I want to share this info because whilst the leading claim of the MSM is that Assad forces are killing innocent women and children, if you actually
look at what the journalists inside Syria are reporting, they're not providing evidence to show the main claim is true.
Here is a report from Sky News' Tim Marshall who is inside Syria-
One of my most informative moments of this 15-month conflict came during the winter in a conversation with some ordinary working-class Christians in a
central Syrian town.
They explained how they had become terrified of some of their fellow countrymen in a neighbouring district that had been taken over by one of the
Sunni militias now fighting government forces.
But the Christians and Allawis fear that if the uprising results in a Sunni Muslim Brotherhood takeover they will be persecuted. It is true that
the Sunni death squads are already operating.
This is the MSM telling us we have to question the 'rebel's- Sunni death squads operating killing Christians, surely if we ever intervene in this
conflict we can not support the FSA??
The Shia man, a shopkeeper, took a harder line. He said he cautioned his optimistic friends who think this will be over by the autumn, saying: "It
will take a year to clean them out properly." By them, he meant the Free Syrian Army.
FSA is the enemy here in the view of many Syrians, the Assad forces are arguably guarding the country.
Syria is a far from perfect place, but before the uprising, you had people of many religions living together. The population of Syria is 74% Sunni,
12% Alawi, 10% Christian, and 3% Druze. They lived together, and now they are dragged into a civil war.
Also think of what the Syrian government is saying. From Wiki, they claim that-
According to the Syrian government, 5,700–6,400 people, including 2,000–2,500 members of the security forces, more than 800 insurgents and more
than 3,000 civilians, have been killed in fighting with what they characterize as "armed terrorist groups".
If 2,500 security forces have been killed, this is not a case of security forces going around killing peaceful protestors, the country itself is under
attack. If over 2,000 of Assad's police/army have been killed, then we are not dealing with peaceful protestors but an incredibly dangerous armed
group of rebels who have been militarised.
I want you to think about the following scenario critically and try and make sense of it-
Let's say there were protests against the government in America. The government forces were then ordered by Obama to kill protestors. Basically I am
asking you to imagine the MSM view of events in Syria happening in the US.
If this was really happening, would the US government then come out and claim that 'armed terrorists' were going around the country killing people?
What I'm saying is, if the government hates it's people that much they will execute women and children at point blank range like the MSM claims, then
why on Earth would the same government deny it to its own people and claim it is the foreign rebels? Does it add up?
The FSA claims to be 40,000+ strong, they are holding many towns seige in Syria, the army is fighting the FSA, who are effectively an invading
Here's more MSM giving some of the truth about the FSA, remember this is mainstream-
The reality is that intervention in Syria by the US and its allies has already begun. The western powers have backed the fractious opposition Syrian
National Council since the early days of last year's uprising. So have the Gulf autocracies led by Saudi Arabia, who have stepped up the flow of
weapons and cash to favoured Syrian rebel groups in recent months, while Turkey has provided a cross-border base. That is co-ordinated with the US,
which supplies the same groups with "non-lethal assistance" and "communications equipment".
In other words, the US and its allies are sponsoring regime change through civil war. And while paying lip service to the Annan plan for
demilitarisation and negotiation, they are making sure it won't succeed.
That is exactly what is happening and the MSM is saying it. The West have promoted, through funding, recruiting and arming rebels to create civil
war. The Syrian regime is fighting these people who are promoting the killing. That quote is from the MSM, they are telling you what is happening
and the sickness of the Annan plan because they are funding the cival war to overthrow Assad!
This just gets even more mind blowing when the Guardian goes on to say-
The results can be seen on the ground. Overall, lethal violence is estimated by human rights groups to have dropped by 36% since the plan was supposed
to come into effect, but government casualties have increased sharply over the same period (953 reported killed since mid-March). Rebel fighters
claimed to have killed 80 government troops last weekend alone.
During the Annan attempt for a ceasfire, killings dropped but Syrian regime soliders being killed increased! What more evidence do you need that the
country is under attack?
Never have I seen the MSM be so truthful-
Last year's Nato intervention in Libya increased the death toll by a factor of 10 to 15 and left a country of lawless warlords, torture and ethnic
cleansing. Intervention in Syria, whether by fully arming the opposition or using air power to create "humanitarian corridors", would have a far more
Anybody who advoactes a military intervention is insane.
The tragedy of what is happening in Syria is that the FSA is fighting the Syrian regime in populated areas, innocent people will always be caught up
in the conflict- a conflict that the West is funding to topple the Assad regime. If NATO got involved, and starting dropping bombs, the death toll of
civilians would be 10 times worse.
So to conclude, if you search for the truth, even parts of the MSM offer the reality. It is when you realise the infiltration by the Israeli lobby
within the US administration and the influence they have over Western foreign policy, then you can begin to understand why the West supports this evil
against humanity as the death toll continues to rise in Syria.
So why Syria? Well, it's postion is of great importance-
The idea of Syria as a regional oil transit hub is nothing new, thanks to its situation between Europe and major producing areas in the Persian Gulf
and Caspian Sea. There is already one major transnational gas pipeline passing through Syria, the Arab Gas Pipeline (AGP) from Egypt to the Lebanese
port of Tripoli.
In 2009, recognizing that the heady days of Syrian oil production in the 1980s were long gone and that the sector’s future lay in transit, Assad
announced a ‘four seas strategy’ aimed at transforming the country into a regional hub for oil transportation between the Persian Gulf and the
Black, Caspian and Mediterranean seas. He began taking steps to realize the country’s transit-center potential and bring the four seas strategy
closer to reality.
If they can impose a puppet in Syria, it makes the transport of oil from the middle east to the West a lot easier!
edit on 7-6-2012 by
Wonderer2012 because: (no reason given)