Another massacre in Syria.

reply to post by beezzer


I am giving an example that you cannot accuse someone without proof. It is exactly what you are doing. Accusing Assad of slaughter without proof. How is what I am doing any different?

Please provide evidence to clear yourself of the charges I put forth on you.

No desperation here, just good debate.

Seriously, you guys are retarded for going back and forth with this guy for 5 pages. Like, how more obvious can it be that he's going to side with anyone who is against the west, even when the arguments themselves defy all logic.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Youve seen rebel footage of slaughter because they did the killings themselves.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONALI saw the rebel footage. Psychopaths often perform killings and blame others for it.

.............

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Why don't you provide visual evidence that you are not a murder.
The burden of proof is always on the accuser.

..........................................


Such an awful waste of time.

reply to post by IsraeliGuy


No I side with the people who stand up to the truth and defend it.

Plus it is me and human vs like 10 people lol, I am like a one man army here..

even when the arguments themselves defy all logic.

Nothing I have stated has defied logic

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
No I side with the people who stand up to the truth and defend it.

That's right bud, nothing like a religious state sponsored news media to put an emphasis on truth.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by beezzer

 

I am giving an example that you cannot accuse someone without proof. It is exactly what you are doing. Accusing Assad of slaughter without proof. How is what I am doing any different?

Please provide evidence to clear yourself of the charges I put forth on you.

No desperation here, just good debate.

edit on 113030p://6America/ChicagoWed, 06 Jun 2012 23:08:22 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)

No.

Good debate is point - counterpoint.

Not "here is footage of slaughter".

And the reply, "You slaughtered them."

It's akin to "nuh-uh" or the famous line used in the Lincoln/Douglas debates, "I'm rubber and you're glue."

reply to post by IsraeliGuy


And state sponsored somehow makes it wrong?
Religious backed makes it wrong?

CNN is a for PROFIT organization, they are doing it for the money, not the truth

Also as if western media does not have state or government interests.

Originally posted by beezzer

So your rebuttal is to flail about and accuse me of slaughter?

THAT is your defense of Assad?

I laughed so hard I coughed up my scotch through my nose all over the keyboard...

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Nothing I have stated has defied logic

Sure you have. You went on and on about how the burden of proof lies with the accuser while accusing the Rebels of doing the killings themselves, yet supplied no proofs what-so-ever except your theory of them being psychopaths and how in your opinions psychopaths kill and then record the massacre. Convenient.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
And state sponsored somehow makes it wrong?
Religious backed makes it wrong?

CNN is a for PROFIT organization, they are doing it for the money, not the truth

Also as if western media does not have state or government interests.

Yes, a newspaper hellbent on demonizing the west, which comes from a theocracy named Iran, isn't exactly something anyone would use to find the truth. PressTV is the extreme version of Fox.

Originally posted by IsraeliGuy

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
No I side with the people who stand up to the truth and defend it.

That's right bud, nothing like a religious state sponsored news media to put an emphasis on truth.

Nothing like a religious state sponsored genocide of Palestinians to make you look credible.

reply to post by beezzer

Not "here is footage of slaughter". And the reply, "You slaughtered them."

We saw the same tricks being played out in Libya which enabled NATO intervention.

The footage is also suspect because Syrian Danny was caught lying for CNN and this is all part of the same debacle and it is very likely that the footage video is manufactured by the rebel terrorists themselves to support NATO intervention.

reply to post by SLAYER69


SLAYER if you did not get, I was merely making him the subject of his own accusations which he tried to sidestep but failed hehe

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by beezzer

 

Not "here is footage of slaughter". And the reply, "You slaughtered them."

We saw the same tricks being played out in Libya which enabled NATO intervention.

The footage is also suspect because Syrian Danny was caught lying for CNN and this is all part of the same debacle and it is very likely that the footage video is manufactured by the rebel terrorists themselves to support NATO intervention.

So YOU can accuse without burden of proof, but we can't?



*beezzer gets a bowl of popcorn to watch the panic*

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by neo96

 

Proof please?

According to the "cia factbook"

Under people

there are 22 million people in Syria

www.cia.gov...

However demographics:

0-14 years: 35.2% (male 4,066,109/female 3,865,817)
15-64 years: 61% (male 6,985,067/female 6,753,619)
65 years and over: 3.8% (male 390,802/female 456,336) (2011 est.)


Now how does one get 90% of the vote?

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

SLAYER if you did not get, I was merely making him the subject of his own accusations which he tried to sidestep but failed hehe

You accuse the rebels of slaughter.
No proof.

You accuse me of murder.
No proof.

You defend Assad of slaughter.
No proof.

LL

reply to post by beezzer


Who am I accusing? Syrian Danny was caught lying with his pants off. The rebels just so happened to make a convenient video and then give it to the media.

The same Media who want war
The same media who sold us the wmd bit
The same media who are lying to us

Originally posted by HumanCondition

Originally posted by IsraeliGuy

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
No I side with the people who stand up to the truth and defend it.

That's right bud, nothing like a religious state sponsored news media to put an emphasis on truth.

Nothing like a religious state sponsored genocide of Palestinians to make you look credible.

Nothing like a random idiot that pops up in the middle if discussion only to interrupt with his BS about how Israel is bad.
Your post just screams "I'm a level headed reasonable guy".

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by beezzer

 

Who am I accusing? Syrian Danny was caught lying with his pants off. The rebels just so happened to make a convenient video and then give it to the media.

The same Media who want war
The same media who sold us the wmd bit
The same media who are lying to us

So you're saying no-one has died.

Proof?

reply to post by beezzer

You accuse the rebels of slaughter. No proof.

Incorrect I gave this post on the first page:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

You accuse me of murder. No proof.

I was doing it as an example to highlight your idiocy of accusing Assad without evidence as I clearly explained here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

You defend Assad of slaughter. No proof.

I defend him because my position is that there is no evidence against him as the burden is on the accuser

And even if there was evidence, we have no business.

reply to post by IsraeliGuy



Reason left this thread about two hours ago to go get coffee and hasn't returned.

Originally posted by beezzer


So YOU can accuse without burden of proof, but we can't?

This is exactly how State Sponsored media,such as PressTV operates.

I would love to see the opposition of Irans government,being put on Iranian sponsored TV. Unfortunately I have to rely on other media to hear their side. The same side,some on this site,claim 100% to being false,and inaccurate,unless it benefits their agenda.. You cant win with logic,like that,can you?