It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by neo96
We have changed and adapted to suit our ever changing environment IMO.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
It would have to be a virus as we already have a means to kill any and all bacteria with 0% chance that immunity will be developed. It will wipe out 100% of all non animal cells, bacterial, fungal, only virus are immune to it.
reply to post by neo96
That is what i was thinking as well human evolution has built in mechanisms to "weed out" the lesser gene pool, and when that occurs the species becomes stronger, and this has happened for thousands of years.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by 40luv
I've often posted the same sentiment but not nearly as accurate and colorful as you.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
I agree we need to stop coddling our children and allow them to be exposed to "dirty" things, as that is how we develop an immune system. I was only saying if a super bacteria-fungas-virus did appear we are prepared for it, at least on the bacterial/fungal level. I'm not sure how the antiviral treatment works.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
A drawback of using the super defensins is that it will purge your body of ALL bacteria, including ALL beneficial bacteria. It is broadspectrum, all bacteria, gram+ and gram-, nothing is immune to it. Only cell membranes with lipid (which is only animal cells) are left intact. You will have to restock your body with the good bacteria after, which will be an unpleasant time. Beats death though.
Originally posted by Dreine
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Does anyone remember a show on the History Channel that was discussing the Black Plague, and that the only reason Europe survived was that those people adapted to it? I found that episode extremely interesting, but I forget the name of it now... chalk that one up for on-the-fly evolution!
Originally posted by SLAYER69
A team led by Ajit Varki of the University of California, San Diego, found new genetic evidence which suggests that a mysterious plague ravaged populations of early humans in Africa, until their number fell to less than 10,000.
The obvious common sense should be that humans never had Siglec-13 to begin with because we didn't evolve from chimpanzees.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
I appreciate you taking the time to post your theory.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
As well as you have done to clarify your stance you do seem to give the wrong impression in that the overall theory is that we involved from Chimps.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The obvious common sense should be that humans never had Siglec-13 to begin with because we didn't evolve from chimpanzees.
I haven't read any modern scientific views [Biased or otherwise] state that we as a species "evolved from chimps" But rather Chimps and humans evolved from an ancient common ancestor. Couldn't the reasons why the two species react differently to your outlined clarifications be simply due to the fact that after the line split between Chimps and Humans that different changes/mutations occurred to both which is why what you have outlined has such a drastically different affect on each?
The reasons for the differences between the two species [Man and Chimp] you've outlined occurred after the genetic split from the common ancestor.
He never bothered to test any DNA from previous human species in the last 2 million years
Originally posted by fnpmitchreturns
One mans or one womans idea of evoultion is anothers natural selection....
I can see where bacteria might have altered our DNA but I am not sure.
In September 1665, George Viccars, a tailor in the small, central-England village of Eyam, received a parcel of cloth ridden with plague-infected fleas from London. Four days later, Viccars died. By the end of the month, five more villagers had succumbed to the plague. The panicked town turned to their rector, William Mompesson, who persuaded them to quarantine the entire village to prevent the bacterium from spreading throughout the region. It seemed like suicide. A year later, the first outsiders ventured into Eyam, expecting a ghost town. Yet, miraculously, half the town had survived. How did so many villagers live through the most devastating disease known to man? John Clifford examining the Eyam parish register John Clifford examining the Eyam parish register. Local Eyam lore tells befuddling stories of plague survivors who had close contact with the bacterium but never caught the disease. Elizabeth Hancock buried six children and her husband in a week, but never became ill. The village gravedigger handled hundreds of plague-ravaged corpses, but survived as well. Could these people have somehow been immune to the Black Death?
so if thats not adaptation what else could it be?
Black Death Aids In Africa Aids is proving a real scourge, in Europe less so. New research suggests that Europeans have inherited a resistance to Aids because of the devastating effects of the bubonic plague. Science In Action reports. Listen to Science In Action In the battle against Aids, scientists have acquired what looks like a potent new weapon. HIV, the virus that causes Aids, doesn’t infect everybody. Some people are simply born immune.