Originally posted by Raivan31
As the Lion King Stated "it's the circle of life"
No, it's not ...
When women go back in history, to talk about how they were abused ... they never discuss "Cleopatra", or "Elizabeth I". It's because basically,
their claim is bogus ... sure, there are extreme societies where men have abused women, and there are individual cases as well. But there are also
the opposite cases, of women abusing men. And, in many cases where men have abused women physically, these very same have been the example of womens
mental abuse for decades. The a-typical "American psycho" comes to mind, an example of a male mentally abused by his mother throughout his
childhood, comes to mind.
Women have always, thoughout history been in the chair, behind almost everything ... and even if they weren't allowed to participate in politics,
that is because these politics were "war" politics. These war politics, historically, being a "mans" game ... where women, successively demanded
their part in the game.
One typical example, is that historically there used to be men's clubs. Exclusively for men ... all these clubs, have been "officially" abandoned,
although there are rumors about some clubs, that no one issure exists, such as the scull bearers, etc. But our current society, is full of
"exclusively women" club.
When concerning child birth, women say "it's our body" and deny you any right in wether your child is born or not. Not only do they deny you this,
they also uphold the exclusive right to throw away your baby ... even after birth, in the so called "baby bags".
You, a man, may consider yourself to be the "physically" stronger sex ... but you are definately, the "mentally" weaker sex. Whenever a woman
makes an arguement with you, she uses your own "empathatic" emotions against you. She uses it to make you feel bad, and to abandon your arguement
... but no matter what sort of appeal you make to a woman's empathy concerning your own situation, she will always refer to "herself", and her
A woman categorically lacks empathy for others.
And even though that means, that men may have some empathy for others, their empathy is "categorial", just as much as women's lack of it is.
Meaning, that it is not a "universal" thing.
The entire subject is in reality absurd ... there will never be "equality" between the sexes. Because there is such a thing as sex. Women are the
ideal of beauty ... their body a thing on a pedestal, where both men and women adore them. Women are made salespeople, because they have "sex
appeal". Women are mad office workers, because this sex appeal makes it harder for others to complain. An example, I go to the bank to exchange a
check ... the woman clerk there, is the dumbest person on the planet. She wants to take $50 as charge, for a check, that's already been charged.
But, she just looks at you ... arguements have no meaning. And if you file a complaint, you'll end up complaining to her boss, who is also a woman
and she no more idea of the check already being charged, than you do. You end up, paying double fee for your check .. and if you dare to raise your
voice, against these women and complain about their stupidity at not even reading the check "pre-charged", you'll find yourself being handled by
some muscle-monkeys who throw you out. This is a real life, example.
And if you care to go into history, and read individual cases, you will discover that even in history. From the time of the caveman ... the woman has
always been the ruler of the house. Inside the house, she always ruled ... and the man has only been a face, to the outside. What has happened is,
that women have just removed the remaining status a man has ever had ... and taken the leadership, both inside the house and outside. And her battle,
is to "not" to need a man at all.
Eventually, the woman will do away with men ... entirely.