It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by nenothtu
Do you know what the true cost of healthcare is in this country? 12,000 for a good policy plus fifty bucks on the house insurance, a hefty amount on your car insurance, and the copay on all of these.
What about the fact that all businesses pass on their expenses to consumers so everything we buy has a little health insurance tacked onto it's cost.
Insurance companies make profit, they aren't in it to provide a service.
Doctors also have liability insurance which brings up rates to customers.
You can't sue the government.
Our present healthcare system sucks,
We are way down the totum pole as far as quality coverage but our costs are higher than most other countries.
We have crap. Our total cost of healthcare must be twenty five percent to thirty five percent of our wages.
if everything is taken into consideration. I'm sure you don't understand that your present health plan is inferior to one in socialized medicine countries.
The better your health plan, the worse chance you have of getting adequate treatment because the longer they keep you strung out the more they profit.
I've had many tests that I didn't need because of my good health insurance. I'm sure others have good horror stories also.
Originally posted by texasgirl
reply to post by axslinger
Thanks for your post, it was very informative to me. What do you suggest we do? Should we completely avoid putting any money into a flexible spending account?
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by nenothtu
Do you know what the true cost of healthcare is in this country? 12,000 for a good policy plus fifty bucks on the house insurance, a hefty amount on your car insurance, and the copay on all of these. What about the fact that all businesses pass on their expenses to consumers so everything we buy has a little health insurance tacked onto it's cost. Insurance companies make profit, they aren't in it to provide a service. Doctors also have liability insurance which brings up rates to customers. You can't sue the government. Our present healthcare system sucks, We are way down the totum pole as far as quality coverage but our costs are higher than most other countries. We have crap. Our total cost of healthcare must be twenty five percent to thirty five percent of our wages. if everything is taken into consideration. I'm sure you don't understand that your present health plan is inferior to one in socialized medicine countries. The better your health plan, the worse chance you have of getting adequate treatment because the longer they keep you strung out the more they profit. I've had many tests that I didn't need because of my good health insurance. I'm sure others have good horror stories also.
Based on what I see at the hospital I work at, (this is just observation and anecdotal), I would estimate that 75% of the ER visits are visits that should have been taken to a Primary Care Provider or Urgent Care, NOT an ER. Why do they go to an ER? Because many or most Urgent Care facilities are privately owned and they are not obligated to take you without insurance or payment. Emergency departments are held to a different standard, as near as I can tell.
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)[1] is a U.S. Act of Congress passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). It requires hospitals to provide care to anyone needing emergency healthcare treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay. There are no reimbursement provisions. Participating hospitals may only transfer or discharge patients needing emergency treatment under their own informed consent, after stabilization, or when their condition requires transfer to a hospital better equipped to administer the treatment.[1]
EMTALA applies to "participating hospitals." The statute defines "participating hospitals" as those that accept payment from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Medicare program.[2] However, in practical terms, EMTALA applies to virtually all hospitals in the U.S., with the exception of the Shriners Hospitals for Children, Indian Health Service hospitals, and Veterans Affairs hospitals.[citation needed] The combined payments of Medicare and Medicaid, $602 billion in 2004,[3] or roughly 44% of all medical expenditures in the U.S., make not participating in EMTALA impractical for nearly all hospitals. EMTALA's provisions apply to all patients, and not just to Medicare patients.[4][5]
The cost of emergency care required by EMTALA is not directly covered by the federal government. Because of this, the law has been criticized by some as an unfunded mandate.[6] Similarly, it has attracted controversy for its impacts on hospitals, and in particular, for its possible contributions to an emergency medical system that is "overburdened, underfunded and highly fragmented."[7] Charity Care or care provided to the uninsured represent an industry average of 20% of total cost of care provided[citation needed]. The uncompensated or non-reimbursed amounts are written off as bad debt thus becoming a tax write off and the unpaid bills are also sold to third party collection agencies for an average of 20 cents per dollar[citation needed]. However, health insurance reimbursements for services provided have continually been reduced by the health insurance companies[citation needed]. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements for services have also been reduced[citation needed]. The increasing financial pressures on hospitals and the passage of EMTALA and the additional costs of regulations that health service providers are required to maintain have caused consolidations and closures of many emergency room facilities[citation needed]. However, the number of emergency room clinics, or emergency rooms not attached to a traditional hospital, have increased, as they are generally more efficient and cost less to operate than a traditional hospital-based emergency room[citation needed]. There is debate[by whom?] about the extent to which EMTALA has led to cost-shifting and higher rates for insured or paying hospital patients, thereby contributing to the high overall rate of medical inflation in the U.S.
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Originally posted by axslinger
Based on what I see at the hospital I work at, (this is just observation and anecdotal), I would estimate that 75% of the ER visits are visits that should have been taken to a Primary Care Provider or Urgent Care, NOT an ER. Why do they go to an ER? Because many or most Urgent Care facilities are privately owned and they are not obligated to take you without insurance or payment.
Originally posted by otheym
reply to post by axslinger
Most folks who don't have a PCP don't have any health insurance at all and visit the ERs when they get sick because there is no where else to go. Many of them are employed but their employers don't provide coverage at all and they don't qualify for medicade or can't figure out how to fill out all the paperwork. Most people who collect public assistance hate it and would like to get off but the system encourages them to stay on. Also birth control information is not taught to young women these days due to religious reasons so yes, they do get pregnant and have kids and go on welfare. Duh!!
Originally posted by links234
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009.
That's nice. Now maybe he should take Nancy Pelosi's advice and read the law. Then, in three years (I guess that's how long it took him to read it), write a new article with actual information and maybe some actual quotes rather than conjecture and assumptions.
Originally posted by grandmakdw
reply to post by nenothtu
WHAT CAN PEOPLE WHO OPPOSE OBAMACARE AND ALL IT REPRESENTS DO?:
Get out and vote! Drive people who believe as you do to the polls if they can't drive! Organize voting parties.
Make YouTube videos mocking what will happen as a result of Obamacare. Make them funny/poignant. Start and participate in challenging blogs stating your beliefs and encouraging like minded people to vote.
.
Take your iPhones to the polls, record and post on YouTube any and all instances of voter fraud you see before the video is confiscated.
WHATEVER YOU DO, DON'T DO NOTHING - DO SOMETHING!!!!!!
ARE YOU UPSET ABOUT THE RULING?
Whatever you do, don't try and convince your liberal friends to your point of view. It won't work. The best tactic is to act humble and defeated around those who aren't going to change their minds.
Let hard core liberals think they have won. Tell them you give up and are staying home from voting. Give them every impression that Obama is a shoe in and sure to be re-elected. The more we act like that around liberals the more likely they will stay home on election day. They will talk to their friends and laugh at your defeatist attitude, yes, let them. We must now strive to make them feel superior and that they will win. That will ensure at least some of them will stay home, not vote, fat and secure they will win, until it is too late and the polls close.
It is only the like minded and those who have an open mind that you need to energize to get out and vote. We MUST secretly and quietly energize so many people that we have an army of voters who are silent but deadly.