of a circle its a pentagram; most people would consider it a pentagram. The missing lines are all implied.
It's like pointing out that the word terrific actually means terrifying in response to someone using the word to express something fantastic and wonderful.
Technically you are correct, but I don't see the point of doing it, or how it is productive.
Sorry if I was rude. Its just that I don't see the point.
REBEL V
Originally posted by rebelv
Originally posted by Trafalgar1805
Has no-one noticed that the Olympic logo is a map of the world? You have North and South America depicted, and aswell as Eurasia and Africa. And what's the island in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean? It looks like a large Ascension Island.
Anyway, I am very suspicious about the London Olympics and its agenda. I think it was decided that the thirtieth Olympics would be in London in 2012, way back in the 19th century when the modern Olympics started.
The agenda is driven by homosexuals, and associated religious types, and involves the destruction of heterosexuality through an already genetically engineered sexual hybrid that has triple-X DNA. I haven't fully worked it all out, but it seems homosexuals will only permit Ascension on their anti-heterosexual terms. It seems that they have held a veto on Ascension for some ten thousand years and more. I don't know how they got this veto, but it might be about to expire. So, no - Ascension will occur on heterosexual terms.
What the hell? I didn't understand a word of that, did anyone else?
REBEL V