It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Documents prove Obama was member of socialist New Party... (see for yourself)

page: 8
61
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:08 PM
link   
Left and Right.

Far Left and Far Right.

Socialists and Capitalists.

Equality and Freedom.

Can't we all understand, for the sake of all political arguments what the sides really are. Equality and Freedom.

Left/Socialists = Equality for all at the expense of Freedom for all.
Right/Capitalists = Freedom for all at the expense of Equality for all.

The further you go down either side (far) the more for Equality/Freedom you are at the expense of the opposite concept Freedom/Equality.

Both freedom and equality are GOOD things, both are needed in civilized society, and neither side is more right or wrong then the other, just different values placed on these two concepts and how much of one you are willing to sacrifice to build up the other. Therefore balnce is the key to both concepts, and the "fight" about who is right and who is wrong was created by design to cause division among brothers within Nations.

Do you value both Equality and Freedom? If the answer is yes, then you are capible of having a decent conversation about right and left concepts, if you only value one, then you are never going to understand the other side of the argument, and your contributions to the discussion will not be as effective.

God Bless,




posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by LeoStarchild
 


Actually, the SCOTUS is about 4 liberal - 4 conservative - 1 independent

They will kill ObamaCare this month.


Donald Verrilli was laughed out of court.


CNN called it a train wreck.


--------
Also, it's sort of a non-story but i was watching MSNBC in the morning yesterday.

They said the Supreme Court was moving up their ruling to Monday June 11, 2012

because Kathleen Sebelius was trying to pull a fast one and push through some

ObamaCare grants - BEFORE - the Supreme Court has a chance to kill it.


------
The story however, disappeared! I guess someone made a phone call.

-- Don't do it! It will make us look devious! --

There is no mention of it anywhere!


I know this .. But what im trying to say is that we all know the liberal types like to bend the arms of conservatives... in the name of compromise..

When the situation is flipped.. Libs never compromise... This is why Conservatives are just better people imo.



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by burntheships

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by burntheships
 


It would have been a lie to say he was a member...because he wasn't.


Obama was a member of the New Party.


Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:


Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party.He also joined the New Party.
www.nationalreview.com...


Obama recieved an endorsement from The New Party.

That doesn't make him a member.

Logic 101.


Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:28 PM
link   
Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda..

And here comes another thread by "concerned citizens" Please, stop this nonsense. It's getting annoying. Jst admit You hate the guy on sight, and don't pretend to be against him on purely political grounds.

You have NO inkling what "socialist " means, You still live with Your head buried firmly in the "there's a Commie under your bed" mindset of the 50's.

I an SICK of the pretentious post that only prove ONE thing to me: A large swath of people do not like his colour.....
Threads like these are insulting, and a waste of space on a site that once was about the curious and the odd, but has transformed into a cess-pit of pure right-wing hatred and pathetic "tough-guy" talk about gun-law and state interference.

Let me be the stereo-typer from the other side, and state that ATS has been taken over by the most unpleasant, vile and stupid part of redneck America.

I am done here, after several years of membership I can only see one thing: There's no curing stupid and hate....

Toodles.

*off to find out if there is a possibility to have my account removed*



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 



Baloney.

Firefighting, police , military... ALL of these things were in existence LONG before Marx ever scored his first vicarious kill.


Just because the word "socialism" wasn't defined yet doesn't mean that those do not fit into the definition.

Why are you so scared of the word "socialism"??? Are you less of an American if you admit that you use the socialist highway system or the socialist education system???



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by TinfoilTP
 



You are saying any form of taxation is socialism?


Any program that is paid with public money is a form of socialism.


Are you saying it is capitalism???



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 



It's funded with MY money, not just "other people's" It is compensation for goods and services rendered... otherwise known as "capitalism".

"Entitlement" these days generally denote a feeling of deserving something for nothing - no services rendered. That is "other than" capitalism...


It's funded with my money as well...although I wish it wasn't. But I don't have a say in if my money is used to fund it...because it is funded with PUBLIC money...because it is a socialist program.

And what makes you think there isn't compensation for services rendered under socialism
The lack of knowledge and the embracement of mis-information in this thread is hilarious.

Entitlement is only a bad word because right wingers are paranoid and they have to create an "enemy"...their latest enemy is poor people.
edit on 7-6-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by coop039
 



Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?


No, recieving an endorsement does not mean you joined the organization.

Like the founder said in the article I linked previously...they didn't really have "members"...that was the whole idea behind the concept.



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by coop039
 



Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?


No, recieving an endorsement does not mean you joined the organization.

Like the founder said in the article I linked previously...they didn't really have "members"...that was the whole idea behind the concept.


But it says BOTH. Its says he sought endorsment AND that he joined.
In fact it says three things: 1: He signed the contract 2: he sought endorsement 3: He joined the party.
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by coop039


Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)


Really that's all that needs to be said.

All this deflection @ socialis et al, is just that. Deflection.

Obama fans are having an "oh crap" moment.
edit on 7-6-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   
reply to post by coop039
 


It says he signed a "Candidate Contract"...not a "Membership Contract" like some are trying to pass off.

You believe what you want...you go ahead and fall for the "evil socialist" propaganda...I honestly don't care.


But I do love that this is what Obama haters are having to reduce their attacks to...it speaks volumes as to how desperate they are.


BTW...did you know this was all already discussed in 2008??? It failed then...it will fail now.



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   

He also joined the New Party.


From the OP's source.

Right there.

*bazinga*



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by coop039


Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)


Really that's all that needs to be said.

All this deflection @ socialis et al, is just that. Deflection.

Obama fans are having an "oh crap" moment.
edit on 7-6-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)



If I was having an "oh crap" moment...I would probably just ignore the entire thread and hope it falls off the recent thread page.

But I keep bumping it with replies...I wonder why???



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by coop039
 


It says he signed a "Candidate Contract"...not a "Membership Contract" like some are trying to pass off.

You believe what you want...you go ahead and fall for the "evil socialist" propaganda...I honestly don't care.


But I do love that this is what Obama haters are having to reduce their attacks to...it speaks volumes as to how desperate they are.


BTW...did you know this was all already discussed in 2008??? It failed then...it will fail now.


You are able to read where it says "He also joined the New party", or is something on your screen?
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer

He also joined the New Party.


From the OP's source.

Right there.

*bazinga*


From the founder of "The New Party"

www.politico.com...



As for Obama's membership?

"We didn’t really have members," said Rogers. They also didn't have a ballot line in Chicago. So he said the line in the party newsletter appeared to refer to the fact that the party had endorsed him.



You go ahead and believe your right wing website that pushes out propaganda every day....I'll believe the FOUNDER of the party.


Isn't it odd that the founder of the party wouldn't want to claim that the current POTUS was a member of his party??? Oh, let me guess...they threatened to kill him.






posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 



If I was having an "oh crap" moment...I would probably just ignore the entire thread and hope it falls off the recent thread page.

But I keep bumping it with replies...I wonder why???


Well, hell, that statement right there says a whole hell of a lot!!!! Don't ya think?



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by coop039


Doesnt that last sentance say he joined the party?
edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-6-2012 by coop039 because: (no reason given)


Really that's all that needs to be said.

All this deflection @ socialis et al, is just that. Deflection.

Obama fans are having an "oh crap" moment.
edit on 7-6-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)



If I was having an "oh crap" moment...I would probably just ignore the entire thread and hope it falls off the recent thread page.

But I keep bumping it with replies...I wonder why???


Because not replying would give tacit acceptance to the claim.

That's okay OS. Just stand up and introduce yourself to the Obama-holics Anonymous.

Say, "Hi. My name is OutKast Searcher, and I'm an Obama-holic."




posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by diakrite
Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda..

And here comes another thread by "concerned citizens" Please, stop this nonsense. It's getting annoying. Jst admit You hate the guy on sight, and don't pretend to be against him on purely political grounds.

You have NO inkling what "socialist " means, You still live with Your head buried firmly in the "there's a Commie under your bed" mindset of the 50's.

I an SICK of the pretentious post that only prove ONE thing to me: A large swath of people do not like his colour.....
Threads like these are insulting, and a waste of space on a site that once was about the curious and the odd, but has transformed into a cess-pit of pure right-wing hatred and pathetic "tough-guy" talk about gun-law and state interference.

Let me be the stereo-typer from the other side, and state that ATS has been taken over by the most unpleasant, vile and stupid part of redneck America.

I am done here, after several years of membership I can only see one thing: There's no curing stupid and hate....

Toodles.

*off to find out if there is a possibility to have my account removed*


Good lord please do figure out how to remove your account because if you got "Racism" out of this then you are obviously ##SNIPPED## No where on here has racism been brought up until now and you my friend are perpetuating it. It seems to be the favorite defense when there is no other defense to be had and it totally weakens any argument that anyone else has for him.

I love though how because I am a republican I must be a Redneck. I feel sorry for you becuase you obviously cannot see past the blinders your wearing. Just because someone doesnt like this administrations policies or the lies being told does not make them a racist nor does it make them a redneck. Hell I am wearing Khakis and I drive a BMW right now. Redneck? Seriously? I play golf too.. lol..



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


If I knew that something was true and damaging to Obama...I wouldn't really be up for keeping it visible.

But when such garbage like the OP is recycled from 2008...I'm more than happy to keep the discussion going to see how far Obama haters will go to attempt to twist and distort the truth.

It's also a good example of how Obama haters contradict themselves and displays their gulibility for propaganda...evident by those in this thread who are afraid of words.



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by beezzer
 


If I knew that something was true and damaging to Obama...I wouldn't really be up for keeping it visible.

But when such garbage like the OP is recycled from 2008...I'm more than happy to keep the discussion going to see how far Obama haters will go to attempt to twist and distort the truth.

It's also a good example of how Obama haters contradict themselves and displays their gulibility for propaganda...evident by those in this thread who are afraid of words.


I want to remember this post after Romney is elected an you and the others are foaming at the mouth!





top topics



 
61
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join