It appears to me that Mr. Horn has sneakily edited the wikipedia article on the "Prophecy of the Popes" in order to deceive the internet community
into thinking the Petrus Romanus prophecy is about a false pope!
Before his published work was released, the wikipedia article stated "Peter the Roman...WHO WILL FEED HIS SHEEP"
FEED! FEED! FEED!
Jesus states clearly in the Gospel of John to the Apostle PETER that "feeding the sheep" is exactly what Jesus INSISTED that Peter do in the name of
LOVING CHRIST. (see John 21:17)
Therefore Jesus would COMMAND every Pope between the Apostle Peter and the FINAL POPE and every religious leader for that matter, TO "FEED THE SHEEP
If they ignore Jesus' instructions to FEED THE SHEEP it is to their own peril.
Now, at this time, the very same wikipedia article titled "Prophecy of the Popes" contains the words "Peter the Roman...who will pasture his
Since the last archival someone decided to edit out the word "feed" and replace it with "pasture" instead.
The difference is very subtle, but the effect is huge and the intent is obvious: whoever edited the wikipedia article this year or last year had the
motivation to distance the Petrus Romanus prophecy from Christ's very own words and make it harder for people to figure out that the prophecy is about
a Pope that Loves Christ and not a false pope.
As far as I can tell, every instance in the INTERNET ARCHIVES, BEFORE this recent attempt at falsifying the Petrus Romanus prophecy, reveals that the
wikipedia article titled "Prophecy of the Popes" stated:
"Peter the Roman...will feed the sheep" !
The evidence is right here in abundance at the internet archives:
(edit: copy the next line:
and paste it in the search bar at the following archives sites:
and choose a year (click on available dates on the calendar there) to see the differences in the wikipedia article from as far back as 2005)
Today It has also just been brought to my attention that Jesus the SHEPHERD spoke further about the SHEEP AND THE PASTURE which the Bishop Malachy
prophecy alludes to:
JOHN 10:7-14 => "Therefore Jesus said again, “Very truly I tell you, I am the gate FOR THE SHEEP. All who have come before me are thieves and
robbers, but the sheep have not listened to them. I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved. They will come in and go out, and FIND
PASTURE. The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full. “I am the good
shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life FOR THE SHEEP. The hired hand is not the shepherd and does not own the sheep. So when he sees the wolf
coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. The man runs away because he is a hired hand and cares
nothing for the sheep. “I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me— just as the Father knows me and I know the Father —and I
lay down my life for the sheep. I HAVE OTHER SHEEP THAT ARE NOT OF THIS SHEEP PEN. I MUST BRING THEM ALSO. They too will listen to my voice, and there
shall be one flock and one shepherd."
As someone who has studied prophecy, with the desire for the truth (whatever it may be), I find attempts at corrupting a famous prophecy with an
interpretation that is absurdly the complete opposite of what is originally stated, to be shocking and quite offensive.
Neither is this an endorsement of the Malachy prophecy, the prophecy wasn't published until something like 300 years after the Bishop's death, so it's
authenticity cannot be automatically assumed.
edit on 6-6-2012 by Phantomfire707 because: (no reason given)