It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
reply to post by tinfoilman
Oh, sorry. I'm wrong and you're right. Let's leave it to the government to fix things and we can all sleep better at night.
We do sleep better at night. Minimum wage started at 25 cents in 1938. We're better off today than back then and our economy and investment has expanded by leaps and bounds since. All based on this very system of cheap credit.
Of course the same system may one day eventually leads to a massive crash where millions die, but the point isn't that I'm for the system. I'm actually against the system. I would much prefer a free market system where it is controlled by the market.
All I'm saying is that the system we have now isn't controlled by the market therefore the market can't fix it. We may need a new system when this one fails.edit on 8-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by biggmoneyme
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
reply to post by tinfoilman
Oh, sorry. I'm wrong and you're right. Let's leave it to the government to fix things and we can all sleep better at night.
We do sleep better at night. Minimum wage started at 25 cents in 1938. We're better off today than back then and our economy and investment has expanded by leaps and bounds since. All based on this very system of cheap credit.
Of course the same system may one day eventually leads to a massive crash where millions die, but the point isn't that I'm for the system. I'm actually against the system. I would much prefer a free market system where it is controlled by the market.
All I'm saying is that the system we have now isn't controlled by the market therefore the market can't fix it. We may need a new system when this one fails.edit on 8-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
uh yeh it might of been 25 cents in 1938 but a gallon of milk didn't cost 5 dollars then did it? i fail to see the point of raising it if it just evens out. then thats just more paper i gotta carry. it'd be cool to go into a store with a hand full of change and come out with all kind of groceries like our grandparents did lol
Originally posted by interupt42
reply to post by tinfoilman
I said nothing about lay offs? What I said was you make the business pay more then the business will pass the cost to the consumer hence no gain.
Guess what, that waiter is a consumer so when he goes out to buy something he will have to pay more for the product than he would have had to pay for it before his new raise. So he gained no buying power even though he is making more money.
Furthermore, you would be LUCKY to maintain the SAME buying power after the minimum pay increase. In reality a business will take advantage of the situation as the consumers realize that prices are going to go up. So if the business cost of operations went up by a $1 because of the new wage they would most likely raise their prices by $1.25. Raising prices is never easy to do nor accepted by the public so they will take advantage and throw in a little more.edit on 8-6-2012 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by interupt42
The only thing that the increase of the minimum wage does is hurt the middle class.
If Joe is making $9.00 an hour at McCrap and his supervisor Bob makes $11:50 hour what happens.
1. Joe makes $10 Bucks and hour. Yea he got a raise!!!
2. Bob didn't get a raise. Well that sucks but he is an elitist supervisor.
3. Steve the proprietor of the McCrap realizes that he has to raise his prices in order to keep the same profit margin or doing business prior to giving Joe his $1.00 raise.
So what happens Now to Joe:
1. Joe got his raise and is happy, so he feels like splurging and decides to go online and buy two songs versus only one song this week. After all he is making some extra money with his new raise.
2. Wait a second, when Joe goes to buy his .99 song he realizes that it know cost him $1.99. Therefore, he only buys one song as he always had before but for a little more money..
What happens to Bob:
3. Bob has the same salary as before , so he goes and decides to buy his normal 2 songs a week for 1.98.
4. Wait a second, Bob realizes that the songs cost now 1.99 each versus .99. Therefore Bob only buys one song now versus the two he would have normally purchased for more money.
What happens to Steve:
1. Well Steve the smart business man took advantage of the opportunity to increase his prices. Although paying an extra $1 an hour to Joe only cost him an extra .25 per sandwich he capitalized on the opportunity and raised the price of the sandwich by.35 cents.edit on 8-6-2012 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tinfoilman
The evidence does not fit your logic
The truth is, as prices rise, Bob will eventually get a raise too.
We've had minimum wage since 1938. It's been going up ever since. According to your logic this means that every person has much less buying power than then they did in 1938. But that's not true. People today have FAR MORE buying power.
Today we have multiple computers, homes, cars, flat panel TVs, iPhones, food, (we're all fat). People have far more crap today than they ever had back in 1938 when minimum wage was only 25 cents. Even unemployed people have friggin iPhones. We got more junk falling out of our back ends than you can imagine.
Originally posted by interupt42
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Todays wages didn't contribute to any of those items it was mostly done on credit. As a matter of fact the economy has stopped because peoples credit has diminished. Without credit they can't afford those items let alone live on their salaries.
Originally posted by mileysubet
Why cant the CEO's' CFO's and the other Big wigs take a hit to their enormous paychecks and still be able to raise the minimum wage so that the little guy has more buying power?
That would not require any re-work to our current economic model, it would simply mean the rich are not as rich as they where last year (most of these big wigs could do with a million less in their portfolios, it wouldn't kill them". I mean really most of these guys have more money than they know what to do with.
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Originally posted by interupt42
Originally posted by tinfoilman
Todays wages didn't contribute to any of those items it was mostly done on credit. As a matter of fact the economy has stopped because peoples credit has diminished. Without credit they can't afford those items let alone live on their salaries.
That's what I've been trying to tell you the whole time. It's about cheap credit. That's how the whole system was designed to work and it's what got us this far. The reason the economy took a crap is because inflation stopped. Home prices stopped going up. They started going down and becoming worth less. Deflation happened. People couldn't pay their loans. That means they couldn't get new loans and that's bad because our entire system is based on credit.
They moved a whole bunch of jobs over seas which caused wages and prices to DROP and it destroyed our middle class. Deflation. Like I said it's deflation that kills the economy. Prices going down kills the economy.
However, if wages go up and prices go up, the loans people have out now will become far easier to pay off because what they're paying back would be far less of a percentage of the final equation than what it was when they borrowed the money out. Once they have those loans paid off, they take out new loans and the buying starts again. Prices go up, wages go up. Inflation!
Inflation=growth and growth is what we want. We don't want to spiral to the bottom with prices always going down. That causes us not to be able to pay the loans. You have to grow out of the loan with inflation.edit on 8-6-2012 by tinfoilman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Praetorius
Originally posted by oghamxx
For starters the CEO's will up their pay another $7,000 an hour. Got to maintain 'parity'!
Yes, yes, the wicked CEOs.
Why does everyone want to actual like all employers are CEOs with megabucks instead of realizing that most employers - in the US at least - are in SMALL BUSINESS, with a good many already struggling to make ends meet?
Originally posted by tinfoilman
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
It's not a free market now. The gov prints and borrows money into infinity and sets the interest rates and bailouts banks that should have collapsed and uses our tax money to move our jobs overseas while they give them tax BREAKS for moving overseas. In a free market system we wouldn't even have income tax and didn't used to.
It's a gov controlled system created by the gov. A system we didn't used to have. So, sometimes the gov has to make an adjustment. If we had a free market, the free market would adjust. But we don't currently have an entirely free market system. So, the solutions can't always be entirely free market based.