It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SmoKeyHaZe
Last night's fight was a SHAM of a decision & reflects very poorly on judges in Boxing.
I was stunned when I heard the result (having stayed up till 6am to watch the whole fight), and is a small part of the reason as to why Boxing has been in decline for some time, and MMA is so popular now.
Almost everybody had Pacquiao winning by a landslide victory (I had him winnin by eight rounds].
Were the judges watching another fight???
Pacquiao landed more total punches and landed more power shots, compared to Bradley.
Bradley even admitted defeat to promoter B. Arum too, prior to the split decision announcement.
When you're the challenger facing the champion, the impoteus is on you to bring it and show why you deserve to become champion. Judging by Bradley's performance, he did not do enough to beat Pacquiao.
Hell, even Marquez did more than Bradley (but still ended up losing to Manny, as it looked like he didn't do enough to overthrow him in that fight).
How two judges had Bradley winning by two rounds perplexes me..What a joke.edit on 10-6-2012 by SmoKeyHaZe because: (no reason given)
Didn't know Manny ever agreed to the tests, last thing i remember him saying is that taking blood makes him feel weak.