It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The originals are much higher quality. In this case it looks like there was a piece of debris of some sort on the film plate when it was scanned (these plates are huge and this is just a small part of one plate).
Originally posted by lamentiraestaahifuera
reply to post by DarknStormy
I was refering to this part of ngchunter's post:
The originals are much higher quality. In this case it looks like there was a piece of debris of some sort on the film plate when it was scanned (these plates are huge and this is just a small part of one plate).
I would like to check it.
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
Wow, the author of that article didn't even bother to ask an actual astronomer what the thing could be before writing the article, nor did the editors make that suggestion to him. They just instantly accepted one side of the story from one random guy who posts something on the internet. That's some truly terrible journalism for you.
What a terrible news source.
Originally posted by NoLoveInFear46and2
Omg is this nibiru finally? Prepare yourselves for the blow!!
It's gonna be hitting probably soon, surely this year???
I went to google sky to the coordinates in the article and I DID see the object they are talking about. I think someone at google or elsewhere is playing a joke. The images in google sky are very long exposure. The lens of the camera is open for many minutes or hours to get those detailed images of faint objects like galaxies. But an asteroid in the solar system would be moving and such a long exposure of an asteroid would show movement. The picture of the asteroid is too in focus for a long exposure of something moving. Someone is playing a hoax.
If it’s close, it should have color issues and be bright. If it’s far, it’s too massive to have been missed. Outside of our solar system and it wouldn’t have any apparent motion and should be visible in other images. And it’s not.
In fact, searching the various databases from which Google Sky draws its data (SDSS, DSS, HST, IRAS, and WMAP), the killer asteroid doesn’t appear at all. Thus, it would seem that this object is nothing more than a technical glitch introduced by Google’s stitching together of images.
Originally posted by Suspiria
It's no surprise with the Daily Mail lately, they don't even seem to proof read anything let alone do decent research. It's getting shocking.
Originally posted by Oannes
If it is real, then its a strange one. Looks fake, but the glow suggests interior heating? Nuclear maybe? Could be totally new to science. Keep an eye on that one.
Originally posted by ngchunter
reply to post by rolfharriss
Go to the primary source for DSS sky survey data. Google sky is not the primary source. It's still there and it's still just a single plate defect.