It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by canuckster
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by PurpleChiten
I have personally raised three gifted children. I have a college education. I have been very involved.
What was your major and how many classes did you take pertaining to human growth and development?
With an education, you should be able to handle the information presented here based on reseach: plato.stanford.edu...
going to school doesnt teach you to raise children
raising children teaches you to raise children. your own way with your own values, and keeping other people ideas out of it.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Kids in middle school understand exactly where the "banana" is to be inserted. They even understand why it is important to wrap the banana.
Originally posted by shoeshiner
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by shoeshiner
She is not a 6-10 year old.
She is a 10 year old. Plenty old enough for complex critical thought.
She has been exposed to these conspiracies from the age of 6 to 10.
No, 10 year olds are not capable of complex critical thinking, many adults arn't even capable of it. I'm not saying they are dumb. You get smart children but there is a reason they are "children".
Leave the child to be a child, and by all means shape her to develop critical thinking, but don't throw a 10 year old in a deep-end many adults don't want to get in and where many others drown.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by shoeshiner
How many children do you have? How old are they?
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by shoeshiner
How many children do you have? How old are they?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by Annee
No and I never said that I did.
I have a problem with people teaching inappropriate things to kindergartners.
No - - you are backtracking.
I have a problem with government usurping the rights of parents to teach moral values as they see fit. I am distinguishing between moral values and age appropriate sexual education. You stated I have an issue that I do not have. I just do not agree with you,.
Now you are just making excuses.edit on 10-6-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Kids in middle school understand exactly where the "banana" is to be inserted. They even understand why it is important to wrap the banana.
10 years old is 5th grade, that's still elementary
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Help us please oh nanny state. We need the government to raise our children. Someone on the internet doesn't agree with our values, because THEY know better.
No wonder we are in the state we are in... tyranny is so hip.
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
Originally posted by Furbs
That may be her intention, but it doesn't seem to be the result. What she appears to be teaching the student is how to get suspended from school for being inappropriate. If you want to teach a child to think, teach them how to think. Give them those tools.
The OP is simply filling the child's head with a contrary set of information to what she is being taught in school without the tools needed to make a judgement on which set of information is correct. This can often result in what is know as cognitive dissonance when two people she trusts to have the correct information are giving her conflicting accounts of reality. It will hinder her ability to trust and learn, much of like what happened with the OP herself.
these statements appear a bit presumptuous, in my opinion.
using the measures of socially appropriate or socially acceptable to judge a belief's validity seem to directly contradict the idea of learning.
we do NOT attend school to learn what to think, but we attend in order to learn how to think.
learning should be self-directed, not enforced by status quo.
although children do tend to adopt an older model's opinions and beliefs without quantification, the young lady in question could possess substantial opinions based on long circular thought processes.
we only have information about the OP, not the young lady who was punished for stating her beliefs.
suspending a child from school....
taking away a child's ability to educate themselves simply because they dare to speak a minorty belief is much more detrimental to a child's cognitive development than the behavior of the OP.
although both situations certainly rob the child from developing a personalized belief, which can effect development of healthy self-esteem...
the condemning actions of the teacher and administrators are much more likely to reinforce dysfunctional reactions and perceptions toward both authority figures and social institutions.
this process is called transfer.
you are correct.
the OP seems to be giving the young lady contrary information to the status quo while not teaching the critical thinking skills that are necessary to question the status quo.
however... the teacher is demonstrating the EXACT same behavior while also using punishment to modify a "socially inappropriate" behavior.
this type of logic is highly flawed because the teacher is not only teaching the child by using absolutes, but the teacher has the ability to punish the child as a means to facilitate cooperative behaviors.
i read earlier that someone made the comment that the child was out of line.
the child's comment was seen as a sarcastic response to the teacher's perception of history.
this is equally ludicrous.
the child should be praised for having the courage to express a contrary opinion.
ultimately, it is the teacher who is responsible for teaching the young lady critical thinking skills.
it is NOT the responsibility of the sibling to do this.
both the amount and degree of criticism being aimed at the OP in this thread are un-necessary and without merit.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Kids in middle school understand exactly where the "banana" is to be inserted. They even understand why it is important to wrap the banana.
10 years old is 5th grade, that's still elementary
When my granddaughter was 9 - - she asked me: "Is gay when a boy likes a boy and when a girl likes a girl?"
I said "Yes". She said: "Oh!" - - - and ran outside to play. That's how much it mattered.
Originally posted by shoeshiner
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by shoeshiner
She is not a 6-10 year old.
She is a 10 year old. Plenty old enough for complex critical thought.
She has been exposed to these conspiracies from the age of 6 to 10.
No, 10 year olds are not capable of complex critical thinking, many adults arn't even capable of it. I'm not saying they are dumb. You get smart children but there is a reason they are "children".
Leave the child to be a child, and by all means shape her to develop critical thinking, but don't throw a 10 year old in a deep-end many adults don't want to get in and where many others drown.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Originally posted by shoeshiner
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by shoeshiner
She is not a 6-10 year old.
She is a 10 year old. Plenty old enough for complex critical thought.
She has been exposed to these conspiracies from the age of 6 to 10.
No, 10 year olds are not capable of complex critical thinking, many adults arn't even capable of it. I'm not saying they are dumb. You get smart children but there is a reason they are "children".
Leave the child to be a child, and by all means shape her to develop critical thinking, but don't throw a 10 year old in a deep-end many adults don't want to get in and where many others drown.
You don't know or understand the depth of critical thinking a 10 year old is capable of, I do... Yes there is NO substitute for experience in this regard. Get back to me when you have experienced a variety of 10 year olds.