It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO activity reported over NORAD.

page: 3
20
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 12:16 PM
link   
reply to post by maxella1
 

Off topic but it was the Golden Knights skydiving team.
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
reply to post by maxella1
 


That's from 2010.



I know, but don't they kinda look the same?



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by maxella1
 

Off topic but it was the Golden Knights skydiving team.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


And in NYC too?



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 01:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by pillock

Originally posted by cavtrooper7
reply to post by maxella1
 


Those look like flares over Ft.Carson.facing east. from Cheyenne Mt.
I served there and know Springs quite well.

edit on 7-6-2012 by cavtrooper7 because: finished my point

If they are flares why don't they fall ? and why when one light vanishes does another one appear in another position ?
I am sorry guys but the swamp gas , weather balloon , flare excuse cannot apply here .


You're absolutely wrong. At that altitude flares do not drop fast. The objects you view in this video are absolutely 100% positively flares that slowly fall and burn out. As the last flare burns out the aircraft or more likely helicopter deploys another flare at the top. They fall again slowly and when the bottom flare fizzles out they deploy a new one at the top. Not very complicated here..

Edit: It very well could have been skydivers as well.
edit on 8-6-2012 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by libertytoall
 


As the last flare burns out the aircraft or more likely helicopter deploys another flare at the top.

Not necessarily.


The mortar team at FOB Lagman mid-launch – sending multiple 120mm illumination rounds up at timed intervals.

militarytimes.com...



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 02:06 PM
link   
The OP reminded me of these ones in India. Nott sure if it was ever proven hoax or debunked; I hadn't thought so.




posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 02:08 PM
link   
reply to post by libertytoall
 

What would be the purpose of maintaing 3 lit flares at that altitude, at that timie of night and in that location?...



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Toxicsurf
 


I think the term is "training".
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 03:35 PM
link   
I've seen MANY lume rounds shot from 155mm arty, and guess what, these don't look like that to me.

Lume rounds emit a ton of smoke as they are burning. This isn't always visible in the night, but in lower light/pre-dark, especially in conditions as good as this, you'd see more than just a pop of light. No trail of smoke anywhere in this video at all. Additionally, while lume rounds do descend on parachutes, the key word is descend. These things didn't descend. They popped in and out of locations, some high some low. This is not anything like I've seen in the use of 155mm arty illumination rounds. Similar in that there are lights in the sky, but that's about it.


Here's a good view of arty lume:


Notice the rate of descent with the smoke trail. These lights don't descend like that. Even from a rather far vantage point, we shouldn't be seeing what we are in the original video if they were arty lume, per my experience.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 03:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Augustine62
 

They do descend. This can be demonstrated by measuring the distance between the light and the hills.


The lights in the video are substainally farther away than those. Thus the smoke would not be visible. Thus their rate of descent would not be as pronounced. I have seen illumination flares in the distance and I think these are them.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 03:49 PM
link   
thanks for this i love the oblivious drivers passing by who dont take th Time to just look up at the world around them



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 04:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I ghetto measured for that exact concept using some paper, as I would doing a measuring of a road on a .mil map. I noticed no appreciable descent for the longest burning lights. Due to the camera shaking, it's best to pause it to do so.

I'll concede that the smoke might not be visible from that distance, but all the times we needed flares, they sure fell faster than these things (which seem to me to be at a standstill). Used to drink coffee and chain smoke on the pad while watching arty light up the city at night for patrols. Samarra proper was further away than this from Brassfield-Mora, and I saw smoke then. I saw descent. I see none of what I know to be common attributes of arty lume.

Either way, whatever it is, I'm nestled nicely between Carson, Peterson, and USAFA. If there's a bright light, don't count on replies.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 04:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Augustine62
 


I noticed no appreciable descent for the longest burning lights. Due to the camera shaking, it's best to pause it to do so.

I paused the video, made screen captures, and counted the number of pixels between the lights and the hills. They descend.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Excellent. Please post your findings if you can since you have your evidence. I admit I could have been off on the measuring.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by pierregustavetoutant
 

Try to arrange three points so they don't form a triangle.
Hint: there is one way to do it.


Ha! Fair enough. There was a lot of flare activity in 2010 then, and they managed to pull off a very similar triangle, ie similar formation in several places around the world. Not different angles or arrangement of the 3 points.
As far as I know, it is all bogus, though.

Just find it interesting is all.
I tend toward the skeptical myself, but allow a space for plausible weirdness.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by IMSAM
 

I was a scout what were you? Ever seen a slap flare? Morter and artillery flares rock back and forth when they 1st ignite If that was an anti missile flare it would be more numerous.That leaves 203 flares(40mm).The timing of ignition is about right. Distance makes it appear like they are hovering.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 08:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
reply to post by maxella1
 


I'm a believer of other intelligent beings out there in the vastness of the universe. To think we would be the only life form and intelligent life form at that, is naive in my opinion. However one has to wonder what the necessity of lights would be for a craft piloted by intelligent beings from another planet. Why would they telegraph their positions? What purpose would lights serve them here on Earth other than to give away their presence? In domestic aircraft they're used to inform other craft of their position. This really doesn't make sense for an alien craft that's capable of navigating the cosmos. Just asking.

we don't know for sure if the source of the light is from a light bulb or something all together different. Because ET's visiting us have to at least be a 1-3 level civilization so their technology is beyond our comprehension, after all we only use 10% of our brain. My guess is the cause of the light has something more to do with the energy used to power the crafts.

As for being over a military base, maybe it's not a foreign craft, maybe those orbs belong to the US Military. Seeing how they are over a military base twice and the second one at least for 9mins over a military base without the military flipping a gasket.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 08:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
Did it get boring, so they decided to stop filming???


It always amazes me that people do that....film "ufos" only for like 1 or 2 mins. If I saw one, I'd film it until my damn camera battery died, or I ran out of film/space.


i saw a ufo that was right in front of me, i had my iphone which was probably good enough to get a good enough shot of it, but i was too lazy lol. i just watched it lol



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 09:36 PM
link   
I don't believe that the universe is full of rocks and us. There must be other life forms out there. Just look at the variety of living organisms right here on earth, and we keep finding new types of organisms all the time. Life can adapt to any environment. There is unlimited potential for life in the universe.

I have never seen a UFO in person.
I have never seen this guy in person either ..

but he definitely exist.

Some one told me once that if aliens are visiting earth, to them it's probably like a trip to the zoo. Why would they care if we can see them since we can't really do anything to them. And why would they want to talk to us, or teach us something? It would be like us teaching a fish how to read.

(maybe I heard this in a movie, can't remember But it's not something I came up all by myself).



edit on 8-6-2012 by maxella1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Augustine62
 


I noticed no appreciable descent for the longest burning lights. Due to the camera shaking, it's best to pause it to do so.

I paused the video, made screen captures, and counted the number of pixels between the lights and the hills. They descend.


so these are descending orb-crafts?




top topics



 
20
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join